mirror of
https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain.git
synced 2025-07-30 00:04:19 +00:00
Apply patch
This commit is contained in:
open-swe[bot]
parent
2dda97f6da
commit
d1e266125e
@ -181,3 +181,204 @@ This issue requires investigation of:
|
||||
2. **Database query logic** for workspace statistics
|
||||
3. **API endpoint implementation** differences between stats and table views
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Issue Resolution Guidance
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Classification
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue Type**: LangSmith Platform Backend Bug
|
||||
**Severity**: Data Inconsistency - UI Display Mismatch
|
||||
**Location**: Server-side API endpoint implementation
|
||||
**Impact**: User confusion due to conflicting project counts
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Investigation Required
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. API Endpoint Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
#### Primary Endpoint Investigation
|
||||
**Target**: `{apiWorkspacesPath}/current/stats`
|
||||
- **Function**: `get_current_workspace_stats()`
|
||||
- **Returns**: `tracer_session_count` (currently showing 55)
|
||||
- **Issue**: Count doesn't match visible projects in table
|
||||
|
||||
#### Secondary Endpoint Investigation
|
||||
**Target**: Tracing table data endpoint (likely `/projects` or `/sessions`)
|
||||
- **Function**: Project listing/pagination logic
|
||||
- **Returns**: Visible project list (currently showing 5)
|
||||
- **Issue**: Different counting methodology than stats endpoint
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. API Response Comparison Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 1: Capture API Responses
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Stats endpoint response
|
||||
curl -X GET "{apiWorkspacesPath}/current/stats" \
|
||||
-H "Authorization: Bearer {token}" \
|
||||
-H "Content-Type: application/json"
|
||||
|
||||
# Expected response structure:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"tracer_session_count": 55,
|
||||
"other_stats": "...",
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Table/listing endpoint response
|
||||
curl -X GET "{apiWorkspacesPath}/projects" \
|
||||
-H "Authorization: Bearer {token}" \
|
||||
-H "Content-Type: application/json"
|
||||
|
||||
# Expected response structure:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"projects": [...], // Array of 5 visible projects
|
||||
"total_count": ?, // Compare with stats count
|
||||
"pagination": {...}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 2: Response Analysis Questions
|
||||
1. **Count Discrepancy**: Why does `tracer_session_count` (55) ≠ visible projects (5)?
|
||||
2. **Data Source**: Do both endpoints query the same database tables?
|
||||
3. **Filtering Logic**: Are different WHERE clauses applied?
|
||||
4. **Caching**: Is the stats endpoint using stale cached data?
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Potential Root Causes Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
#### Cause 1: Data Inconsistency
|
||||
**Hypothesis**: Stats endpoint counts ALL sessions, table shows only ACTIVE/VISIBLE ones
|
||||
|
||||
**Investigation Points**:
|
||||
- Check if stats includes deleted/archived projects
|
||||
- Verify if stats counts system/internal projects
|
||||
- Compare database queries for different session states
|
||||
|
||||
**Database Query Comparison**:
|
||||
```sql
|
||||
-- Stats endpoint query (suspected)
|
||||
SELECT COUNT(*) as tracer_session_count
|
||||
FROM tracer_sessions
|
||||
WHERE workspace_id = ?;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Table endpoint query (suspected)
|
||||
SELECT * FROM tracer_sessions
|
||||
WHERE workspace_id = ?
|
||||
AND status = 'active'
|
||||
AND deleted_at IS NULL
|
||||
AND visible = true
|
||||
LIMIT 20 OFFSET 0;
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Cause 2: Caching Problems
|
||||
**Hypothesis**: Stats endpoint uses cached data that's not invalidated properly
|
||||
|
||||
**Investigation Points**:
|
||||
- Check cache TTL settings for workspace stats
|
||||
- Verify cache invalidation triggers (project creation/deletion)
|
||||
- Compare fresh database query vs cached response
|
||||
- Look for cache warming/refresh mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
**Cache Investigation**:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Pseudo-code for cache analysis
|
||||
def get_current_workspace_stats():
|
||||
cache_key = f"workspace_stats_{workspace_id}"
|
||||
cached_stats = redis.get(cache_key)
|
||||
|
||||
if cached_stats:
|
||||
return cached_stats # Potentially stale data
|
||||
|
||||
# Fresh database query
|
||||
stats = database.query_workspace_stats(workspace_id)
|
||||
redis.setex(cache_key, TTL, stats)
|
||||
return stats
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Cause 3: Different Filtering Logic
|
||||
**Hypothesis**: Sidebar and table use different business logic for "project" definition
|
||||
|
||||
**Investigation Points**:
|
||||
- Compare project visibility rules between endpoints
|
||||
- Check user permission filtering differences
|
||||
- Verify workspace-level vs user-level project access
|
||||
- Analyze project type filtering (user vs system projects)
|
||||
|
||||
**Filtering Logic Comparison**:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Stats endpoint filtering (suspected)
|
||||
def count_tracer_sessions(workspace_id):
|
||||
return db.count(
|
||||
table='tracer_sessions',
|
||||
where={'workspace_id': workspace_id}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Table endpoint filtering (suspected)
|
||||
def list_tracer_sessions(workspace_id, user_id):
|
||||
return db.query(
|
||||
table='tracer_sessions',
|
||||
where={
|
||||
'workspace_id': workspace_id,
|
||||
'user_id': user_id, # User-specific filtering
|
||||
'status': 'active',
|
||||
'deleted_at': None
|
||||
},
|
||||
limit=20
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Cause 4: Pagination Logic Issues
|
||||
**Hypothesis**: Table pagination doesn't reflect true total count
|
||||
|
||||
**Investigation Points**:
|
||||
- Check if table shows "5 of 55" or just "5 total"
|
||||
- Verify pagination metadata in API responses
|
||||
- Compare `total_count` field vs `tracer_session_count`
|
||||
- Test pagination navigation (next/previous pages)
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Debugging Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 1: Data Verification
|
||||
1. **Direct Database Query**: Run raw SQL to get actual project counts
|
||||
2. **API Response Logging**: Enable detailed logging for both endpoints
|
||||
3. **Cache Analysis**: Check Redis/cache contents for workspace stats
|
||||
4. **User Context**: Verify if issue is user-specific or workspace-wide
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 2: Code Analysis
|
||||
1. **Function Comparison**: Compare `get_current_workspace_stats()` vs table query logic
|
||||
2. **Database Schema**: Review tracer_sessions table structure and indexes
|
||||
3. **Business Logic**: Analyze project visibility and filtering rules
|
||||
4. **Cache Implementation**: Review caching strategy and invalidation logic
|
||||
|
||||
#### Phase 3: Testing Strategy
|
||||
1. **Create Test Project**: Add new project and verify both endpoints update
|
||||
2. **Delete Test Project**: Remove project and check if both endpoints reflect change
|
||||
3. **User Permission Test**: Test with different user roles/permissions
|
||||
4. **Cache Invalidation Test**: Force cache refresh and compare results
|
||||
|
||||
## Expected Investigation Outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 1: Data Inconsistency Found
|
||||
- **Solution**: Align filtering logic between endpoints
|
||||
- **Fix**: Update stats query to match table visibility rules
|
||||
- **Validation**: Verify counts match after fix
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 2: Caching Issue Identified
|
||||
- **Solution**: Fix cache invalidation or reduce TTL
|
||||
- **Fix**: Update cache refresh triggers
|
||||
- **Validation**: Test real-time count updates
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 3: Business Logic Mismatch
|
||||
- **Solution**: Standardize project counting methodology
|
||||
- **Fix**: Update either stats or table logic for consistency
|
||||
- **Validation**: Document and test new counting rules
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario 4: UI/Frontend Issue
|
||||
- **Solution**: Fix frontend display logic
|
||||
- **Fix**: Update sidebar or table rendering
|
||||
- **Validation**: Verify UI shows consistent counts
|
||||
|
||||
This comprehensive investigation approach should identify the root cause of the 55 vs 5 project count discrepancy in the LangSmith platform.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user