luet/vendor/github.com/crillab/gophersat/explain/mus.go
Ettore Di Giacinto 77c4bf1fd1 update vendor
2021-08-07 14:46:05 +02:00

214 lines
7.6 KiB
Go

package explain
import (
"fmt"
"github.com/crillab/gophersat/solver"
)
// MUSMaxSat returns a Minimal Unsatisfiable Subset for the problem using the MaxSat strategy.
// A MUS is an unsatisfiable subset such that, if any of its clause is removed,
// the problem becomes satisfiable.
// A MUS can be useful to understand why a problem is UNSAT, but MUSes are expensive to compute since
// a SAT solver must be called several times on parts of the original problem to find them.
// With the MaxSat strategy, the function computes the MUS through several calls to MaxSat.
func (pb *Problem) MUSMaxSat() (mus *Problem, err error) {
pb2 := pb.clone()
nbVars := pb2.NbVars
NbClauses := pb2.NbClauses
weights := make([]int, NbClauses) // Weights of each clause
relaxLits := make([]solver.Lit, NbClauses) // Set of all relax lits
relaxLit := nbVars + 1 // Index of last used relax lit
for i, clause := range pb2.Clauses {
pb2.Clauses[i] = append(clause, relaxLit)
relaxLits[i] = solver.IntToLit(int32(relaxLit))
weights[i] = 1
relaxLit++
}
prob := solver.ParseSlice(pb2.Clauses)
prob.SetCostFunc(relaxLits, weights)
s := solver.New(prob)
s.Verbose = pb.Options.Verbose
var musClauses [][]int
done := make([]bool, NbClauses) // Indicates whether a clause is already part of MUS or not yet
for {
cost := s.Minimize()
if cost == -1 {
return makeMus(nbVars, musClauses), nil
}
if cost == 0 {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("cannot extract MUS from satisfiable problem")
}
model := s.Model()
for i, clause := range pb.Clauses {
if !done[i] && !satClause(clause, model) {
// The clause is part of the MUS
pb2.Clauses = append(pb2.Clauses, []int{-(nbVars + i + 1)}) // Now, relax lit has to be false
pb2.NbClauses++
musClauses = append(musClauses, clause)
done[i] = true
// Make it a hard clause before restarting solver
lits := make([]solver.Lit, len(clause))
for j, lit := range clause {
lits[j] = solver.IntToLit(int32(lit))
}
s.AppendClause(solver.NewClause(lits))
}
}
if pb.Options.Verbose {
fmt.Printf("c Currently %d/%d clauses in MUS\n", len(musClauses), NbClauses)
}
prob = solver.ParseSlice(pb2.Clauses)
prob.SetCostFunc(relaxLits, weights)
s = solver.New(prob)
s.Verbose = pb.Options.Verbose
}
}
// true iff the clause is satisfied by the model
func satClause(clause []int, model []bool) bool {
for _, lit := range clause {
if (lit > 0 && model[lit-1]) || (lit < 0 && !model[-lit-1]) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
func makeMus(nbVars int, clauses [][]int) *Problem {
mus := &Problem{
Clauses: clauses,
NbVars: nbVars,
NbClauses: len(clauses),
units: make([]int, nbVars),
}
for _, clause := range clauses {
if len(clause) == 1 {
lit := clause[0]
if lit > 0 {
mus.units[lit-1] = 1
} else {
mus.units[-lit-1] = -1
}
}
}
return mus
}
// MUSInsertion returns a Minimal Unsatisfiable Subset for the problem using the insertion method.
// A MUS is an unsatisfiable subset such that, if any of its clause is removed,
// the problem becomes satisfiable.
// A MUS can be useful to understand why a problem is UNSAT, but MUSes are expensive to compute since
// a SAT solver must be called several times on parts of the original problem to find them.
// The insertion algorithm is efficient is many cases, as it calls the same solver several times in a row.
// However, in some cases, the number of calls will be higher than using other methods.
// For instance, if called on a formula that is already a MUS, it will perform n*(n-1) calls to SAT, where
// n is the number of clauses of the problem.
func (pb *Problem) MUSInsertion() (mus *Problem, err error) {
pb2, err := pb.UnsatSubset()
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not extract MUS: %v", err)
}
mus = &Problem{NbVars: pb2.NbVars}
clauses := pb2.Clauses
for {
if pb.Options.Verbose {
fmt.Printf("c mus currently contains %d clauses\n", mus.NbClauses)
}
s := solver.New(solver.ParseSliceNb(mus.Clauses, mus.NbVars))
s.Verbose = pb.Options.Verbose
st := s.Solve()
if st == solver.Unsat { // Found the MUS
return mus, nil
}
// Add clauses until the problem becomes UNSAT
idx := 0
for st == solver.Sat {
clause := clauses[idx]
lits := make([]solver.Lit, len(clause))
for i, lit := range clause {
lits[i] = solver.IntToLit(int32(lit))
}
cl := solver.NewClause(lits)
s.AppendClause(cl)
idx++
st = s.Solve()
}
idx-- // We went one step too far, go back
mus.Clauses = append(mus.Clauses, clauses[idx]) // Last clause is part of the MUS
mus.NbClauses++
if pb.Options.Verbose {
fmt.Printf("c removing %d/%d clause(s)\n", len(clauses)-idx, len(clauses))
}
clauses = clauses[:idx] // Remaining clauses are not part of the MUS
}
}
// MUSDeletion returns a Minimal Unsatisfiable Subset for the problem using the insertion method.
// A MUS is an unsatisfiable subset such that, if any of its clause is removed,
// the problem becomes satisfiable.
// A MUS can be useful to understand why a problem is UNSAT, but MUSes are expensive to compute since
// a SAT solver must be called several times on parts of the original problem to find them.
// The deletion algorithm is guaranteed to call exactly n SAT solvers, where n is the number of clauses in the problem.
// It can be quite efficient, but each time the solver is called, it is starting from scratch.
// Other methods keep the solver "hot", so despite requiring more calls, these methods can be more efficient in practice.
func (pb *Problem) MUSDeletion() (mus *Problem, err error) {
pb2, err := pb.UnsatSubset()
if err != nil {
if err == ErrNotUnsat {
return nil, err
}
return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not extract MUS: %v", err)
}
pb2.NbVars += pb2.NbClauses // Add one relax var for each clause
for i, clause := range pb2.Clauses { // Add relax lit to each clause
newClause := make([]int, len(clause)+1)
copy(newClause, clause)
newClause[len(clause)] = pb.NbVars + i + 1 // Add relax lit to the clause
pb2.Clauses[i] = newClause
}
s := solver.New(solver.ParseSlice(pb2.Clauses))
asumptions := make([]solver.Lit, pb2.NbClauses)
for i := 0; i < pb2.NbClauses; i++ {
asumptions[i] = solver.IntToLit(int32(-(pb.NbVars + i + 1))) // At first, all asumptions are false
}
for i := range pb2.Clauses {
// Relax current clause
asumptions[i] = asumptions[i].Negation()
s.Assume(asumptions)
if s.Solve() == solver.Sat {
// It is now sat; reinsert the clause, i.e re-falsify the relax lit
asumptions[i] = asumptions[i].Negation()
if pb.Options.Verbose {
fmt.Printf("c clause %d/%d: kept\n", i+1, pb2.NbClauses)
}
} else if pb.Options.Verbose {
fmt.Printf("c clause %d/%d: removed\n", i+1, pb2.NbClauses)
}
}
mus = &Problem{
NbVars: pb.NbVars,
}
for i, val := range asumptions {
if !val.IsPositive() {
// Lit is not relaxed, meaning the clause is part of the MUS
clause := pb2.Clauses[i]
clause = clause[:len(clause)-1] // Remove relax lit
mus.Clauses = append(mus.Clauses, clause)
}
mus.NbClauses = len(mus.Clauses)
}
return mus, nil
}
// MUS returns a Minimal Unsatisfiable Subset for the problem.
// A MUS is an unsatisfiable subset such that, if any of its clause is removed,
// the problem becomes satisfiable.
// A MUS can be useful to understand why a problem is UNSAT, but MUSes are expensive to compute since
// a SAT solver must be called several times on parts of the original problem to find them.
// The exact algorithm used to compute the MUS is not guaranteed. If you want to use a given algorithm,
// use the relevant functions.
func (pb *Problem) MUS() (mus *Problem, err error) {
return pb.MUSDeletion()
}