mirror of
https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git
synced 2025-07-24 12:15:52 +00:00
Rescheduling for critical pods proposal
This commit is contained in:
parent
42392fea3c
commit
4346e7b312
117
docs/proposals/rescheduling-for-critical-pods.md
Normal file
117
docs/proposals/rescheduling-for-critical-pods.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
|
||||
<!-- BEGIN MUNGE: UNVERSIONED_WARNING -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- BEGIN STRIP_FOR_RELEASE -->
|
||||
|
||||
<img src="http://kubernetes.io/kubernetes/img/warning.png" alt="WARNING"
|
||||
width="25" height="25">
|
||||
<img src="http://kubernetes.io/kubernetes/img/warning.png" alt="WARNING"
|
||||
width="25" height="25">
|
||||
<img src="http://kubernetes.io/kubernetes/img/warning.png" alt="WARNING"
|
||||
width="25" height="25">
|
||||
<img src="http://kubernetes.io/kubernetes/img/warning.png" alt="WARNING"
|
||||
width="25" height="25">
|
||||
<img src="http://kubernetes.io/kubernetes/img/warning.png" alt="WARNING"
|
||||
width="25" height="25">
|
||||
|
||||
<h2>PLEASE NOTE: This document applies to the HEAD of the source tree</h2>
|
||||
|
||||
If you are using a released version of Kubernetes, you should
|
||||
refer to the docs that go with that version.
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation for other releases can be found at
|
||||
[releases.k8s.io](http://releases.k8s.io).
|
||||
</strong>
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- END STRIP_FOR_RELEASE -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- END MUNGE: UNVERSIONED_WARNING -->
|
||||
|
||||
# Rescheduler: guaranteed scheduling of critical addons
|
||||
|
||||
## Motivation
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to Kubernetes core components like api-server, scheduler, controller-manager running on a master machine
|
||||
there is a bunch of addons which due to various reasons have to run on a regular cluster node, not the master.
|
||||
Some of them are critical to have fully functional cluster: Heapster, DNS, UI. Users can break their cluster
|
||||
by evicting a critical addon (either manually or as a side effect of an other operation like upgrade)
|
||||
which possibly can become pending (for example when the cluster is highly utilized).
|
||||
To avoid such situation we want to have a mechanism which guarantees that
|
||||
critical addons are scheduled assuming the cluster is big enough.
|
||||
This possibly may affect other pods (including production user’s applications).
|
||||
|
||||
## Design
|
||||
|
||||
Rescheduler will ensure that critical addons are always scheduled.
|
||||
In the first version it will implement only this policy, but later we may want to introduce other policies.
|
||||
It will be a standalone component running on master machine similarly to scheduler.
|
||||
Those components will share common logic (initially rescheduler will in fact import some of scheduler packages).
|
||||
|
||||
### Guaranteed scheduling of critical addons
|
||||
|
||||
Rescheduler will observe critical addons
|
||||
(with annotation `scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/critical-pod`).
|
||||
If one of them is marked by scheduler as unschedulable (pod condition `PodScheduled` set to `false`, the reason set to `Unschedulable`)
|
||||
the component will try to find a space for the addon by evicting some pods and then the scheduler will schedule the addon.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scoring nodes
|
||||
|
||||
Initially we want to choose a random node with enough capacity
|
||||
(chosen as described in [Evicting pods](rescheduling-for-critical-pods.md#evicting-pods)) to schedule given addons.
|
||||
Later we may want to introduce some heuristic:
|
||||
* minimize number of evicted pods with violation of disruption budget or shortened termination grace period
|
||||
* minimize number of affected pods by choosing a node on which we have to evict less pods
|
||||
* increase probability of scheduling of evicted pods by preferring a set of pods with the smallest total sum of requests
|
||||
* avoid nodes which are ‘non-drainable’ (according to drain logic), for example on which there is a pod which doesn’t belong to any RC/RS/Deployment
|
||||
|
||||
#### Evicting pods
|
||||
|
||||
There are 2 mechanism which possibly can delay a pod eviction: Disruption Budget and Termination Grace Period.
|
||||
|
||||
While removing a pod we will try to avoid violating Disruption Budget, though we can’t guarantee it
|
||||
since there is a chance that it would block this operation for longer period of time.
|
||||
We will also try to respect Termination Grace Period, though without any guarantee.
|
||||
In case we have to remove a pod with termination grace period longer than 10s it will be shortened to 10s.
|
||||
|
||||
The proposed order while choosing a node to schedule a critical addon and pods to remove:
|
||||
1. a node where the critical addon pod can fit after evicting only pods satisfying both
|
||||
(1) their disruption budget will not be violated by such eviction and (2) they have grace period <= 10 seconds
|
||||
1. a node where the critical addon pod can fit after evicting only pods whose disruption budget will not be violated by such eviction
|
||||
1. any node where the critical addon pod can fit after evicting some pods
|
||||
|
||||
### Interaction with Scheduler
|
||||
|
||||
To avoid situation when Scheduler will schedule another pod into the space prepared for the critical addon,
|
||||
the chosen node has to be temporarily excluded from a list of nodes considered by Scheduler while making decisions.
|
||||
For this purpose the node will get a temporary
|
||||
[Taint](../../docs/design/taint-toleration-dedicated.md) “CriticalAddonsOnly”
|
||||
and each critical addon has to have defined toleration for this taint.
|
||||
After Rescheduler has no more work to do: all critical addons are scheduled or cluster is too small for them,
|
||||
all taints will be removed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Interaction with Cluster Autoscaler
|
||||
|
||||
Rescheduler possibly can duplicate the responsibility of Cluster Autoscaler:
|
||||
both components are taking action when there is unschedulable pod.
|
||||
It may cause the situation when CA will add extra node for a pending critical addon
|
||||
and Rescheduler will evict some running pods to make a space for the addon.
|
||||
This situation would be rare and usually an extra node would be anyway needed for evicted pods.
|
||||
In the worst case CA will add and then remove the node.
|
||||
To not complicate architecture by introducing interaction between those 2 components we accept this overlap.
|
||||
|
||||
We want to ensure that CA won’t remove nodes with critical addons by adding appropriate logic there.
|
||||
|
||||
### Rescheduler control loop
|
||||
|
||||
The rescheduler control loop will be as follow:
|
||||
* while there is an unschedulable critical addon do the following:
|
||||
* choose a node on which the addon should be scheduled (as described in Evicting pods)
|
||||
* add taint to the node to prevent scheduler from using it
|
||||
* delete pods which blocks the addon from being scheduled
|
||||
* wait until scheduler will schedule the critical addon
|
||||
* if there is no more critical addons for which we can help, ensure there is no node with the taint
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- BEGIN MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->
|
||||
[]()
|
||||
<!-- END MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user