From fb8fd05821b83cac5e75caf3cd2e7d7f939e9df8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anna-Maria Gleixner Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:13:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 037/418] hrtimer: Make remote enqueue decision less restrictive The current decision whether a timer can be queued on a remote CPU checks for timer->expiry <= remote_cpu_base.expires_next. This is too restrictive because a timer with the same expiry time as an existing timer will be enqueued on right-hand size of the existing timer inside the rbtree, i.e. behind the first expiring timer. So its safe to allow enqueuing timers with the same expiry time as the first expiring timer on a remote CPU base. Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior --- kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c index 35d7d0c8c3d6..1b2866645c83 100644 --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ hrtimer_check_target(struct hrtimer *timer, struct hrtimer_clock_base *new_base) ktime_t expires; expires = ktime_sub(hrtimer_get_expires(timer), new_base->offset); - return expires <= new_base->cpu_base->expires_next; + return expires < new_base->cpu_base->expires_next; } static inline -- 2.17.1