mirror of
https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git
synced 2025-07-30 15:05:27 +00:00
Add note about space-shuttle code style in controller/volume
This commit is contained in:
parent
8a1baa4d64
commit
de4d193d45
@ -33,21 +33,56 @@ import (
|
||||
"github.com/golang/glog"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// ==================================================================
|
||||
// PLEASE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO SIMPLIFY THIS CODE.
|
||||
// KEEP THE SPACE SHUTTLE FLYING.
|
||||
// ==================================================================
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This controller is intentionally written in a very verbose style. You will
|
||||
// notice:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 1. Every 'if' statement has a matching 'else' (exception: simple error
|
||||
// checks for a client API call)
|
||||
// 2. Things that may seem obvious are commented explicitly
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We call this style 'space shuttle style'. Space shuttle style is meant to
|
||||
// ensure that every branch and condition is considered and accounted for -
|
||||
// the same way code is written at NASA for applications like the space
|
||||
// shuttle.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Originally, the work of this controller was split amongst three
|
||||
// controllers. This controller is the result a large effort to simplify the
|
||||
// PV subsystem. During that effort, it became clear that we needed to ensure
|
||||
// that every single condition was handled and accounted for in the code, even
|
||||
// if it resulted in no-op code branches.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// As a result, the controller code may seem overly verbose, commented, and
|
||||
// 'branchy'. However, a large amount of business knowledge and context is
|
||||
// recorded here in order to ensure that future maintainers can correctly
|
||||
// reason through the complexities of the binding behavior. For that reason,
|
||||
// changes to this file should preserve and add to the space shuttle style.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ==================================================================
|
||||
// PLEASE DO NOT ATTEMPT TO SIMPLIFY THIS CODE.
|
||||
// KEEP THE SPACE SHUTTLE FLYING.
|
||||
// ==================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
// Design:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The fundamental key to this design is the bi-directional "pointer" between
|
||||
// PersistentVolumes (PVs) and PersistentVolumeClaims (PVCs), which is
|
||||
// represented here as pvc.Spec.VolumeName and pv.Spec.ClaimRef. The bi-directionality
|
||||
// is complicated to manage in a transactionless system, but without it we
|
||||
// can't ensure sane behavior in the face of different forms of trouble. For
|
||||
// example, a rogue HA controller instance could end up racing and making
|
||||
// multiple bindings that are indistinguishable, resulting in potential data
|
||||
// loss.
|
||||
// represented here as pvc.Spec.VolumeName and pv.Spec.ClaimRef. The bi-
|
||||
// directionality is complicated to manage in a transactionless system, but
|
||||
// without it we can't ensure sane behavior in the face of different forms of
|
||||
// trouble. For example, a rogue HA controller instance could end up racing
|
||||
// and making multiple bindings that are indistinguishable, resulting in
|
||||
// potential data loss.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This controller is designed to work in active-passive high availability mode.
|
||||
// It *could* work also in active-active HA mode, all the object transitions are
|
||||
// designed to cope with this, however performance could be lower as these two
|
||||
// active controllers will step on each other toes frequently.
|
||||
// This controller is designed to work in active-passive high availability
|
||||
// mode. It *could* work also in active-active HA mode, all the object
|
||||
// transitions are designed to cope with this, however performance could be
|
||||
// lower as these two active controllers will step on each other toes
|
||||
// frequently.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This controller supports pre-bound (by the creator) objects in both
|
||||
// directions: a PVC that wants a specific PV or a PV that is reserved for a
|
||||
@ -55,10 +90,10 @@ import (
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The binding is two-step process. PV.Spec.ClaimRef is modified first and
|
||||
// PVC.Spec.VolumeName second. At any point of this transaction, the PV or PVC
|
||||
// can be modified by user or other controller or completelly deleted. Also, two
|
||||
// (or more) controllers may try to bind different volumes to different claims
|
||||
// at the same time. The controller must recover from any conflicts that may
|
||||
// arise from these conditions.
|
||||
// can be modified by user or other controller or completelly deleted. Also,
|
||||
// two (or more) controllers may try to bind different volumes to different
|
||||
// claims at the same time. The controller must recover from any conflicts
|
||||
// that may arise from these conditions.
|
||||
|
||||
// annBindCompleted annotation applies to PVCs. It indicates that the lifecycle
|
||||
// of the PVC has passed through the initial setup. This information changes how
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user