Trying to prevent duplicate action emails by adding an extra check on job status.
---------
Signed-off-by: NorthRealm <155140859+NorthRealm@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Christopher Homberger <christopher.homberger@web.de>
similar to how we can enable/disable repos or issues on a repo add the
code unit as option to it.
affects
```
PATCH /repos/{owner}/{repo}
```
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
The commit range in the UI follows a half-open, half-closed convention:
(,]. When reviewing a range of commits, the beforeCommitID should be set
to the commit immediately preceding the first selected commit. For
single-commit reviews, we must identify and use the previous commit of
that specific commit.
The endpoint ViewPullFilesStartingFromCommit is currently unused and can
be safely removed.
Fix#35157
Replace #35184
Partially extract from #35077
#35015
For easier review, the changes are split into separate commits by broad
category. The extended commit messages include brief summaries. I am
happy to make a separate pull request for each category if preferred.
While many of the changes are corrections, some are influenced by style.
In those cases I have aimed mainly for consistency throughout the file,
picking a style variant that I think is widely accepted and aids
clarity.
There are additional things that could be improved that I have not
touched. For example, contractions (phrasing variants such as "doesn't"
vs. "does not") could be made more consistent. Not sure how colloquial
or formal the maintainers would like the UI to be.
---------
Signed-off-by: Dominik Rubo <dr-1@posteo.net>
Co-authored-by: Dominik Rubo <dominik.rubo@posteo.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Fixes#21291, allowing icons and other missing attributes to appear for
NuGet packages from inside Visual Studio like they do with GitHub Nuget
packages.
Adds additional NuGet package information, particularly `IconURL`, to
bring the Gitea NuGet API more in-line with GitHub's NuGet API.
ref: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/api/search-query-service-resource
1. Make "Issuer" strictly follow the spec (see comment)
2. Make "/.well-known/openid-configuration" respond 404 if the OAuth2
provider is not enabled.
Then by the way, remove the JSEscape template helper because it is not
needed any more.
Symlinks are followed when you click on a link next to an entry, either
until a file has been found or until we know that the link is dead.
When the link cannot be accessed, we fall back to the current behavior
of showing the document containing the target.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Follow up the "editor" refactor, use the same approach to simplify code,
and fix some docs & comments
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
This PR fixes a state de-synchronization bug with the issue stopwatch,
it resolves the issue by replacing the ambiguous `/toggle` endpoint
with two explicit endpoints: `/start` and `/stop`.
- The "Start timer" button now exclusively calls the `/start` endpoint.
- The "Stop timer" button now exclusively calls the `/stop` endpoint.
This ensures the user's intent is clearly communicated to the server,
eliminating the state inconsistency and fixing the bug.
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
When viewing a file that the user can't edit because they can't write to
the branch, the new, upload, patch, edit and delete functionality is no
longer disabled.
If no user fork of the repository exists, there is now a page to create one.
It will automatically create a fork with a single branch matching the one
being viewed, and a unique repository name will be automatically picked.
When a fork exists, but it's archived, a mirror or the user can't write
code to it, there will instead be a message explaining the situation.
If the usable fork exists, a message will appear at the top of the edit page
explaining that the changes will be applied to a branch in the fork. The
base repository branch will be pushed to a new branch to the fork, and
then the edits will be applied on top.
The suggestion to fork happens when accessing /_edit/, so that for
example online documentation can have an "edit this page" link to
the base repository that does the right thing.
Also includes changes to properly report errors when trying to commit
to a new branch that is protected, and when trying to commit to an
existing branch when choosing the new branch option.
Resolves#9017, #20882
---------
Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
The merge-upstream route was so far performing any kind of merge, even
those that would create merge commits and thus make your branch diverge
from upstream, requiring manual intervention via the git cli to undo the
damage.
With the new optional parameter ff_only, we can instruct gitea to error
out, if a non-fast-forward merge would be performed.
By default, the code extracts 200 package versions. If too many packages
are generated every day or if rule cleaning is enabled later, which
means there are more than 200 versions corresponding to the library
package, it may not be cleaned up completely, resulting in residue
Fix#31961
---------
Co-authored-by: yeyuanjie <yecao100@126.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
1. Add some missing (optional) fields for nuget v2, and sort the fields
to make it easier to maintain
2. Add missing "platform" for rubygems: `VERSION-PLATFORM` and
`VERSION_PLATFORM`
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
