mirror of
https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git
synced 2025-08-10 12:32:03 +00:00
dra resourceclaim controller: remove reservation for completed pods
When a pod is known to never run (again), the reservation for it also can be removed. This is relevant in particular for the job controller.
This commit is contained in:
parent
7f5a02fc7e
commit
e8a0c42212
@ -435,10 +435,10 @@ func (ec *Controller) syncClaim(ctx context.Context, namespace, name string) err
|
||||
keepEntry = false
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
pod, err := ec.podLister.Pods(claim.Namespace).Get(reservedFor.Name)
|
||||
if err != nil && !errors.IsNotFound(err) {
|
||||
switch {
|
||||
case err != nil && !errors.IsNotFound(err):
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
if pod == nil {
|
||||
case err != nil:
|
||||
// We might not have it in our informer cache
|
||||
// yet. Removing the pod while the scheduler is
|
||||
// scheduling it would be bad. We have to be
|
||||
@ -449,10 +449,14 @@ func (ec *Controller) syncClaim(ctx context.Context, namespace, name string) err
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
if pod == nil || pod.UID != reservedFor.UID {
|
||||
logger.V(6).Info("remove reservation because pod is gone or got replaced", "pod", klog.KObj(pod), "claim", klog.KRef(namespace, name))
|
||||
keepEntry = false
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if pod.UID != reservedFor.UID {
|
||||
// Pod exists, but is a different incarnation under the same name.
|
||||
case pod.UID != reservedFor.UID:
|
||||
logger.V(6).Info("remove reservation because pod got replaced with new instance", "pod", klog.KObj(pod), "claim", klog.KRef(namespace, name))
|
||||
keepEntry = false
|
||||
case isPodDone(pod):
|
||||
logger.V(6).Info("remove reservation because pod will not run anymore", "pod", klog.KObj(pod), "claim", klog.KRef(namespace, name))
|
||||
keepEntry = false
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -187,6 +187,27 @@ func TestSyncHandler(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
expectedClaims: []resourcev1alpha2.ResourceClaim{*testClaim},
|
||||
expectedMetrics: expectedMetrics{0, 0},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "clear-reserved-when-done",
|
||||
pods: func() []*v1.Pod {
|
||||
pods := []*v1.Pod{testPodWithResource.DeepCopy()}
|
||||
pods[0].Status.Phase = v1.PodSucceeded
|
||||
return pods
|
||||
}(),
|
||||
key: claimKey(testClaimReserved),
|
||||
claims: func() []*resourcev1alpha2.ResourceClaim {
|
||||
claims := []*resourcev1alpha2.ResourceClaim{testClaimReserved.DeepCopy()}
|
||||
claims[0].OwnerReferences = nil
|
||||
return claims
|
||||
}(),
|
||||
expectedClaims: func() []resourcev1alpha2.ResourceClaim {
|
||||
claims := []resourcev1alpha2.ResourceClaim{*testClaimReserved.DeepCopy()}
|
||||
claims[0].OwnerReferences = nil
|
||||
claims[0].Status.ReservedFor = nil
|
||||
return claims
|
||||
}(),
|
||||
expectedMetrics: expectedMetrics{0, 0},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "remove-reserved",
|
||||
pods: []*v1.Pod{testPod},
|
||||
|
@ -230,6 +230,21 @@ var _ = ginkgo.Describe("[sig-node] DRA [Feature:DynamicResourceAllocation]", fu
|
||||
|
||||
b.testPod(ctx, f.ClientSet, pod)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
ginkgo.It("removes reservation from claim when pod is done", func(ctx context.Context) {
|
||||
parameters := b.parameters()
|
||||
pod := b.podExternal()
|
||||
claim := b.externalClaim(allocationMode)
|
||||
pod.Spec.Containers[0].Command = []string{"true"}
|
||||
b.create(ctx, parameters, claim, pod)
|
||||
|
||||
ginkgo.By("waiting for pod to finish")
|
||||
framework.ExpectNoError(e2epod.WaitForPodNoLongerRunningInNamespace(ctx, f.ClientSet, pod.Name, pod.Namespace), "wait for pod to finish")
|
||||
ginkgo.By("waiting for claim to be unreserved")
|
||||
gomega.Eventually(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) (*resourcev1alpha2.ResourceClaim, error) {
|
||||
return f.ClientSet.ResourceV1alpha2().ResourceClaims(pod.Namespace).Get(ctx, claim.Name, metav1.GetOptions{})
|
||||
}).WithTimeout(f.Timeouts.PodDelete).Should(gomega.HaveField("Status.ReservedFor", gomega.BeEmpty()), "reservation should have been removed")
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ginkgo.Context("with delayed allocation", func() {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user