Let's make sure we cancel previous runs, mainly as we have some of those
that take a lot of time to run, whenever the PR is updated.
This is based on the following stack overflow suggestion:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66335225/how-to-cancel-previous-runs-in-the-pr-when-you-push-new-commitsupdate-the-curre
This is very much needed as we don't want to wait for a long time to
have access to a runner because of other runners are still being used
performing a task that's meaningless due to the PR update.
Fixes: #7298
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We should not go through the trouble of running all our tests on AKS /
Azure / baremetal machines in case a PR only changes our documentation.
Fixes: #7258
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We've noticed this caused regressions with the k8s-oom tests, and then
decided to take a step back and do this in the same way it was done
before 67972ec48a.
Moreover, this step back is also more reasonable in terms of the
controlling logic.
And by doing this we can re-enable the k8s-oom.bats tests, which is done
as part of this PR.
Fixes: #7271
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/tests#5705
Signed-off-by: Yushuo <y-shuo@linux.alibaba.com>
As we need to pass down the commit sha to the jobs that will be
triggered from the `push` event, we must be careful on what exactly
we're using there.
At first we were using ${{ github.ref }}, but this turns out to be the
**branch name**, rather than the commit hash. In order to actually get
the commit hash, Let's use ${{ github.sha }} instead.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
As we need to pass down the commit sha to the jobs that will be
triggered from the `schedule` event, we must be careful on what exactly
we're using there.
At first we were using ${{ github.ref }}, but this turns out to be the
**branch name**, rather than the commit hash. In order to actually get
the commit hash, Let's use ${{ github.sha }} instead, as described by
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's take the same approach of the go runtime, instead, and allocate
the maximum allowed number of vcpus instead.
Fixes: #7270
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's skip the k8s-oom, as the test is currently failing.
We've an issue opened for that, and we'll be working on re-enabling it
as soon as possible.
Reference:
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/7271Fixes: #7253
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's skip the k8s-number-cpus, as the test is currently failing.
We've an issue opened for that, and we'll be working on re-enabling it
as soon as possible.
Reference:
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/7270Fixes: #7253
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This reverts commit 25d2fb0fde.
The reason we're reverting the commit is because it to check whether
it's the cause for the regression on devmapper tests.
Fixes: #7253
Depends-on: github.com/kata-containers/tests#5705
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
On cc3993d860 we introduced a regression,
where we started passing inputs.commit-hash, instead of
github.event.pull_request.head.sha. However, we have been setting
commit-hash to github.event.pull_request.sha, meaning that we're mssing
a `.head.` there.
github.event.pull_request.sha is empty for the pull_request_target
event, leading the CI to pull the content from `main` instead of the
content from the PR.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The latter workflow is breaking as it doesn't recognise ${GITHUB_REF},
the former would most likely break as well, but it didn't get triggered
yet.
The error we're facing is:
```
Determining the checkout info
/usr/bin/git branch --list --remote origin/${GITHUB_REF}
/usr/bin/git tag --list ${GITHUB_REF}
Error: A branch or tag with the name '${GITHUB_REF}' could not be found
```
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We have to do this, otherwise we cannot log into azure.
This is a regression introduced by
106e305717.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Instead of passing "-${{ inputs.tag }}-amd64", we must only pass
"-${{ inputs.tag }}".
This is a regression introduced by
106e305717.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
de83cd9de7 tried to solve an issue, but it
clearly seems that I'm using env wrongly, as what ended up being passed
as input was "$VAR", instead of the content of the VAR variable.
As we can simply avoid using those here, let's do it and save us a
headache.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
It has to have steps declared, and we need to make it a dependency for
the nightly kata-containers-ci-on-push job.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Otherwise we'll get the following error from the workflow:
```
The workflow is not valid. .github/workflows/ci-on-push.yaml (Line: 24,
Col: 20): Unrecognized named-value: 'env'. Located at position 1 within
expression: env.COMMIT_HASH .github/workflows/ci-on-push.yaml (Line: 25,
Col: 18): Unrecognized named-value: 'env'. Located at position 1 within
expression: env.PR_NUMBER
```
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This PR fixes the call to check_metrics function as KATA_HYPERVISOR
is not needed to be passed.
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
The idea is to mimic what's been done with Jenkins and the "Green CI"
effort, but now using our GHA and the GHA infrastructure.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's make sure we run our tests in a specific namespace, as in case of
any kind of issue, we will just get rid of the namespace itself, which
will take care of cleaning up any leftover from failing tests.
One important thing to mention is why we can get rid of the `namespace:
${namespace}` on the tests that are already using it, and let's do it in
parts:
* namespace: default
We can easily get rid of this as that's the default namespace where
pods are created, so it was a no-op so far.
* namespace: test-quota-ns
My understanding is that we'd need this in order to get a clean
namespace where we'd be setting a quota for. Doing this in the
namespace that's only used for tests should **not** cause any
side-effect on the tests, as we're running those in serial and there's
no other pods running on the `kata-containers-k8s-tests` namespace
Last but not least, we're not dynamically creating namespaces as the
tests are not running in parallel, **never**, not in the case of having
2 tests being ran at same time, neither in the case of having 2 jobs
being scheduled to the same machine.
Fixes: #6864
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This is based on the `ci-on-push.yaml` file, and it's called from ther
The reason to split on a new file is that we can easily introduce a
`ci-nightly.yaml` file and re-use the `ci.yaml` file there as well.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's ensure we're not relying, on any of the called workflows, on event
specific information.
Right now, the two information we've been relying on are:
* PR number, coming from github.event.pull_request.number
* Commit hash, coming from github.event.pull_request.head.sha
As we want to, in the future, add nightly jobs, which will be triggered
by a different event (thus, having different fields populated), we
should ensure that those are not used unless it's in the "top action"
that's trigerred by the event.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Use the 'function' keyword to prevent bash aliases from colliding
with other function's name.
Signed-off-by: David Esparza <david.esparza.borquez@intel.com>
This PR enables storing metrics workflow artifacts in two
separated flavours: clh and qemu.
Fixes: #7239
Signed-off-by: David Esparza <david.esparza.borquez@intel.com>
This PR adds the function name before the function to have uniformity
across all the test.
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
This PR adds blogbench and webtooling metrics checks to this repo.
The function running the test intentionally returns zero, so
the test will be enabled in another PR once the workflow is
green.
Fixes: #7069
Signed-off-by: David Esparza <david.esparza.borquez@intel.com>
