From 64e17bd793483b63092407cf79d434179436b250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: andyjessen <62343929+andyjessen@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 06:36:53 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] docs: Fix comment within "handle long text" example (#21248) The current doc-string comment is referring to the wrong schema. --- docs/docs/use_cases/extraction/how_to/handle_long_text.ipynb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/docs/use_cases/extraction/how_to/handle_long_text.ipynb b/docs/docs/use_cases/extraction/how_to/handle_long_text.ipynb index 6c1b6d01f37..7853095a8f7 100644 --- a/docs/docs/use_cases/extraction/how_to/handle_long_text.ipynb +++ b/docs/docs/use_cases/extraction/how_to/handle_long_text.ipynb @@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ "class KeyDevelopment(BaseModel):\n", " \"\"\"Information about a development in the history of cars.\"\"\"\n", "\n", - " # ^ Doc-string for the entity Person.\n", - " # This doc-string is sent to the LLM as the description of the schema Person,\n", + " # ^ Doc-string for the entity KeyDevelopment.\n", + " # This doc-string is sent to the LLM as the description of the schema KeyDevelopment,\n", " # and it can help to improve extraction results.\n", " # Note that all fields are required rather than optional!\n", " year: int = Field(\n",