Currently the vcpu_affinity[] array fixes the vCPU to pCPU mapping.
While the new cpu_affinity_bitmap doesn't explicitly sepcify this
mapping, instead, it implicitly assumes that vCPU0 maps to the pCPU
with lowest pCPU ID, vCPU1 maps to the second lowest pCPU ID, and
so on.
This makes it possible for post-launched VM to run vCPUs on a subset of
these pCPUs only, and not all of them.
acrn-dm may launch post-launched VMs with the current approach: indicate
VM UUID and hypervisor launches all VCPUs from the PCPUs that are masked
in cpu_affinity_bitmap.
Also acrn-dm can choose to launch the VM on a subset of PCPUs that is
defined in cpu_affinity_bitmap. In this way, acrn-dm must specify the
subset of PCPUs in the CREATE_VM hypercall.
Additionally, with this change, a guest's vcpu_num can be easily calculated
from cpu_affinity_bitmap, so don't assign vcpu_num in vm_configuration.c.
Tracked-On: #4616
Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
The parameter of "idle=halt" for SOS cmdline is only needed when cpu sharing
is enabled, otherwise it will impact SOS power.
Tracked-On: #4329
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
CONFIG_MAX_KATA_VM_NUM is a scenario specific configuration, so it is better
to put the MACRO in scenario folder directly, to instead the Kconfig item in
Kconfig file which should work for all scenarios;
Tracked-On: #4616
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Currently ept_pages_info[] is initialized with first element only that force
VM of id 0 using SOS EPT pages. This is incorrect for logical partition and
hybrid scenario. Considering SOS_RAM_SIZE and UOS_RAM_SIZE are configured
separately, we should use different ept pages accordingly.
So, the PRE_VM_NUM/SOS_VM_NUM and MAX_POST_VM_NUM macros are introduced to
resolve this issue. The macros would be generated by acrn-config tool when
user configure ACRN for their specific scenario.
One more thing, that when UOS_RAM_SIZE is less then 2GB, the EPT address
range should be (4G + PLATFORM_HI_MMIO_SIZE).
Tracked-On: #4458
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Change i915.domain_plane_owners and i915.avail_planes_per_pipe for
hybrid scenario;because some User vm(like:Ubuntu/Debian and WaaG)
doesn't support plane restriction; it will use PipeA by default.
Tracked-On: #3840
Signed-off-by: fuzhongl <fuzhong.liu@intel.com>
Add this vcpu_affinity[] for each VM to indicate the assignment policy.
With it, pcpu_bitmap is not needed, so remove it from vm_config.
Instead, vcpu_affinity is a must for each VM.
This patch also add some sanitize check of vcpu_affinity[]. Here are
some rules:
1) only one bit can be set for each vcpu_affinity of vcpu.
2) two vcpus in same VM cannot be set with same vcpu_affinity.
3) vcpu_affinity cannot be set to the pcpu which used by pre-launched VM.
v4: config SDC with CONFIG_MAX_KATA_VM_NUM
v5: config SDC with CONFIG_MAX_PCPU_NUM
Tracked-On: #3663
Signed-off-by: Jason Chen CJ <jason.cj.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Wang <yu1.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuo A Liu <shuo.a.liu@intel.com>
In current design, devicemodel passes VM UUID to create VMs and hypervisor
would check the UUID whether it is matched with the one in VM configurations.
Kata container would maintain few UUIDs to let ACRN launch the VM, so
hypervisor need to add these UUIDs in VM configurations for Kata running.
In the hypercall of hcall_get_platform_info(), hypervisor will report the
maximum Kata container number it will support. The patch will add a Kconfig
to indicate the maximum Kata container number that SOS could support.
In current stage, only one Kata container is supported by SOS on SDC scenario
so add one UUID for Kata container in SDC VM configuration. If we want to
support Kata on other scenarios in the future, we could follow the example
of this patch;
Tracked-On: #3402
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Hybrid scenario will run 3 VMs: one pre-launched VM, one pre-launched SOS VM
and one post-launched Standard VM.
Tracked-On: #3214
Signed-off-by: Victor Sun <victor.sun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Chen CJ <jason.cj.chen@intel.com>
