linuxkit/kernel/patches-4.14.x-rt/0035-hrtimer-Unify-handling-of-hrtimer-remove.patch
Tiejun Chen a1d47ff766 update -rt to 4.14.53-rt34
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.china@gmail.com>
2018-07-06 14:02:07 +08:00

95 lines
3.5 KiB
Diff

From 748812cb4f5a3b85cb2ba72c6edb68e390137b84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:13:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 035/418] hrtimer: Unify handling of hrtimer remove
When the first hrtimer on the current CPU is removed,
hrtimer_force_reprogram() is invoked but only when
CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y and hrtimer_cpu_base.hres_active is set.
hrtimer_force_reprogram() updates hrtimer_cpu_base.expires_next and
reprograms the clock event device. When CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y and
hrtimer_cpu_base.hres_active is set, a pointless hrtimer interrupt can be
prevented.
hrtimer_check_target() makes the 'can remote enqueue' decision. As soon as
hrtimer_check_target() is unconditionally available and
hrtimer_cpu_base.expires_next is updated by hrtimer_reprogram(),
hrtimer_force_reprogram() needs to be available unconditionally as well to
prevent the following scenario with CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=n:
- the first hrtimer on this CPU is removed and hrtimer_force_reprogram() is
not executed
- CPU goes idle (next timer is calculated and hrtimers are taken into
account)
- a hrtimer is enqueued remote on the idle CPU: hrtimer_check_target()
compares expiry value and hrtimer_cpu_base.expires_next. The expiry value
is after expires_next, so the hrtimer is enqueued. This timer will fire
late, if it expires before the effective first hrtimer on this CPU and
the comparison was with an outdated expires_next value.
To prevent this scenario, make hrtimer_force_reprogram() unconditional
except the effective reprogramming part, which gets eliminated by the
compiler in the CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=n case.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index 5fd669dd46be..ce9a3ef7a796 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -523,9 +523,6 @@ hrtimer_force_reprogram(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, int skip_equal)
{
ktime_t expires_next;
- if (!__hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base))
- return;
-
expires_next = __hrtimer_get_next_event(cpu_base);
if (skip_equal && expires_next == cpu_base->expires_next)
@@ -534,6 +531,9 @@ hrtimer_force_reprogram(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, int skip_equal)
cpu_base->expires_next = expires_next;
/*
+ * If hres is not active, hardware does not have to be
+ * reprogrammed yet.
+ *
* If a hang was detected in the last timer interrupt then we
* leave the hang delay active in the hardware. We want the
* system to make progress. That also prevents the following
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ hrtimer_force_reprogram(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, int skip_equal)
* set. So we'd effectivly block all timers until the T2 event
* fires.
*/
- if (cpu_base->hang_detected)
+ if (!__hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base) || cpu_base->hang_detected)
return;
tick_program_event(cpu_base->expires_next, 1);
@@ -848,7 +848,6 @@ static void __remove_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *timer,
if (!timerqueue_del(&base->active, &timer->node))
cpu_base->active_bases &= ~(1 << base->index);
-#ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
/*
* Note: If reprogram is false we do not update
* cpu_base->next_timer. This happens when we remove the first
@@ -859,7 +858,6 @@ static void __remove_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *timer,
*/
if (reprogram && timer == cpu_base->next_timer)
hrtimer_force_reprogram(cpu_base, 1);
-#endif
}
/*
--
2.17.1