mirror of
https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git
synced 2025-07-29 06:27:05 +00:00
Fix kubelet AppArmor rejection test
The corresponding e2e test needs to be adjusted side by side to the merged PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/125776. Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
11c689b945
commit
2df920120a
@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ var _ = SIGDescribe("AppArmor", feature.AppArmor, nodefeature.AppArmor, func() {
|
||||
|
||||
ginkgo.It("should reject a pod with an AppArmor profile", func(ctx context.Context) {
|
||||
status := runAppArmorTest(ctx, f, false, v1.DeprecatedAppArmorBetaProfileRuntimeDefault)
|
||||
expectSoftRejection(status)
|
||||
expectRejection(status)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -229,12 +229,11 @@ func createPodWithAppArmor(ctx context.Context, f *framework.Framework, profile
|
||||
return e2epod.NewPodClient(f).Create(ctx, pod)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func expectSoftRejection(status v1.PodStatus) {
|
||||
func expectRejection(status v1.PodStatus) {
|
||||
args := []interface{}{"PodStatus: %+v", status}
|
||||
gomega.Expect(status.Phase).To(gomega.Equal(v1.PodPending), args...)
|
||||
gomega.Expect(status.Phase).To(gomega.Equal(v1.PodFailed), args...)
|
||||
gomega.Expect(status.Reason).To(gomega.Equal("AppArmor"), args...)
|
||||
gomega.Expect(status.Message).To(gomega.ContainSubstring("AppArmor"), args...)
|
||||
gomega.Expect(status.ContainerStatuses[0].State.Waiting.Reason).To(gomega.Equal("Blocked"), args...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func isAppArmorEnabled() bool {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user