diff --git a/.github/copilot-instructions.md b/.github/copilot-instructions.md
index bc3e4ab06bc..b12f23edb2e 100644
--- a/.github/copilot-instructions.md
+++ b/.github/copilot-instructions.md
@@ -1,72 +1,116 @@
-### 1. Avoid Breaking Changes (Stable Public Interfaces)
+# Global Development Guidelines for LangChain Projects
 
-* Carefully preserve **function signatures**, argument positions, and names for any exported/public methods.
-* Be cautious when **renaming**, **removing**, or **reordering** arguments — even small changes can break downstream consumers.
-* Use keyword-only arguments or clearly mark experimental features to isolate unstable APIs.
+## Core Development Principles
 
-Bad:
+### 1. Maintain Stable Public Interfaces ⚠️ CRITICAL
+
+**Always attempt to preserve function signatures, argument positions, and names for exported/public methods.**
+
+❌ **Bad - Breaking Change:**
 
 ```python
 def get_user(id, verbose=False):  # Changed from `user_id`
+    pass
 ```
 
-Good:
+✅ **Good - Stable Interface:**
 
 ```python
-def get_user(user_id: str, verbose: bool = False):  # Maintains stable interface
+def get_user(user_id: str, verbose: bool = False) -> User:
+    """Retrieve user by ID with optional verbose output."""
+    pass
 ```
 
-🧠 *Ask yourself:* “Would this change break someone's code if they used it last week?”
+**Before making ANY changes to public APIs:**
 
----
+- Check if the function/class is exported in `__init__.py`
+- Look for existing usage patterns in tests and examples
+- Use keyword-only arguments for new parameters: `*, new_param: str = "default"`
+- Mark experimental features clearly with docstring warnings (using reStructuredText, like `.. warning::`)
 
-### 2. Simplify Code and Use Clear Variable Names
+🧠 *Ask yourself:* "Would this change break someone's code if they used it last week?"
 
-* Prefer descriptive, **self-explanatory variable names**. Avoid overly short or cryptic identifiers.
-* Break up overly long or deeply nested functions for **readability and maintainability**.
-* Avoid unnecessary abstraction or premature optimization.
-* All generated Python code must include type hints and return types.
+### 2. Code Quality Standards
 
-Bad:
+**All Python code MUST include type hints and return types.**
+
+❌ **Bad:**
 
 ```python
 def p(u, d):
     return [x for x in u if x not in d]
 ```
 
-Good:
+✅ **Good:**
 
 ```python
-def filter_unknown_users(users: List[str], known_users: Set[str]) -> List[str]:
+def filter_unknown_users(users: list[str], known_users: set[str]) -> list[str]:
+    """Filter out users that are not in the known users set.
+
+    Args:
+        users: List of user identifiers to filter.
+        known_users: Set of known/valid user identifiers.
+
+    Returns:
+        List of users that are not in the known_users set.
+    """
     return [user for user in users if user not in known_users]
 ```
 
----
+**Style Requirements:**
 
-### 3. Ensure Unit Tests Cover New and Updated Functionality
+- Use descriptive, **self-explanatory variable names**. Avoid overly short or cryptic identifiers.
+- Attempt to break up complex functions (>20 lines) into smaller, focused functions where it makes sense
+- Avoid unnecessary abstraction or premature optimization
+- Follow existing patterns in the codebase you're modifying
 
-* Every new feature or bugfix should be **covered by a unit test**.
-* Test edge cases and failure conditions.
-* Use `pytest`, `unittest`, or the project’s existing framework consistently.
+### 3. Testing Requirements
 
-Checklist:
+**Every new feature or bugfix MUST be covered by unit tests.**
 
-* [ ] Does the test suite fail if your new logic is broken?
-* [ ] Are all expected behaviors exercised (happy path, invalid input, etc)?
-* [ ] Do tests use fixtures or mocks where needed?
+**Test Organization:**
 
----
+- Unit tests: `tests/unit_tests/` (no network calls allowed)
+- Integration tests: `tests/integration_tests/` (network calls permitted)
+- Use `pytest` as the testing framework
 
-### 4. Look for Suspicious or Risky Code
+**Test Quality Checklist:**
 
-* Watch out for:
+- [ ] Tests fail when your new logic is broken
+- [ ] Happy path is covered
+- [ ] Edge cases and error conditions are tested
+- [ ] Use fixtures/mocks for external dependencies
+- [ ] Tests are deterministic (no flaky tests)
 
-  * Use of `eval()`, `exec()`, or `pickle` on user-controlled input.
-  * Silent failure modes (`except: pass`).
-  * Unreachable code or commented-out blocks.
-  * Race conditions or resource leaks (file handles, sockets, threads).
+Checklist questions:
 
-Bad:
+- [ ] Does the test suite fail if your new logic is broken?
+- [ ] Are all expected behaviors exercised (happy path, invalid input, etc)?
+- [ ] Do tests use fixtures or mocks where needed?
+
+```python
+def test_filter_unknown_users():
+    """Test filtering unknown users from a list."""
+    users = ["alice", "bob", "charlie"]
+    known_users = {"alice", "bob"}
+
+    result = filter_unknown_users(users, known_users)
+
+    assert result == ["charlie"]
+    assert len(result) == 1
+```
+
+### 4. Security and Risk Assessment
+
+**Security Checklist:**
+
+- No `eval()`, `exec()`, or `pickle` on user-controlled input
+- Proper exception handling (no bare `except:`) and use a `msg` variable for error messages
+- Remove unreachable/commented code before committing
+- Race conditions or resource leaks (file handles, sockets, threads).
+- Ensure proper resource cleanup (file handles, connections)
+
+❌ **Bad:**
 
 ```python
 def load_config(path):
@@ -74,7 +118,7 @@ def load_config(path):
         return eval(f.read())  # ⚠️ Never eval config
 ```
 
-Good:
+✅ **Good:**
 
 ```python
 import json
@@ -84,68 +128,198 @@ def load_config(path: str) -> dict:
         return json.load(f)
 ```
 
----
+### 5. Documentation Standards
 
-### 5. Use Google-Style Docstrings (with Args section)
+**Use Google-style docstrings with Args section for all public functions.**
 
-* All public functions should include a **Google-style docstring**.
-* Include an `Args:` section where relevant.
-* Types should NOT be written in the docstring — use type hints instead.
-
-Bad:
+❌ **Insufficient Documentation:**
 
 ```python
 def send_email(to, msg):
     """Send an email to a recipient."""
 ```
 
-Good:
+✅ **Complete Documentation:**
 
 ```python
-def send_email(to: str, msg: str) -> None:
+def send_email(to: str, msg: str, *, priority: str = "normal") -> bool:
     """
-    Sends an email to a recipient.
+    Send an email to a recipient with specified priority.
 
     Args:
         to: The email address of the recipient.
-        msg: The message body.
+        msg: The message body to send.
+        priority: Email priority level (``'low'``, ``'normal'``, ``'high'``).
+
+    Returns:
+        True if email was sent successfully, False otherwise.
+
+    Raises:
+        InvalidEmailError: If the email address format is invalid.
+        SMTPConnectionError: If unable to connect to email server.
     """
 ```
 
+**Documentation Guidelines:**
+
+- Types go in function signatures, NOT in docstrings
+- Focus on "why" rather than "what" in descriptions
+- Document all parameters, return values, and exceptions
+- Keep descriptions concise but clear
+- Use reStructuredText for docstrings to enable rich formatting
+
 📌 *Tip:* Keep descriptions concise but clear. Only document return values if non-obvious.
 
+### 6. Architectural Improvements
+
+**When you encounter code that could be improved, suggest better designs:**
+
+❌ **Poor Design:**
+
+```python
+def process_data(data, db_conn, email_client, logger):
+    # Function doing too many things
+    validated = validate_data(data)
+    result = db_conn.save(validated)
+    email_client.send_notification(result)
+    logger.log(f"Processed {len(data)} items")
+    return result
+```
+
+✅ **Better Design:**
+
+```python
+@dataclass
+class ProcessingResult:
+    """Result of data processing operation."""
+    items_processed: int
+    success: bool
+    errors: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
+
+class DataProcessor:
+    """Handles data validation, storage, and notification."""
+
+    def __init__(self, db_conn: Database, email_client: EmailClient):
+        self.db = db_conn
+        self.email = email_client
+
+    def process(self, data: List[dict]) -> ProcessingResult:
+        """Process and store data with notifications."""
+        validated = self._validate_data(data)
+        result = self.db.save(validated)
+        self._notify_completion(result)
+        return result
+```
+
+**Design Improvement Areas:**
+
+If there's a **cleaner**, **more scalable**, or **simpler** design, highlight it and suggest improvements that would:
+
+- Reduce code duplication through shared utilities
+- Make unit testing easier
+- Improve separation of concerns (single responsibility)
+- Make unit testing easier through dependency injection
+- Add clarity without adding complexity
+- Prefer dataclasses for structured data
+
+## Development Tools & Commands
+
+### Package Management
+
+```bash
+# Add package
+uv add package-name
+
+# Sync project dependencies
+uv sync
+uv lock
+```
+
+### Testing
+
+```bash
+# Run unit tests (no network)
+make test
+
+# Don't run integration tests, as API keys must be set
+
+# Run specific test file
+uv run --group test pytest tests/unit_tests/test_specific.py
+```
+
+### Code Quality
+
+```bash
+# Lint code
+make lint
+
+# Format code
+make format
+
+# Type checking
+uv run --group lint mypy .
+```
+
+### Dependency Management Patterns
+
+**Local Development Dependencies:**
+
+```toml
+[tool.uv.sources]
+langchain-core = { path = "../core", editable = true }
+langchain-tests = { path = "../standard-tests", editable = true }
+```
+
+**For tools, use the `@tool` decorator from `langchain_core.tools`:**
+
+```python
+from langchain_core.tools import tool
+
+@tool
+def search_database(query: str) -> str:
+    """Search the database for relevant information.
+
+    Args:
+        query: The search query string.
+    """
+    # Implementation here
+    return results
+```
+
+## Commit Standards
+
+**Use Conventional Commits format for PR titles:**
+
+- `feat(core): add multi-tenant support`
+- `fix(cli): resolve flag parsing error`
+- `docs: update API usage examples`
+- `docs(openai): update API usage examples`
+
+## Framework-Specific Guidelines
+
+- Follow the existing patterns in `langchain-core` for base abstractions
+- Use `langchain_core.callbacks` for execution tracking
+- Implement proper streaming support where applicable
+- Avoid deprecated components like legacy `LLMChain`
+
+### Partner Integrations
+
+- Follow the established patterns in existing partner libraries
+- Implement standard interfaces (`BaseChatModel`, `BaseEmbeddings`, etc.)
+- Include comprehensive integration tests
+- Document API key requirements and authentication
+
 ---
 
-### 6. Propose Better Designs When Applicable
+## Quick Reference Checklist
 
-* If there's a **cleaner**, **more scalable**, or **simpler** design, highlight it.
-* Suggest improvements, even if they require some refactoring — especially if the new code would:
+Before submitting code changes:
 
-  * Reduce duplication
-  * Make unit testing easier
-  * Improve separation of concerns
-  * Add clarity without adding complexity
-
-Instead of:
-
-```python
-def save(data, db_conn):
-    # manually serializes fields
-```
-
-You might suggest:
-
-```python
-# Suggest using dataclasses or Pydantic for automatic serialization and validation
-```
-
-### 7. Misc
-
-* When suggesting package installation commands, use `uv pip install` as this project uses `uv`.
-* When creating tools for agents, use the @tool decorator from langchain_core.tools. The tool's docstring serves as its functional description for the agent.
-* Avoid suggesting deprecated components, such as the legacy LLMChain.
-* We use Conventional Commits format for pull request titles. Example PR titles:
-    * feat(core): add multi‐tenant support
-    * fix(cli): resolve flag parsing error
-    * docs: update API usage examples
-    * docs(openai): update API usage examples
+- [ ] **Breaking Changes**: Verified no public API changes
+- [ ] **Type Hints**: All functions have complete type annotations
+- [ ] **Tests**: New functionality is fully tested
+- [ ] **Security**: No dangerous patterns (eval, silent failures, etc.)
+- [ ] **Documentation**: Google-style docstrings for public functions
+- [ ] **Code Quality**: `make lint` and `make format` pass
+- [ ] **Architecture**: Suggested improvements where applicable
+- [ ] **Commit Message**: Follows Conventional Commits format