Add a comment for SOS_VM to indicate its VM ID for better understanding;
Tracked-On: #5077
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Previously the CPU affinity of SOS VM is initialized at runtime during
sanitize_vm_config() stage, follow the policy that all physical CPUs
except ocuppied by Pre-launched VMs are all belong to SOS_VM. Now change
the process that SOS CPU affinity should be initialized at build time
and has the assumption that its validity is guarenteed before runtime.
Tracked-On: #5077
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Chen CJ <jason.cj.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Add acrn-config tool formated nuc7i7dnb configurations code in misc/vm_configs/
folder with new layout;
Tracked-On: #5077
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
There are 3 kinds of configurations in ACRN hypervisor source code: hypervisor
overall setting, per-board setting and scenario specific per-VM setting.
Currently Kconfig act as hypervisor overall setting and its souce is located at
"hypervisor/arch/x86/configs/$(BOARD).config"; Per-board configs are located at
"hypervisor/arch/x86/configs/$(BOARD)" folder; scenario specific per-VM configs
are located at "hypervisor/scenarios/$(SCENARIO)" folder.
This layout brings issues that board configs and VM configs are coupled tightly.
The board specific Kconfig file and misc_cfg.h are shared by all scenarios, and
scenario specific pci_dev.c is shared by all boards. So the user have no way to
build hypervisor binary for different scenario on different board with one
source code repo.
The patch will setup a new VM configurations layout as below:
misc/vm_configs
├── boards --> folder of supported boards
│ ├── <board_1> --> scenario-irrelevant board configs
│ │ ├── board.c --> C file of board configs
│ │ ├── board_info.h --> H file of board info
│ │ ├── pci_devices.h --> pBDF of PCI devices
│ │ └── platform_acpi_info.h --> native ACPI info
│ ├── <board_2>
│ ├── <board_3>
│ └── <board...>
└── scenarios --> folder of supported scenarios
├── <scenario_1> --> scenario specific VM configs
│ ├── <board_1> --> board specific VM configs for <scenario_1>
│ │ ├── <board_1>.config --> Kconfig for specific scenario on specific board
│ │ ├── misc_cfg.h --> H file of board specific VM configs
│ │ ├── pci_dev.c --> board specific VM pci devices list
│ │ └── vbar_base.h --> vBAR base info of VM PT pci devices
│ ├── <board_2>
│ ├── <board_3>
│ ├── <board...>
│ ├── vm_configurations.c --> C file of scenario specific VM configs
│ └── vm_configurations.h --> H file of scenario specific VM configs
├── <scenario_2>
├── <scenario_3>
└── <scenario...>
The new layout would decouple board configs and VM configs completely:
The boards folder stores kinds of supported boards info, each board folder
stores scenario-irrelevant board configs only, which could be totally got from
a physical platform and works for all scenarios;
The scenarios folder stores VM configs of kinds of working scenario. In each
scenario folder, besides the generic scenario specific VM configs, the board
specific VM configs would be put in a embedded board folder.
In new layout, all configs files will be removed out of hypervisor folder and
moved to a separate folder. This would make hypervisor LoC calculation more
precisely with below fomula:
typical LoC = Loc(hypervisor) + Loc(one vm_configs)
which
Loc(one vm_configs) = Loc(misc/vm_configs/boards/<board>)
+ LoC(misc/vm_configs/scenarios/<scenario>/<board>)
+ Loc(misc/vm_configs/scenarios/<scenario>/vm_configurations.c
+ Loc(misc/vm_configs/scenarios/<scenario>/vm_configurations.h
Tracked-On: #5077
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Chen CJ <jason.cj.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
