Fixes#29010
This PR updates the example for FewShotChatMessagePromptTemplate by
modifying the human input prompt to include a more descriptive and
user-friendly question format ('What is {input}?') instead of just
'{input}'. This change enhances clarity and usability in the
documentation example.
Co-authored-by: Erick Friis <erick@langchain.dev>
Fixes#27411
**Description:** Adds `template_format` to the `ImagePromptTemplate`
class and updates passing in the `template_format` parameter from
ChatPromptTemplate instead of the hardcoded "f-string".
Also updated docs and typing related to `template_format` to be more
up-to-date and specific.
**Dependencies:** None
**Add tests and docs**: Added unit tests to validate fix. Needed to
update `test_chat` snapshot due to adding new attribute
`template_format` in `ImagePromptTemplate`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Vadym Barda <vadym@langchain.dev>
template_format is an init argument on ChatPromptTemplate but not an
attribute on the object so was getting shoved into
StructuredPrompt.structured_ouptut_kwargs
- **Description:** fix "template" not allowed as prompt param
- **Issue:** #26058
- **Dependencies:** none
- [ ] **Add tests and docs**: If you're adding a new integration, please
include
1. a test for the integration, preferably unit tests that do not rely on
network access,
2. an example notebook showing its use. It lives in
`docs/docs/integrations` directory.
- [ ] **Lint and test**: Run `make format`, `make lint` and `make test`
from the root of the package(s) you've modified. See contribution
guidelines for more: https://python.langchain.com/docs/contributing/
Additional guidelines:
- Make sure optional dependencies are imported within a function.
- Please do not add dependencies to pyproject.toml files (even optional
ones) unless they are required for unit tests.
- Most PRs should not touch more than one package.
- Changes should be backwards compatible.
- If you are adding something to community, do not re-import it in
langchain.
If no one reviews your PR within a few days, please @-mention one of
baskaryan, efriis, eyurtsev, ccurme, vbarda, hwchase17.
---------
Co-authored-by: Erick Friis <erick@langchain.dev>
Ruff doesn't know about the python version in
`[tool.poetry.dependencies]`. It can get it from
`project.requires-python`.
Notes:
* poetry seems to have issues getting the python constraints from
`requires-python` and using `python` in per dependency constraints. So I
had to duplicate the info. I will open an issue on poetry.
* `inspect.isclass()` doesn't work correctly with `GenericAlias`
(`list[...]`, `dict[..., ...]`) on Python <3.11 so I added some `not
isinstance(type, GenericAlias)` checks:
Python 3.11
```pycon
>>> import inspect
>>> inspect.isclass(list)
True
>>> inspect.isclass(list[str])
False
```
Python 3.9
```pycon
>>> import inspect
>>> inspect.isclass(list)
True
>>> inspect.isclass(list[str])
True
```
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
Thank you for contributing to LangChain!
- [ ] **PR title**: "langchain-core: Fix type"
- The file to modify is located in
/libs/core/langchain_core/prompts/base.py
- [ ] **PR message**:
- **Description:** The change is a type for the inner input variable,
the type go from dict to Any. This change is required since the method
_validate input expects a type that is not only a dictionary.
- **Dependencies:** There are no dependencies for this change
- [ ] **Add tests and docs**:
1. A test is not needed. This error occurs because I overrode a portion
of the _validate_input method, which is causing a 'beartype' to raise an
error.
This PR does an aesthetic sort of the config object attributes. This
will make it a bit easier to go back and forth between pydantic v1 and
pydantic v2 on the 0.3.x branch
**Description**: After reviewing the prompts API, it is clear that the
only way a user can explicitly mark an input variable as optional is
through the `MessagePlaceholder.optional` attribute. Otherwise, the user
must explicitly pass in the `input_variables` expected to be used in the
`BasePromptTemplate`, which will be validated upon execution. Therefore,
to semantically handle a `MessagePlaceholder` `variable_name` as
optional, we will treat the `variable_name` of `MessagePlaceholder` as a
`partial_variable` if it has been marked as optional. This approach
aligns with how the `variable_name` of `MessagePlaceholder` is already
handled
[here](https://github.com/keenborder786/langchain/blob/optional_input_variables/libs/core/langchain_core/prompts/chat.py#L991).
Additionally, an attribute `optional_variable` has been added to
`BasePromptTemplate`, and the `variable_name` of `MessagePlaceholder` is
also made part of `optional_variable` when marked as optional.
Moreover, the `get_input_schema` method has been updated for
`BasePromptTemplate` to differentiate between optional and non-optional
variables.
**Issue**: #22832, #21425
---------
Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
- Description: Add support for `path` and `detail` keys in
`ImagePromptTemplate`. Previously, only variables associated with the
`url` key were considered. This PR allows for the inclusion of a local
image path and a detail parameter as input to the format method.
- Issues:
- fixes#20820
- related to #22024
- Dependencies: None
- Twitter handle: @DeschampsTho5
---------
Co-authored-by: tdeschamps <tdeschamps@kameleoon.com>
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eugene@langchain.dev>
The prompt template variable detection only worked for singly-nested
sections because we just kept track of whether we were in a section and
then set that to false as soon as we encountered an end block. i.e. the
following:
```
{{#outerSection}}
{{variableThatShouldntShowUp}}
{{#nestedSection}}
{{nestedVal}}
{{/nestedSection}}
{{anotherVariableThatShouldntShowUp}}
{{/outerSection}}
```
Would yield `['outerSection', 'anotherVariableThatShouldntShowUp']` as
input_variables (whereas it should just yield `['outerSection']`). This
fixes that by keeping track of the current depth and using a stack.
- **Description:** Add optional max_messages to MessagePlaceholder
- **Issue:**
[16096](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/issues/16096)
- **Dependencies:** None
- **Twitter handle:** @davedecaprio
Sometimes it's better to limit the history in the prompt itself rather
than the memory. This is needed if you want different prompts in the
chain to have different history lengths.
---------
Co-authored-by: Harrison Chase <hw.chase.17@gmail.com>