This PR adds double quotes to variables in the blogbench script to
have uniformity across all the tests.
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
This PR enables the blogbench performance test for the kata metrics CI.
Fixes#7281
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
This PR builds the foundation for us to start migrating the
cri-containerd tests from Jenkins to GitHub Actions.
Right now the test does nothing and should always finish successfully.
The coming PRs will actually introduce logic to the `gha-run.sh` script
where we'll be able to run the tests and make sure those pass before
having them actually merged.
Fixes: #6543
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Those functions were originally introduced as part of the
`metrics/gha-run.sh` file, but those will be very hand at the time we
start adding more tests.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
TDX tests need to be temporarily disabled as the current machine
allocated for this will be off for some time, and a new machine only
will be added next week.
Fixes: #7307
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This is a very simple addition, that should be expanded by
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/pull/7185, and it's
targetting gathering more info that will help us to debug CI failures.
Fixes: #7296
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This PR updates memory usage script by applying the clean_env_ctr at the main
in order to avoid failures of leaving certain processes not removed.
Fixes#7302
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
Let's make sure we cancel previous runs, mainly as we have some of those
that take a lot of time to run, whenever the PR is updated.
This is based on the following stack overflow suggestion:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66335225/how-to-cancel-previous-runs-in-the-pr-when-you-push-new-commitsupdate-the-curre
This is very much needed as we don't want to wait for a long time to
have access to a runner because of other runners are still being used
performing a task that's meaningless due to the PR update.
Fixes: #7298
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Currently a mixture of cbl-mariner and mariner is used when creating the
mariner initrd. The kata-static tarball has mariner in the name, but the
jenkins url uses cbl-mariner. This breaks cache usage.
Use mariner as the target name throughout the build, so that caching works.
Fixes: #7292
Signed-off-by: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@microsoft.com>
This is a very nice suggestion from Steve Horsman, as with that we can
manually trigger the workflow anytime we need to test it, instead of
waiting for a full day for it to be retriggered via the `schedule`
event.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Passing the commit hash as the "pr-number" has shown problematic as it
would make the AKS cluster name longer than what's accepted by AKS.
One easy way to solve this is just passing "nightly" as the PR number,
as that's only used to create the cluster.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This will help folks to monitor the history of the failing tests, as
we've done in Jenkins with the "Green Effort CI".
Fixes: #7279
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We should not go through the trouble of running all our tests on AKS /
Azure / baremetal machines in case a PR only changes our documentation.
Fixes: #7258
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We've noticed this caused regressions with the k8s-oom tests, and then
decided to take a step back and do this in the same way it was done
before 67972ec48a.
Moreover, this step back is also more reasonable in terms of the
controlling logic.
And by doing this we can re-enable the k8s-oom.bats tests, which is done
as part of this PR.
Fixes: #7271
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/tests#5705
Signed-off-by: Yushuo <y-shuo@linux.alibaba.com>
As we need to pass down the commit sha to the jobs that will be
triggered from the `push` event, we must be careful on what exactly
we're using there.
At first we were using ${{ github.ref }}, but this turns out to be the
**branch name**, rather than the commit hash. In order to actually get
the commit hash, Let's use ${{ github.sha }} instead.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
As we need to pass down the commit sha to the jobs that will be
triggered from the `schedule` event, we must be careful on what exactly
we're using there.
At first we were using ${{ github.ref }}, but this turns out to be the
**branch name**, rather than the commit hash. In order to actually get
the commit hash, Let's use ${{ github.sha }} instead, as described by
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's take the same approach of the go runtime, instead, and allocate
the maximum allowed number of vcpus instead.
Fixes: #7270
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's skip the k8s-oom, as the test is currently failing.
We've an issue opened for that, and we'll be working on re-enabling it
as soon as possible.
Reference:
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/7271Fixes: #7253
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's skip the k8s-number-cpus, as the test is currently failing.
We've an issue opened for that, and we'll be working on re-enabling it
as soon as possible.
Reference:
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/7270Fixes: #7253
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This reverts commit 25d2fb0fde.
The reason we're reverting the commit is because it to check whether
it's the cause for the regression on devmapper tests.
Fixes: #7253
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/tests#5705
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This PR will enable the memory inside container metrics for the Kata CI.
Fixes#7254
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
On cc3993d860 we introduced a regression,
where we started passing inputs.commit-hash, instead of
github.event.pull_request.head.sha. However, we have been setting
commit-hash to github.event.pull_request.sha, meaning that we're mssing
a `.head.` there.
github.event.pull_request.sha is empty for the pull_request_target
event, leading the CI to pull the content from `main` instead of the
content from the PR.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The latter workflow is breaking as it doesn't recognise ${GITHUB_REF},
the former would most likely break as well, but it didn't get triggered
yet.
The error we're facing is:
```
Determining the checkout info
/usr/bin/git branch --list --remote origin/${GITHUB_REF}
/usr/bin/git tag --list ${GITHUB_REF}
Error: A branch or tag with the name '${GITHUB_REF}' could not be found
```
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
