kata-containers/docs/Limitations.md
Yushuo ae2cfa8263 doc: add vcpu handlint doc for runtime-rs
Kubernetes and Containerd will help calculate the Sandbox Size and pass it to
Kata Containers through annotations.

In order to accommodate this favorable change and be compatible with the past,
we have implemented the handling of the number of vCPUs in runtime-rs. This is
This is slightly different from the original runtime-go design.

This doc introduce how we handle vCPU size in runtime-rs.

Fixes: #5030

Signed-off-by: Yushuo <y-shuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Ji-Xinyou <jerryji0414@outlook.com>
2023-06-12 19:23:11 +08:00

212 lines
8.8 KiB
Markdown

# Overview
A [Kata Container](https://github.com/kata-containers) utilizes a Virtual Machine (VM) to enhance security and
isolation of container workloads. As a result, the system has a number of differences
and limitations when compared with the default [Docker*](https://www.docker.com/) runtime,
[`runc`](https://github.com/opencontainers/runc).
Some of these limitations have potential solutions, whereas others exist
due to fundamental architectural differences generally related to the
use of VMs.
The [Kata Container runtime](../src/runtime)
launches each container within its own hardware isolated VM, and each VM has
its own kernel. Due to this higher degree of isolation, certain container
capabilities cannot be supported or are implicitly enabled through the VM.
# Definition of a limitation
The [Open Container Initiative](https://www.opencontainers.org/)
[Runtime Specification](https://github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec) ("OCI spec")
defines the minimum specifications a runtime must support to interoperate with
container managers such as Docker. If a runtime does not support some aspect
of the OCI spec, it is by definition a limitation.
However, the OCI runtime reference implementation (`runc`) does not perfectly
align with the OCI spec itself.
Further, since the default OCI runtime used by Docker is `runc`, Docker
expects runtimes to behave as `runc` does. This implies that another form of
limitation arises if the behavior of a runtime implementation does not align
with that of `runc`. Having two standards complicates the challenge of
supporting a Docker environment since a runtime must support the official OCI
spec and the non-standard extensions provided by `runc`.
# Scope
Each known limitation is captured in a separate GitHub issue that contains
detailed information about the issue. These issues are tagged with the
`limitation` label. This document is a curated summary of important known
limitations and provides links to the relevant GitHub issues.
The following link shows the latest list of limitations:
- https://github.com/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+label%3Alimitation+org%3Akata-containers
# Contributing
If you would like to work on resolving a limitation, please refer to the
[contributors guide](https://github.com/kata-containers/community/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).
If you wish to raise an issue for a new limitation, either
[raise an issue directly on the runtime](https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/new)
or see the
[project table of contents](https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers)
for advice on which repository to raise the issue against.
# Pending items
This section lists items that might be possible to fix.
## OCI CLI commands
### Docker and Podman support
Currently Kata Containers does not support Podman.
See issue https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/722 for more information.
Docker supports Kata Containers since 22.06:
```bash
$ sudo docker run --runtime io.containerd.kata.v2
```
Kata Containers works perfectly with containerd, we recommend to use
containerd's Docker-style command line tool [`nerdctl`](https://github.com/containerd/nerdctl).
## Runtime commands
### checkpoint and restore
The runtime does not provide `checkpoint` and `restore` commands. There
are discussions about using VM save and restore to give us a
[`criu`](https://github.com/checkpoint-restore/criu)-like functionality,
which might provide a solution.
Note that the OCI standard does not specify `checkpoint` and `restore`
commands.
See issue https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/issues/184 for more information.
### events command
The runtime does not fully implement the `events` command. `OOM` notifications and `Intel RDT` stats are not fully supported.
Note that the OCI standard does not specify an `events` command.
See issue https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/issues/308 and https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/issues/309 for more information.
### update command
Currently, only block I/O weight is not supported.
All other configurations are supported and are working properly.
## Networking
### Host network
Host network (`nerdctl/docker run --net=host`or [Kubernetes `HostNetwork`](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/kubernetes-api/workload-resources/pod-v1/#hosts-namespaces)) is not supported.
It is not possible to directly access the host networking configuration
from within the VM.
The `--net=host` option can still be used with `runc` containers and
inter-mixed with running Kata Containers, thus enabling use of `--net=host`
when necessary.
It should be noted, currently passing the `--net=host` option into a
Kata Container may result in the Kata Container networking setup
modifying, re-configuring and therefore possibly breaking the host
networking setup. Do not use `--net=host` with Kata Containers.
### Support for joining an existing VM network
Docker supports the ability for containers to join another containers
namespace with the `docker run --net=containers` syntax. This allows
multiple containers to share a common network namespace and the network
interfaces placed in the network namespace. Kata Containers does not
support network namespace sharing. If a Kata Container is setup to
share the network namespace of a `runc` container, the runtime
effectively takes over all the network interfaces assigned to the
namespace and binds them to the VM. Consequently, the `runc` container loses
its network connectivity.
### docker run --link
The runtime does not support the `docker run --link` command. This
command is now deprecated by docker and we have no intention of adding support.
Equivalent functionality can be achieved with the newer docker networking commands.
See more documentation at
[docs.docker.com](https://docs.docker.com/network/links/).
## Resource management
Due to the way VMs differ in their CPU and memory allocation, and sharing
across the host system, the implementation of an equivalent method for
these commands is potentially challenging.
See issue https://github.com/clearcontainers/runtime/issues/341 and [the constraints challenge](#the-constraints-challenge) for more information.
For CPUs resource management see
[CPU constraints(in runtime-go)](design/vcpu-handling-runtime-go.md).
[CPU constraints(in runtime-rs)](design/vcpu-handling-runtime-rs.md).
# Architectural limitations
This section lists items that might not be fixed due to fundamental
architectural differences between "soft containers" (i.e. traditional Linux*
containers) and those based on VMs.
## Storage limitations
### Kubernetes `volumeMounts.subPaths`
Kubernetes `volumeMount.subPath` is not supported by Kata Containers at the
moment.
See [this issue](https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/issues/2812) for more details.
[Another issue](https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/1728) focuses on the case of `emptyDir`.
## Host resource sharing
### Privileged containers
Privileged support in Kata is essentially different from `runc` containers.
The container runs with elevated capabilities within the guest and is granted
access to guest devices instead of the host devices.
This is also true with using `securityContext privileged=true` with Kubernetes.
The container may also be granted full access to a subset of host devices
(https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/issues/1568).
See [Privileged Kata Containers](how-to/privileged.md) for how to configure some of this behavior.
# Appendices
## The constraints challenge
Applying resource constraints such as cgroup, CPU, memory, and storage to a workload is not always straightforward with a VM based system. A Kata Container runs in an isolated environment inside a virtual machine. This, coupled with the architecture of Kata Containers, offers many more possibilities than are available to traditional Linux containers due to the various layers and contexts.
In some cases it might be necessary to apply the constraints to multiple levels. In other cases, the hardware isolated VM provides equivalent functionality to the the requested constraint.
The following examples outline some of the various areas constraints can be applied:
- Inside the VM
Constrain the guest kernel. This can be achieved by passing particular values through the kernel command line used to boot the guest kernel. Alternatively, sysctl values can be applied at early boot.
- Inside the container
Constrain the container created inside the VM.
- Outside the VM:
- Constrain the hypervisor process by applying host-level constraints.
- Constrain all processes running inside the hypervisor.
This can be achieved by specifying particular hypervisor configuration options.
Note that in some circumstances it might be necessary to apply particular constraints
to more than one of the previous areas to achieve the desired level of isolation and resource control.