Now we're using a "confidential" image that has support for all of
those.
Fixes: #9010 -- part II
#8982 -- part II
#8978 -- part II
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Avoid error when building for amd64 using:
USE_CACHE=no AGENT_POLICY=yes DEBUG=1 \
tools/packaging/kata-deploy/local-build/kata-deploy-binaries.sh \
--build=rootfs-image
Fixes: #9067
Signed-off-by: Dan Mihai <dmihai@microsoft.com>
For Confidential containers stack, the pause image is managed by host side,
then it may configure a malicious pause image, we need package
a pause image inside the rootfs and don't the pause image from host.
But the installation of skopeo is not included in 20.04 release, so we
can not directly install skopeo in rootfs and pull pause image.
So I plan to let the task as a static build stuff, which would not be influenced
by the system version in rootfs. And the pause image will be part of the Kata Containers rootfs
that's used by the Confidential Containers usecase. This commit enables the component to be built
both locally and in our CI environment with the command: make pause-image-tarball.
Fixes: #9032
Signed-off-by: ChengyuZhu6 <chengyu.zhu@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Wang, Arron <arron.wang@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Jakob Naucke <jakob.naucke@ibm.com>
This PR removes the jenkins reference which is not longer being used
in the kernel documentation.
Fixes#9046
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
This is required as the tdx-attest-rs crate, which is used as part of
the guest components, has a runtime dependency on libattest-tdx.
Fixes: #9021 -- part II
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's install the coco-guest-components into the confidential rootfs
image and initrd.
Fixes: #9021
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This will make our lives easier to figure out whether the components are
being installed or not.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We need to pass this to the container where the rootfs is built, so it
can actually be unpacked inside the rootfs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
As DESTDIR was not being passed, we've been installing the final
binaries in a container path that was not exposed to the host, leading
to creating an empty tarball with the guest components.
Now, theoretically, guest-components should respect a PREFIX passed, but
that's not the case and we're manually adding "/usr/local/bin" to the
passed DESTDIR.
Here's the result of the tarball:
```bash
⋊> kata-containers ≡ tar tf build/kata-static-coco-guest-components.tar.xz
./
./usr/
./usr/local/
./usr/local/bin/
./usr/local/bin/confidential-data-hub
./usr/local/bin/attestation-agent
./usr/local/bin/api-server-rest
```
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's use a single rootfs image / initrd for confidential workloads,
instead of having those split for different TEEs.
We can easily do this now as the soon-to-be-added guest-components can
be built in a generic way.
Fixes: #8982
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Now that we're using the kernel-confidential, let the rootfs depending
on it, instead of depending on the TEE specific ones.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We need to do this in order to ensure that the measure boot will be
taking the latest kernel bits, as needed.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This is already done for the TDX kernel, and should have been done also
for the confidential one.
This action requires us to bump the kernel version as the resulting
kernel will be different from the cached one.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
I made this a required argument during the series and ended up
forgetting to add that while calling the function.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This issues was introduced due to a typo not caught during reviews on
e5bca90274.
Fixes: #6415 -- part II
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Till now we didn't have a logic to consume the kernel modules cached
tarball. Let's make sure those are consumed as it'll save us a
reasonable amount of build time.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This will save us a lot of time, as right now the CI is rebuilding the
kernel for absolutely no reason.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's start doing this for the confidential kernels (and also for SEV,
till it gets removed).
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This allows us to add a map, in the format of:
`"tarball1_name:tarball1_path tarball2_name:tarball2_path ..."`
With this we have a base to start doing a better job when caching extra
artefacts, like kernel modules.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Right now this is just being added but not used yet. The idea is to use
this to both cache and later on untar the kernel modules needed for some
of the kernel targets we have (specifically looking at the confidential
one).
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The necessary files for the agent builder image can be found in
`tools/packaging/static-build/agent`,
`ci/install_libseccomp.sh` and
`tools/packaging/kata-deploy/local-build/kata-deploy-copy-libseccomp-installer.sh`.
Identifying the correct files addresses the previously misreferenced path
used to name the builder image.
Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
By running `kustomize edit fix` on those files they have changed
deprecated instructions ('bases' and 'patchesStrategicMerge') as well as
'apiVersion' and 'kind' were added.
Fixes#8268
Signed-off-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
Move the f15be37d9bef58a0128bcba006f8abb3ea13e8da version of scripts
required for openshift-ci from "kata-containers/tests/.ci/openshift-ci"
into "kata-containers/kata-containers/ci/openshift-ci" and required
webhook+libs into "kata-containers/kata-containers/tools/testing" as is
to simplify verification, the different location handling will be added
in following commit.
Signed-off-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
This involves using Ubuntu 20.04 as a build environment for an agent to match with a runtime environment.
Fixes: #8955
Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
We need to actually check that the env var is not empty. :-)
This was introduced by 8307718842.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The Confidential Containers guest-components will, in the very short
future, be part of the Kata Containers rootfs that's used by the
Confidential Containers usecase.
This commit introduces the ability to, standalone, build the component
locally and as part of our CI, and this can be done by calling:
`make coco-guest-components-tarball`
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linda Yu <linda.yu@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Jakob Naucke <jakob.naucke@ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Wang, Arron <arron.wang@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: zhouliang121 <liang.a.zhou@linux.alibaba.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Carter <alex.carter@ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Suraj Deshmukh <suraj.deshmukh@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Xynnn007 <xynnn@linux.alibaba.com>
Let's start relying on the already cached agent to be deployed inside
the rootfs. By doing this we save a lot of time in our CI, and we have
a better way, for developers, to play with changes in the agent.
Fixes: #8915
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
