William FH c8f3615aa6 Support evaluating runnables and arbitrary functions (#8698) ...

Added a couple of "integration tests" for these that I ran.

Main design point of feedback: at this point, would it just be better to
have separate arguments for each type? Little confusing what is or isn't
supported and what is the intended usage at this point since I try to
wrap the function as runnable or pack or unpack chains/llms.

```
run_on_dataset(
...
llm_or_chain_factory = None,
llm = None,
chain = NOne,
runnable=None,
function=None
):
# raise error if none set
```

Downside with runnables and arbitrary function support is that you get
much less helpful validation and error messages, but I don't think we
should block you from this, at least.

2023-08-04 16:39:04 -07:00

..

experimental

bump experimental to 008 (#8490)

2023-07-30 07:28:18 -07:00

langchain

Support evaluating runnables and arbitrary functions (#8698)

2023-08-04 16:39:04 -07:00