Llama-3.1 started failing consistently with
> groq.BadRequestError: Error code: 400 - ***'error': ***'message':
"Failed to call a function. Please adjust your prompt. See
'failed_generation' for more details.", 'type': 'invalid_request_error',
'code': 'tool_use_failed', 'failed_generation':
'<function=brave_search>***"query": "Hello!"***</function>'***
Added support for new Exa API features. Updated Exa docs and python
package (langchain-exa).
Description
Added support for new Exa API features in the langchain-exa package:
- Added max_characters option for text content
- Added support for summary and custom summary prompts
- Added livecrawl option with "always", "fallback", "never" settings
- Added "auto" option for search type
- Updated documentation and tests
Dependencies
- No new dependencies required. Using existing features from exa-py.
twitter: @theishangoswami
---------
Co-authored-by: Chester Curme <chester.curme@gmail.com>
Scheduled testing started failing today because the Responses API
stopped raising `BadRequestError` for a schema that was previously
invalid when `strict=True`.
Although docs still say that [some type-specific keywords are not yet
supported](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/structured-outputs#some-type-specific-keywords-are-not-yet-supported)
(including `minimum` and `maximum` for numbers), the below appears to
run and correctly respect the constraints:
```python
import json
import openai
maximums = list(range(1, 11))
arg_values = []
for maximum in maximums:
tool = {
"type": "function",
"name": "magic_function",
"description": "Applies a magic function to an input.",
"parameters": {
"properties": {
"input": {"maximum": maximum, "minimum": 0, "type": "integer"}
},
"required": ["input"],
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": False
},
"strict": True
}
client = openai.OpenAI()
response = client.responses.create(
model="gpt-4.1",
input=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is the value of magic_function(3)? Use the tool."}],
tools=[tool],
)
function_call = next(item for item in response.output if item.type == "function_call")
args = json.loads(function_call.arguments)
arg_values.append(args["input"])
print(maximums)
print(arg_values)
# [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
# [1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3]
```
Until yesterday this raised BadRequestError.
The same is not true of Chat Completions, which appears to still raise
BadRequestError
```python
tool = {
"type": "function",
"function": {
"name": "magic_function",
"description": "Applies a magic function to an input.",
"parameters": {
"properties": {
"input": {"maximum": 5, "minimum": 0, "type": "integer"}
},
"required": ["input"],
"type": "object",
"additionalProperties": False
},
"strict": True
}
}
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4.1",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is the value of magic_function(3)? Use the tool."}],
tools=[tool],
)
response # raises BadRequestError
```
Here we update tests accordingly.
**PR message**: Not sure if I put the check at the right spot, but I
thought throwing the error before the loop made sense to me.
**Description:** Checks if there are only system messages using
AnthropicChat model and throws an error if it's the case. Check Issue
for more details
**Issue:** #30764
---------
Co-authored-by: Chester Curme <chester.curme@gmail.com>
**Description**:
Add a `async_client_kwargs` field to ollama chat/llm/embeddings adapters
that is passed to async httpx client constructor.
**Motivation:**
In my use-case:
- chat/embedding model adapters may be created frequently, sometimes to
be called just once or to never be called at all
- they may be used in bots sunc and async mode (not known at the moment
they are created)
So, I want to keep a static transport instance maintaining connection
pool, so model adapters can be created and destroyed freely. But that
doesn't work when both sync and async functions are in use as I can only
pass one transport instance for both sync and async client, while
transport types must be different for them. So I can't make both sync
and async calls use shared transport with current model adapter
interfaces.
In this PR I add a separate `async_client_kwargs` that gets passed to
async client constructor, so it will be possible to pass a separate
transport instance. For sake of backwards compatibility, it is merged
with `client_kwargs`, so nothing changes when it is not set.
I am unable to run linter right now, but the changes look ok.
Updates dependencies to Chroma to integrate the major release of Chroma
with improved performance, and to fix issues users have been seeing
using the latest chroma docker image with langchain-chroma
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/issues/31047#issuecomment-2850790841
Updates chromadb dependency to >=1.0.9
This also removes the dependency of chroma-hnswlib, meaning it can run
against python 3.13 runners for tests as well.
Tested this by pulling the latest Chroma docker image, running
langchain-chroma using client mode
```
httpClient = chromadb.HttpClient(host="localhost", port=8000)
vector_store = Chroma(
client=httpClient,
collection_name="test",
embedding_function=embeddings,
)
```
Some providers include (legacy) function calls in `additional_kwargs` in
addition to tool calls. We currently unpack both function calls and tool
calls if present, but OpenAI will raise 400 in this case.
This can come up if providers are mixed in a tool-calling loop. Example:
```python
from langchain.chat_models import init_chat_model
from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage
from langchain_core.tools import tool
@tool
def get_weather(location: str) -> str:
"""Get weather at a location."""
return "It's sunny."
gemini = init_chat_model("google_genai:gemini-2.0-flash-001").bind_tools([get_weather])
openai = init_chat_model("openai:gpt-4.1-mini").bind_tools([get_weather])
input_message = HumanMessage("What's the weather in Boston?")
tool_call_message = gemini.invoke([input_message])
assert len(tool_call_message.tool_calls) == 1
tool_call = tool_call_message.tool_calls[0]
tool_message = get_weather.invoke(tool_call)
response = openai.invoke( # currently raises 400 / BadRequestError
[input_message, tool_call_message, tool_message]
)
```
Here we ignore function calls if tool calls are present.
Anthropic updated how they report token counts during streaming today.
See changes to `MessageDeltaUsage` in [this
commit](2da00f26c5 (diff-1a396eba0cd9cd8952dcdb58049d3b13f6b7768ead1411888d66e28211f7bfc5)).
It's clean and simple to grab these fields from the final
`message_delta` event. However, some of them are typed as Optional, and
language
[here](e42451ab3f/src/anthropic/lib/streaming/_messages.py (L462))
suggests they may not always be present. So here we take the required
field from the `message_delta` event as we were doing previously, and
ignore the rest.
partners: (langchain-openai) total_tokens should not add 'Nonetype' t…
# PR Description
## Description
Fixed an issue in `langchain-openai` where `total_tokens` was
incorrectly adding `None` to an integer, causing a TypeError. The fix
ensures proper type checking before adding token counts.
## Issue
Fixes the TypeError traceback shown in the image where `'NoneType'`
cannot be added to an integer.
## Dependencies
None
## Twitter handle
None
Co-authored-by: qiulijie <qiulijie@yuaiweiwu.com>
**What does this PR do?**
This PR replaces deprecated usages of ```.dict()``` with
```.model_dump()``` to ensure compatibility with Pydantic v2 and prepare
for v3, addressing the deprecation warning
```PydanticDeprecatedSince20``` as required in [Issue#
31103](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/issues/31103).
**Changes made:**
* Replaced ```.dict()``` with ```.model_dump()``` in multiple locations
* Ensured consistency with Pydantic v2 migration guidelines
* Verified compatibility across affected modules
**Notes**
* This is a code maintenance and compatibility update
* Tested locally with Pydantic v2.11
* No functional logic changes; only internal method replacements to
prevent deprecation issues
