18db07c292
Adding `create_react_agent` and introducing `langchain.agents`!
## Enhanced Structured Output
`create_react_agent` supports coercion of outputs to structured data
types like `pydantic` models, dataclasses, typed dicts, or JSON schemas
specifications.
### Structural Changes
In langgraph < 1.0, `create_react_agent` implemented support for
structured output via an additional LLM call to the model after the
standard model / tool calling loop finished. This introduced extra
expense and was unnecessary.
This new version implements structured output support in the main loop,
allowing a model to choose between calling tools or generating
structured output (or both).
The same basic pattern for structured output generation works:
```py
from langchain.agents import create_react_agent
from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage
from pydantic import BaseModel
class Weather(BaseModel):
temperature: float
condition: str
def weather_tool(city: str) -> str:
"""Get the weather for a city."""
return f"it's sunny and 70 degrees in {city}"
agent = create_react_agent("openai:gpt-4o-mini", tools=[weather_tool], response_format=Weather)
print(repr(result["structured_response"]))
#> Weather(temperature=70.0, condition='sunny')
```
### Advanced Configuration
The new API exposes two ways to configure how structured output is
generated. Under the hood, LangChain will attempt to pick the best
approach if not explicitly specified. That is, if provider native
support is available for a given model, that takes priority over
artificial tool calling.
1. Artificial tool calling (the default for most models)
LangChain generates a tool (or tools) under the hood that match the
schema of your response format. When the model calls those tools,
LangChain coerces the args to the desired format. Note, LangChain does
not validate outputs adhering to JSON schema specifications.
<details>
<summary>Extended example</summary>
```py
from langchain.agents import create_react_agent
from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage
from langchain.agents.structured_output import ToolStrategy
from pydantic import BaseModel
class Weather(BaseModel):
temperature: float
condition: str
def weather_tool(city: str) -> str:
"""Get the weather for a city."""
return f"it's sunny and 70 degrees in {city}"
agent = create_react_agent(
"openai:gpt-4o-mini",
tools=[weather_tool],
response_format=ToolStrategy(
schema=Weather, tool_message_content="Final Weather result generated"
),
)
result = agent.invoke({"messages": [HumanMessage("What's the weather in Tokyo?")]})
for message in result["messages"]:
message.pretty_print()
"""
================================ Human Message =================================
What's the weather in Tokyo?
================================== Ai Message ==================================
Tool Calls:
weather_tool (call_Gg933BMHMwck50Q39dtBjXm7)
Call ID: call_Gg933BMHMwck50Q39dtBjXm7
Args:
city: Tokyo
================================= Tool Message =================================
Name: weather_tool
it's sunny and 70 degrees in Tokyo
================================== Ai Message ==================================
Tool Calls:
Weather (call_9xOkYUM7PuEXl9DQq9sWGv5l)
Call ID: call_9xOkYUM7PuEXl9DQq9sWGv5l
Args:
temperature: 70
condition: sunny
================================= Tool Message =================================
Name: Weather
Final Weather result generated
"""
print(repr(result["structured_response"]))
#> Weather(temperature=70.0, condition='sunny')
```
</details>
2. Provider implementations (limited to OpenAI, Groq)
Some providers support structured output generating directly. For those
cases, we offer the `ProviderStrategy` hint:
<details>
<summary>Extended example</summary>
```py
from langchain.agents import create_react_agent
from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage
from langchain.agents.structured_output import ProviderStrategy
from pydantic import BaseModel
class Weather(BaseModel):
temperature: float
condition: str
def weather_tool(city: str) -> str:
"""Get the weather for a city."""
return f"it's sunny and 70 degrees in {city}"
agent = create_react_agent(
"openai:gpt-4o-mini",
tools=[weather_tool],
response_format=ProviderStrategy(Weather),
)
result = agent.invoke({"messages": [HumanMessage("What's the weather in Tokyo?")]})
for message in result["messages"]:
message.pretty_print()
"""
================================ Human Message =================================
What's the weather in Tokyo?
================================== Ai Message ==================================
Tool Calls:
weather_tool (call_OFJq1FngIXS6cvjWv5nfSFZp)
Call ID: call_OFJq1FngIXS6cvjWv5nfSFZp
Args:
city: Tokyo
================================= Tool Message =================================
Name: weather_tool
it's sunny and 70 degrees in Tokyo
================================== Ai Message ==================================
{"temperature":70,"condition":"sunny"}
Weather(temperature=70.0, condition='sunny')
"""
print(repr(result["structured_response"]))
#> Weather(temperature=70.0, condition='sunny')
```
Note! The final tool message has the custom content provided by the dev.
</details>
Prompted output was previously supported and is no longer supported via
the `response_format` argument to `create_react_agent`. If there's
significant demand for this, we'd be happy to engineer a solution.
## Error Handling
`create_react_agent` now exposes an API for managing errors associated
with structured output generation. There are two common problems with
structured output generation (w/ artificial tool calling):
1. **Parsing error** -- the model generates data that doesn't match the
desired structure for the output
2. **Multiple tool calls error** -- the model generates 2 or more tool
calls associated with structured output schemas
A developer can control the desired behavior for this via the
`handle_errors` arg to `ToolStrategy`.
<details>
<summary>Extended example</summary>
```py
from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage
from pydantic import BaseModel
from langchain.agents import create_react_agent
from langchain.agents.structured_output import StructuredOutputValidationError, ToolStrategy
class Weather(BaseModel):
temperature: float
condition: str
def weather_tool(city: str) -> str:
"""Get the weather for a city."""
return f"it's sunny and 70 degrees in {city}"
def handle_validation_error(error: Exception) -> str:
if isinstance(error, StructuredOutputValidationError):
return (
f"Please call the {error.tool_name} call again with the correct arguments. "
f"Your mistake was: {error.source}"
)
raise error
agent = create_react_agent(
"openai:gpt-5",
tools=[weather_tool],
response_format=ToolStrategy(
schema=Weather,
handle_errors=handle_validation_error,
),
)
```
</details>
## Error Handling for Tool Calling
Tools fail for two main reasons:
1. **Invocation failure** -- the args generated by the model for the
tool are incorrect (missing, incompatible data types, etc)
2. **Execution failure** -- the tool execution itself fails due to a
developer error, network error, or some other exception.
By default, when tool **invocation** fails, the react agent will return
an artificial `ToolMessage` to the model asking it to correct its
mistakes and retry.
Now, when tool **execution** fails, the react agent raises the
`ToolException` by default instead of asking the model to retry. This
helps to avoid looping that should be avoided due to the aforementioned
issues.
Developers can configure their desired behavior for retries / error
handling via the `handle_tool_errors` arg to `ToolNode`.
## Pre-Bound Models
`create_react_agent` no longer supports inputs to `model` that have been
pre-bound w/ tools or other configuration. To properly support
structured output generation, the agent itself needs the power to bind
tools + structured output kwargs.
This also makes the devx cleaner - it's always expected that `model` is
an instance of `BaseChatModel` (or `str` that we coerce into a chat
model instance).
Dynamic model functions can return a pre-bound model **IF** structured
output is not also used. Dynamic model functions can then bind tools /
structured output logic.
## Import Changes
Users should now use `create_react_agent` from `langchain.agents`
instead of `langgraph.prebuilts`.
Other imports have a similar migration path, `ToolNode` and `AgentState`
for example.
* `chat_agent_executor.py` -> `react_agent.py`
Some notes:
1. Disabled blockbuster + some linting in `langchain/agents` -- beyond
ideal, but necessary to get this across the line for the alpha. We
should re-enable before official release.
🦜️🔗 LangChain
⚡ Building applications with LLMs through composability ⚡
Looking for the JS/TS version? Check out LangChain.js.
To help you ship LangChain apps to production faster, check out LangSmith. LangSmith is a unified developer platform for building, testing, and monitoring LLM applications.
Quick Install
pip install langchain
🤔 What is this?
Large language models (LLMs) are emerging as a transformative technology, enabling developers to build applications that they previously could not. However, using these LLMs in isolation is often insufficient for creating a truly powerful app - the real power comes when you can combine them with other sources of computation or knowledge.
This library aims to assist in the development of those types of applications. Common examples of these applications include:
❓ Question answering with RAG
- Documentation
- End-to-end Example: Chat LangChain and repo
🧱 Extracting structured output
- Documentation
- End-to-end Example: SQL Llama2 Template
🤖 Chatbots
- Documentation
- End-to-end Example: Web LangChain (web researcher chatbot) and repo
📖 Documentation
Please see our full documentation on:
- Getting started (installation, setting up the environment, simple examples)
- How-To examples (demos, integrations, helper functions)
- Reference (full API docs)
- Resources (high-level explanation of core concepts)
🚀 What can this help with?
There are five main areas that LangChain is designed to help with. These are, in increasing order of complexity:
📃 Models and Prompts:
This includes prompt management, prompt optimization, a generic interface for all LLMs, and common utilities for working with chat models and LLMs.
🔗 Chains:
Chains go beyond a single LLM call and involve sequences of calls (whether to an LLM or a different utility). LangChain provides a standard interface for chains, lots of integrations with other tools, and end-to-end chains for common applications.
📚 Retrieval Augmented Generation:
Retrieval Augmented Generation involves specific types of chains that first interact with an external data source to fetch data for use in the generation step. Examples include summarization of long pieces of text and question/answering over specific data sources.
🤖 Agents:
Agents involve an LLM making decisions about which Actions to take, taking that Action, seeing an Observation, and repeating that until done. LangChain provides a standard interface for agents, a selection of agents to choose from, and examples of end-to-end agents.
🧐 Evaluation:
Generative models are notoriously hard to evaluate with traditional metrics. One new way of evaluating them is using language models themselves to do the evaluation. LangChain provides some prompts/chains for assisting in this.
For more information on these concepts, please see our full documentation.
💁 Contributing
As an open-source project in a rapidly developing field, we are extremely open to contributions, whether it be in the form of a new feature, improved infrastructure, or better documentation.
For detailed information on how to contribute, see the Contributing Guide.