mirror of
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers.git
synced 2025-05-09 08:57:25 +00:00
4f0726bc49
Removed all TOCs now that GitHub auto-generates them. Also updated the documentation requirements doc removing the requirement to add a TOC. Fixes: #2022. Signed-off-by: James O. D. Hunt <james.o.hunt@intel.com>
63 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
# Hypervisors
|
|
|
|
## Introduction
|
|
|
|
Kata Containers supports multiple hypervisors. This document provides a very
|
|
high level overview of the available hypervisors, giving suggestions as to
|
|
which hypervisors you may wish to investigate further.
|
|
|
|
> **Note:**
|
|
>
|
|
> This document is not prescriptive or authoritative:
|
|
>
|
|
> - It is up to you to decide which hypervisors may be most appropriate for
|
|
> your use-case.
|
|
> - Refer to the official documentation for each hypervisor for further details.
|
|
|
|
## Types
|
|
|
|
Since each hypervisor offers different features and options, Kata Containers
|
|
provides a separate
|
|
[configuration file](/src/runtime/README.md#configuration)
|
|
for each. The configuration files contain comments explaining which options
|
|
are available, their default values and how each setting can be used.
|
|
|
|
> **Note:**
|
|
>
|
|
> The simplest way to switch between hypervisors is to create a symbolic link
|
|
> to the appropriate hypervisor-specific configuration file.
|
|
|
|
| Hypervisor | Written in | Architectures | Type | Configuration file |
|
|
|-|-|-|-|-|
|
|
[ACRN] | C | `x86_64` | Type 1 (bare metal) | `configuration-acrn.toml` |
|
|
[Cloud Hypervisor] | rust | `aarch64`, `x86_64` | Type 2 ([KVM]) | `configuration-clh.toml` |
|
|
[Firecracker] | rust | `aarch64`, `x86_64` | Type 2 ([KVM]) | `configuration-fc.toml` |
|
|
[QEMU] | C | all | Type 2 ([KVM]) | `configuration-qemu.toml` |
|
|
|
|
## Determine currently configured hypervisor
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
$ kata-runtime kata-env | awk -v RS= '/\[Hypervisor\]/' | grep Path
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Choose a Hypervisor
|
|
|
|
The table below provides a brief summary of some of the differences between
|
|
the hypervisors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hypervisor | Summary | Features | Limitations | Container Creation speed | Memory density | Use cases | Comment |
|
|
|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|
|
|
[ACRN] | Safety critical and real-time workloads | | | excellent | excellent | Embedded and IOT systems | For advanced users |
|
|
[Cloud Hypervisor] | Low latency, small memory footprint, small attack surface | Minimal | | excellent | excellent | High performance modern cloud workloads | |
|
|
[Firecracker] | Very slimline | Extremely minimal | Doesn't support all device types | excellent | excellent | Serverless / FaaS | |
|
|
[QEMU] | Lots of features | Lots | | good | good | Good option for most users | | All users |
|
|
|
|
For further details, see the [Virtualization in Kata Containers](design/virtualization.md) document and the official documentation for each hypervisor.
|
|
|
|
[ACRN]: https://projectacrn.org
|
|
[Cloud Hypervisor]: https://github.com/cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor
|
|
[Firecracker]: https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker
|
|
[KVM]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel-based_Virtual_Machine
|
|
[QEMU]: http://www.qemu-project.org
|