Issues with combining flex and nano
```shell
FAILED tests/integration_tests/chat_models/test_base.py::test_openai_invoke - openai.InternalServerError: Error code: 500 - {'error': {'message': 'The server had an error while processing your request. Sorry about that!', 'type': 'server_error', 'param': None, 'code': None}}
FAILED tests/integration_tests/chat_models/test_base.py::test_stream - openai.InternalServerError: Error code: 500 - {'error': {'message': 'The server had an error processing your request. Sorry about that! You can retry your request, or contact us through our help center at help.openai.com if you keep seeing this error. (Please include the request ID req_e726769d95994fd4bccbe55680a35f59 in your email.)', 'type': 'server_error', 'param': None, 'code': None}}
FAILED tests/integration_tests/chat_models/test_base.py::test_flex_usage_responses[False] - openai.InternalServerError: Error code: 500 - {'error': {'message': 'An error occurred while processing your request. You can retry your request, or contact us through our help center at help.openai.com if the error persists. Please include the request ID req_935316418319494d8682e4adcd67ab47 in your message.', 'type': 'server_error', 'param': None, 'code': 'server_error'}}
FAILED tests/integration_tests/chat_models/test_base.py::test_flex_usage_responses[True] - openai.APIError: An error occurred while processing your request. You can retry your request, or contact us through our help center at help.openai.com if the error persists. Please include the request ID req_f3c164d0d1f045a5a0f5965ab5c253bf in your message.
```
Use of the fixture `_base_vcr_config` is deprecated with alternative
function `base_vcr_config()`
This way:
* we don't need to import `_base_vcr_config` seen as unused (which leads
to ruff violations PLC0414 and F811)
* we don't need to make a copy since a new dict is created at each
function invocation
Co-authored-by: Mason Daugherty <mason@langchain.dev>
Fixed a bug where GPT-5 temperature validation was case-sensitive,
causing issues when users
specified Azure deployment names or model names in uppercase (e.g.,
`"GPT-5-2025-01-01"`, `"GPT-5-NANO"`). The validation now correctly
handles model names regardless of case.
Changes made:
- Updated `validate_temperature()` method in `BaseChatOpenAI` to perform
case-insensitive
model name comparisons
- Updated `_get_encoding_model()` method to use case-insensitive checks
for tiktoken encoder
selection
- Added comprehensive unit tests to verify case-insensitive behavior
with various case
combinations
**Issue:** Fixes#34003
**Dependencies:** None
**Test Coverage:**
- All existing tests pass
- New test `test_gpt_5_temperature_case_insensitive` covers uppercase,
lowercase, and
mixed-case model names
- Tests verify both non-chat GPT-5 models (temperature removed) and chat
models (temperature
preserved)
- Lint and format checks pass (`make lint`, `make format`)
---------
Co-authored-by: Mason Daugherty <github@mdrxy.com>
Now returns (`_iter`, `tokens`, `indices`, token_counts`). The
`token_counts` are calculated directly during tokenization, which is
more accurate and efficient than splitting strings later.
## Description
Fixes#31227 - Resolves the issue where `OpenAIEmbeddings` exceeds
OpenAI's 300,000 token per request limit, causing 400 BadRequest errors.
## Problem
When embedding large document sets, LangChain would send batches
containing more than 300,000 tokens in a single API request, causing
this error:
```
openai.BadRequestError: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'Requested 673477 tokens, max 300000 tokens per request'}}
```
The issue occurred because:
- The code chunks texts by `embedding_ctx_length` (8191 tokens per
chunk)
- Then batches chunks by `chunk_size` (default 1000 chunks per request)
- **But didn't check**: Total tokens per batch against OpenAI's 300k
limit
- Result: `1000 chunks × 8191 tokens = 8,191,000 tokens` → Exceeds
limit!
## Solution
This PR implements dynamic batching that respects the 300k token limit:
1. **Added constant**: `MAX_TOKENS_PER_REQUEST = 300000`
2. **Track token counts**: Calculate actual tokens for each chunk
3. **Dynamic batching**: Instead of fixed `chunk_size` batches,
accumulate chunks until approaching the 300k limit
4. **Applied to both sync and async**: Fixed both
`_get_len_safe_embeddings` and `_aget_len_safe_embeddings`
## Changes
- Modified `langchain_openai/embeddings/base.py`:
- Added `MAX_TOKENS_PER_REQUEST` constant
- Replaced fixed-size batching with token-aware dynamic batching
- Applied to both sync (line ~478) and async (line ~527) methods
- Added test in `tests/unit_tests/embeddings/test_base.py`:
- `test_embeddings_respects_token_limit()` - Verifies large document
sets are properly batched
## Testing
All existing tests pass (280 passed, 4 xfailed, 1 xpassed).
New test verifies:
- Large document sets (500 texts × 1000 tokens = 500k tokens) are split
into multiple API calls
- Each API call respects the 300k token limit
## Usage
After this fix, users can embed large document sets without errors:
```python
from langchain_openai import OpenAIEmbeddings
from langchain_chroma import Chroma
from langchain_text_splitters import CharacterTextSplitter
# This will now work without exceeding token limits
embeddings = OpenAIEmbeddings()
documents = CharacterTextSplitter().split_documents(large_documents)
Chroma.from_documents(documents, embeddings)
```
Resolves#31227
---------
Co-authored-by: Kaparthy Reddy <kaparthyreddy@Kaparthys-MacBook-Air.local>
Co-authored-by: Chester Curme <chester.curme@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mason Daugherty <mason@langchain.dev>
Co-authored-by: Mason Daugherty <github@mdrxy.com>
Removed:
- `libs/core/langchain_core/chat_history.py`: `add_user_message` and
`add_ai_message` in favor of `add_messages` and `aadd_messages`
- `libs/core/langchain_core/language_models/base.py`: `predict`,
`predict_messages`, and async versions in favor of `invoke`. removed
`_all_required_field_names` since it was a wrapper on
`get_pydantic_field_names`
- `libs/core/langchain_core/language_models/chat_models.py`:
`callback_manager` param in favor of `callbacks`. `__call__` and
`call_as_llm` method in favor of `invoke`
- `libs/core/langchain_core/language_models/llms.py`: `callback_manager`
param in favor of `callbacks`. `__call__`, `predict`, `apredict`, and
`apredict_messages` methods in favor of `invoke`
- `libs/core/langchain_core/prompts/chat.py`: `from_role_strings` and
`from_strings` in favor of `from_messages`
- `libs/core/langchain_core/prompts/pipeline.py`: removed
`PipelinePromptTemplate`
- `libs/core/langchain_core/prompts/prompt.py`: `input_variables` param
on `from_file` as it wasn't used
- `libs/core/langchain_core/tools/base.py`: `callback_manager` param in
favor of `callbacks`
- `libs/core/langchain_core/tracers/context.py`: `tracing_enabled` in
favor of `tracing_enabled_v2`
- `libs/core/langchain_core/tracers/langchain_v1.py`: entire module
- `libs/core/langchain_core/utils/loading.py`: entire module,
`try_load_from_hub`
- `libs/core/langchain_core/vectorstores/in_memory.py`: `upsert` in
favor of `add_documents`
- `libs/standard-tests/langchain_tests/integration_tests/chat_models.py`
and `libs/standard-tests/langchain_tests/unit_tests/chat_models.py`:
`tool_choice_value` as models should accept `tool_choice="any"`
- `langchain` will consequently no longer expose these items if it was
previously
---------
Co-authored-by: Mohammad Mohtashim <45242107+keenborder786@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Caspar Broekhuizen <caspar@langchain.dev>
Co-authored-by: ccurme <chester.curme@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Christophe Bornet <cbornet@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sadra Barikbin <sadraqazvin1@yahoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vadym Barda <vadim.barda@gmail.com>
