fix buggy example for endpoint specification

This commit is contained in:
He Simei 2015-10-23 15:29:12 +08:00
parent c3d92de705
commit ec3493fd5e

View File

@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ In any of these scenarios you can define a service without a selector:
}
```
Because this has no selector, the corresponding `Endpoints` object will not be
Because this service has no selector, the corresponding `Endpoints` object will not be
created. You can manually map the service to your own specific endpoints:
```json
@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ created. You can manually map the service to your own specific endpoints:
{ "IP": "1.2.3.4" }
],
"ports": [
{ "port": 80 }
{ "port": 9376 }
]
}
]
@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ NOTE: Endpoint IPs may not be loopback (127.0.0.0/8), link-local
(169.254.0.0/16), or link-local multicast ((224.0.0.0/24).
Accessing a `Service` without a selector works the same as if it had selector.
The traffic will be routed to endpoints defined by the user (`1.2.3.4:80` in
The traffic will be routed to endpoints defined by the user (`1.2.3.4:9376` in
this example).
## Virtual IPs and service proxies