mirror of
https://github.com/linuxkit/linuxkit.git
synced 2025-07-20 01:29:07 +00:00
Add Contributing doc
Signed-off-by: Justin Cormack <justin.cormack@docker.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
51b4e20154
commit
b4804b69e8
260
src/moby/CONTRIBUTING.md
Normal file
260
src/moby/CONTRIBUTING.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
|
||||
# Contributing to the Moby tool
|
||||
|
||||
Want to hack on this project? Awesome! Here are instructions to get you started.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reporting security issues
|
||||
|
||||
The Moby maintainers take security seriously. If you discover a security
|
||||
issue, please bring it to their attention right away!
|
||||
|
||||
Please **DO NOT** file a public issue, instead send your report privately to
|
||||
[security@docker.com](mailto:security@docker.com).
|
||||
|
||||
Security reports are greatly appreciated and we will publicly thank you for it.
|
||||
We also like to send gifts—if you're into Docker schwag, make sure to let
|
||||
us know. We currently do not offer a paid security bounty program, but are not
|
||||
ruling it out in the future.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reporting other issues
|
||||
|
||||
A great way to contribute to the project is to send a detailed report when you
|
||||
encounter an issue. We always appreciate a well-written, thorough bug report,
|
||||
and will thank you for it!
|
||||
|
||||
Check that [our issue database](https://github.com/moby/tool/issues)
|
||||
doesn't already include that problem or suggestion before submitting an issue.
|
||||
If you find a match, you can use the "subscribe" button to get notified on
|
||||
updates. Do *not* leave random "+1" or "I have this too" comments, as they
|
||||
only clutter the discussion, and don't help resolving it. However, if you
|
||||
have ways to reproduce the issue or have additional information that may help
|
||||
resolving the issue, please leave a comment.
|
||||
|
||||
Also include the steps required to reproduce the problem if possible and
|
||||
applicable. This information will help us review and fix your issue faster.
|
||||
When sending lengthy log-files, consider posting them as a gist (https://gist.github.com).
|
||||
Don't forget to remove sensitive data from your logfiles before posting (you can
|
||||
replace those parts with "REDACTED").
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick contribution tips and guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
This section gives the experienced contributor some tips and guidelines.
|
||||
|
||||
### Pull requests are always welcome
|
||||
|
||||
Not sure if that typo is worth a pull request? Found a bug and know how to fix
|
||||
it? Do it! We will appreciate it. Any significant improvement should be
|
||||
documented as [a GitHub issue](https://github.com/moby/tool/issues) before
|
||||
anybody starts working on it.
|
||||
|
||||
We are always thrilled to receive pull requests. We do our best to process them
|
||||
quickly. If your pull request is not accepted on the first try, don't get
|
||||
discouraged! Our contributor's guide explains [the review process we
|
||||
use for simple changes](https://docs.docker.com/opensource/workflow/make-a-contribution/).
|
||||
|
||||
### Design and cleanup proposals
|
||||
|
||||
You can propose new designs for existing features. You can also design
|
||||
entirely new features. We really appreciate contributors who want to refactor or
|
||||
otherwise cleanup our project. For information on making these types of
|
||||
contributions, see [the advanced contribution
|
||||
section](https://docs.docker.com/opensource/workflow/advanced-contributing/) in
|
||||
the contributors guide.
|
||||
|
||||
We try hard to keep Moby projects lean and focused. This tool can't do everything for
|
||||
everybody. This means that we might decide against incorporating a new feature.
|
||||
However, there might be a way to implement that feature *on top of* this tool, or
|
||||
as a standalone project.
|
||||
|
||||
### Commit Messages
|
||||
|
||||
Commit messages must start with a capitalized and short summary (max. 50 chars)
|
||||
written in the imperative, followed by an optional, more detailed explanatory
|
||||
text which is separated from the summary by an empty line.
|
||||
|
||||
Commit messages should follow best practices, including explaining the context
|
||||
of the problem and how it was solved, including in caveats or follow up changes
|
||||
required. They should tell the story of the change and provide readers
|
||||
understanding of what led to it.
|
||||
|
||||
If you're lost about what this even means, please see [How to Write a Git
|
||||
Commit Message](http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/) for a start.
|
||||
|
||||
In practice, the best approach to maintaining a nice commit message is to
|
||||
leverage a `git add -p` and `git commit --amend` to formulate a solid
|
||||
changeset. This allows one to piece together a change, as information becomes
|
||||
available.
|
||||
|
||||
If you squash a series of commits, don't just submit that. Re-write the commit
|
||||
message, as if the series of commits was a single stroke of brilliance.
|
||||
|
||||
That said, there is no requirement to have a single commit for a PR, as long as
|
||||
each commit tells the story. For example, if there is a feature that requires a
|
||||
package, it might make sense to have the package in a separate commit then have
|
||||
a subsequent commit that uses it.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember, you're telling part of the story with the commit message. Don't make
|
||||
your chapter weird.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Review
|
||||
|
||||
Code review comments may be added to your pull request. Discuss, then make the
|
||||
suggested modifications and push additional commits to your feature branch. Post
|
||||
a comment after pushing. New commits show up in the pull request automatically,
|
||||
but the reviewers are notified only when you comment.
|
||||
|
||||
Pull requests must be cleanly rebased on top of master without multiple branches
|
||||
mixed into the PR.
|
||||
|
||||
**Git tip**: If your PR no longer merges cleanly, use `rebase master` in your
|
||||
feature branch to update your pull request rather than `merge master`.
|
||||
|
||||
Before you make a pull request, squash your commits into logical units of work
|
||||
using `git rebase -i` and `git push -f`. A logical unit of work is a consistent
|
||||
set of patches that should be reviewed together: for example, upgrading the
|
||||
version of a vendored dependency and taking advantage of its now available new
|
||||
feature constitute two separate units of work. Implementing a new function and
|
||||
calling it in another file constitute a single logical unit of work. The very
|
||||
high majority of submissions should have a single commit, so if in doubt: squash
|
||||
down to one.
|
||||
|
||||
After every commit, [make sure the test suite passes]
|
||||
(https://docs.docker.com/opensource/project/test-and-docs/). Include documentation
|
||||
changes in the same pull request so that a revert would remove all traces of
|
||||
the feature or fix.
|
||||
|
||||
Include an issue reference like `Closes #XXXX` or `Fixes #XXXX` in commits that
|
||||
close an issue. Including references automatically closes the issue on a merge.
|
||||
|
||||
### Merge approval
|
||||
|
||||
Docker maintainers use LGTM (Looks Good To Me) in comments or GitHub approval
|
||||
on the code review to indicate acceptance.
|
||||
|
||||
A change requires at least one LGTM from a maintainers of each component
|
||||
affected. A list of maintainers can be found in the [MAINTAINERS](MAINTAINERS)
|
||||
file.
|
||||
|
||||
### Community Guidelines and Code of Conduct
|
||||
|
||||
When contributing to this project, we expect you to respect our community
|
||||
guidelines and [code of conduct](https://github.com/docker/code-of-conduct)
|
||||
|
||||
We want to keep the community awesome, growing and collaborative. We need your
|
||||
help to keep it that way. To help with this we've come up with some general
|
||||
guidelines for the community as a whole:
|
||||
|
||||
* Be nice: Be courteous, respectful and polite to fellow community members:
|
||||
no regional, racial, gender, or other abuse will be tolerated. We like
|
||||
nice people way better than mean ones!
|
||||
|
||||
* Encourage diversity and participation: Make everyone in our community feel
|
||||
welcome, regardless of their background and the extent of their
|
||||
contributions, and do everything possible to encourage participation in
|
||||
our community.
|
||||
|
||||
* Keep it legal: Basically, don't get us in trouble. Share only content that
|
||||
you own, do not share private or sensitive information, and don't break
|
||||
the law.
|
||||
|
||||
* Stay on topic: Make sure that you are posting to the correct channel and
|
||||
avoid off-topic discussions. Remember when you update an issue or respond
|
||||
to an email you are potentially sending to a large number of people. Please
|
||||
consider this before you update. Also remember that nobody likes spam.
|
||||
|
||||
* Don't send email to the maintainers: There's no need to send email to the
|
||||
maintainers to ask them to investigate an issue or to take a look at a
|
||||
pull request. Instead of sending an email, GitHub mentions should be
|
||||
used to ping maintainers to review a pull request, a proposal or an
|
||||
issue.
|
||||
|
||||
### Guideline violations — 3 strikes method
|
||||
|
||||
The point of this section is not to find opportunities to punish people, but we
|
||||
do need a fair way to deal with people who are making our community suck.
|
||||
|
||||
1. First occurrence: We'll give you a friendly, but public reminder that the
|
||||
behavior is inappropriate according to our guidelines.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Second occurrence: We will send you a private message with a warning that
|
||||
any additional violations will result in removal from the community.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Third occurrence: Depending on the violation, we may need to delete or ban
|
||||
your account.
|
||||
|
||||
**Notes:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Obvious spammers are banned on first occurrence. If we don't do this, we'll
|
||||
have spam all over the place.
|
||||
|
||||
* Violations are forgiven after 6 months of good behavior, and we won't hold a
|
||||
grudge.
|
||||
|
||||
* People who commit minor infractions will get some education, rather than
|
||||
hammering them in the 3 strikes process.
|
||||
|
||||
* The rules apply equally to everyone in the community, no matter how much
|
||||
you've contributed.
|
||||
|
||||
* Extreme violations of a threatening, abusive, destructive or illegal nature
|
||||
will be addressed immediately and are not subject to 3 strikes or forgiveness.
|
||||
|
||||
* Contact abuse@docker.com to report abuse or appeal violations. In the case of
|
||||
appeals, we know that mistakes happen, and we'll work with you to come up with a
|
||||
fair solution if there has been a misunderstanding.
|
||||
|
||||
### Sign your work
|
||||
|
||||
The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the patch. Your
|
||||
signature certifies that you wrote the patch or otherwise have the right to pass
|
||||
it on as an open-source patch. The rules are pretty simple: if you can certify
|
||||
the below (from [developercertificate.org](http://developercertificate.org/)):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Developer Certificate of Origin
|
||||
Version 1.1
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
|
||||
1 Letterman Drive
|
||||
Suite D4700
|
||||
San Francisco, CA, 94129
|
||||
|
||||
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
|
||||
license document, but changing it is not allowed.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
|
||||
|
||||
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
|
||||
|
||||
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
|
||||
have the right to submit it under the open source license
|
||||
indicated in the file; or
|
||||
|
||||
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
|
||||
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
|
||||
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
|
||||
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
|
||||
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
|
||||
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
|
||||
in the file; or
|
||||
|
||||
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
|
||||
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
|
||||
it.
|
||||
|
||||
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
|
||||
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
|
||||
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
|
||||
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
|
||||
this project or the open source license(s) involved.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Then you just add a line to every git commit message:
|
||||
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@email.com>
|
||||
|
||||
Use your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
|
||||
|
||||
If you set your `user.name` and `user.email` git configs, you can sign your
|
||||
commit automatically with `git commit -s`.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user