Merge pull request #22516 from kargakis/resolve-fenceposts-together

Auto commit by PR queue bot
This commit is contained in:
k8s-merge-robot 2016-03-07 07:37:12 -08:00
commit ec9c67d65d
5 changed files with 94 additions and 24 deletions

View File

@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ import (
deploymentutil "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/deployment"
utilerrors "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/errors"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/integer"
intstrutil "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/intstr"
labelsutil "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/labels"
podutil "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/pod"
utilruntime "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/runtime"
@ -843,7 +842,7 @@ func (dc *DeploymentController) reconcileOldReplicaSets(allRSs []*extensions.Rep
return false, fmt.Errorf("could not find available pods: %v", err)
}
maxUnavailable, err := intstrutil.GetValueFromIntOrPercent(&deployment.Spec.Strategy.RollingUpdate.MaxUnavailable, deployment.Spec.Replicas, false)
_, maxUnavailable, err := deploymentutil.ResolveFenceposts(&deployment.Spec.Strategy.RollingUpdate.MaxSurge, &deployment.Spec.Strategy.RollingUpdate.MaxUnavailable, deployment.Spec.Replicas)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
@ -940,7 +939,7 @@ func (dc *DeploymentController) cleanupUnhealthyReplicas(oldRSs []*extensions.Re
// scaleDownOldReplicaSetsForRollingUpdate scales down old replica sets when deployment strategy is "RollingUpdate".
// Need check maxUnavailable to ensure availability
func (dc *DeploymentController) scaleDownOldReplicaSetsForRollingUpdate(allRSs []*extensions.ReplicaSet, oldRSs []*extensions.ReplicaSet, deployment *extensions.Deployment) (int, error) {
maxUnavailable, err := intstrutil.GetValueFromIntOrPercent(&deployment.Spec.Strategy.RollingUpdate.MaxUnavailable, deployment.Spec.Replicas, false)
_, maxUnavailable, err := deploymentutil.ResolveFenceposts(&deployment.Spec.Strategy.RollingUpdate.MaxSurge, &deployment.Spec.Strategy.RollingUpdate.MaxUnavailable, deployment.Spec.Replicas)
if err != nil {
return 0, err
}

View File

@ -230,13 +230,14 @@ func TestDeploymentController_reconcileOldReplicaSets(t *testing.T) {
expectedOldReplicas int
}{
{
deploymentReplicas: 10,
maxUnavailable: intstr.FromInt(0),
oldReplicas: 10,
newReplicas: 0,
readyPodsFromOldRS: 10,
readyPodsFromNewRS: 0,
scaleExpected: false,
deploymentReplicas: 10,
maxUnavailable: intstr.FromInt(0),
oldReplicas: 10,
newReplicas: 0,
readyPodsFromOldRS: 10,
readyPodsFromNewRS: 0,
scaleExpected: true,
expectedOldReplicas: 9,
},
{
deploymentReplicas: 10,
@ -492,11 +493,12 @@ func TestDeploymentController_scaleDownOldReplicaSetsForRollingUpdate(t *testing
expectedOldReplicas int
}{
{
deploymentReplicas: 10,
maxUnavailable: intstr.FromInt(0),
readyPods: 10,
oldReplicas: 10,
scaleExpected: false,
deploymentReplicas: 10,
maxUnavailable: intstr.FromInt(0),
readyPods: 10,
oldReplicas: 10,
scaleExpected: true,
expectedOldReplicas: 9,
},
{
deploymentReplicas: 10,

View File

@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ import (
client "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/unversioned"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/labels"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/runtime"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/deployment"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/integer"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/intstr"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/wait"
@ -191,13 +192,9 @@ func (r *RollingUpdater) Update(config *RollingUpdaterConfig) error {
}
oldRc = updated
}
// The maximum pods which can go unavailable during the update.
maxUnavailable, err := intstr.GetValueFromIntOrPercent(&config.MaxUnavailable, desired, false)
if err != nil {
return err
}
// The maximum scaling increment.
maxSurge, err := intstr.GetValueFromIntOrPercent(&config.MaxSurge, desired, true)
// maxSurge is the maximum scaling increment and maxUnavailable are the maximum pods
// that can be unavailable during a rollout.
maxSurge, maxUnavailable, err := deployment.ResolveFenceposts(&config.MaxSurge, &config.MaxUnavailable, desired)
if err != nil {
return err
}

View File

@ -662,11 +662,11 @@ Scaling foo-v2 up to 2
`,
},
{
name: "1->1 100%/0 allow maxUnavailability",
name: "1->1 1/0 allow maxUnavailability",
oldRc: oldRc(1, 1),
newRc: newRc(0, 1),
newRcExists: false,
maxUnavail: intstr.FromString("100%"),
maxUnavail: intstr.FromString("1%"),
maxSurge: intstr.FromInt(0),
expected: []interface{}{
down{oldReady: 1, newReady: 0, to: 0},
@ -693,6 +693,48 @@ Scaling foo-v2 up to 1
Scaling up foo-v2 from 0 to 2, scaling down foo-v1 from 1 to 0 (keep 2 pods available, don't exceed 3 pods)
Scaling foo-v2 up to 2
Scaling foo-v1 down to 0
`,
},
{
name: "2->2 25/1 maxSurge trumps maxUnavailable",
oldRc: oldRc(2, 2),
newRc: newRc(0, 2),
newRcExists: false,
maxUnavail: intstr.FromString("25%"),
maxSurge: intstr.FromString("1%"),
expected: []interface{}{
up{1},
down{oldReady: 2, newReady: 1, to: 1},
up{2},
down{oldReady: 1, newReady: 2, to: 0},
},
output: `Created foo-v2
Scaling up foo-v2 from 0 to 2, scaling down foo-v1 from 2 to 0 (keep 2 pods available, don't exceed 3 pods)
Scaling foo-v2 up to 1
Scaling foo-v1 down to 1
Scaling foo-v2 up to 2
Scaling foo-v1 down to 0
`,
},
{
name: "2->2 25/0 maxUnavailable resolves to zero, then one",
oldRc: oldRc(2, 2),
newRc: newRc(0, 2),
newRcExists: false,
maxUnavail: intstr.FromString("25%"),
maxSurge: intstr.FromString("0%"),
expected: []interface{}{
down{oldReady: 2, newReady: 0, to: 1},
up{1},
down{oldReady: 1, newReady: 1, to: 0},
up{2},
},
output: `Created foo-v2
Scaling up foo-v2 from 0 to 2, scaling down foo-v1 from 2 to 0 (keep 1 pods available, don't exceed 2 pods)
Scaling foo-v1 down to 1
Scaling foo-v2 up to 1
Scaling foo-v1 down to 0
Scaling foo-v2 up to 2
`,
},
}

View File

@ -466,3 +466,33 @@ func WaitForObservedDeployment(getDeploymentFunc func() (*extensions.Deployment,
return deployment.Status.ObservedGeneration >= desiredGeneration, nil
})
}
// ResolveFenceposts resolves both maxSurge and maxUnavailable. This needs to happen in one
// step. For example:
//
// 2 desired, max unavailable 1%, surge 0% - should scale old(-1), then new(+1), then old(-1), then new(+1)
// 1 desired, max unavailable 1%, surge 0% - should scale old(-1), then new(+1)
// 2 desired, max unavailable 25%, surge 1% - should scale new(+1), then old(-1), then new(+1), then old(-1)
// 1 desired, max unavailable 25%, surge 1% - should scale new(+1), then old(-1)
// 2 desired, max unavailable 0%, surge 1% - should scale new(+1), then old(-1), then new(+1), then old(-1)
// 1 desired, max unavailable 0%, surge 1% - should scale new(+1), then old(-1)
func ResolveFenceposts(maxSurge, maxUnavailable *intstrutil.IntOrString, desired int) (int, int, error) {
surge, err := intstrutil.GetValueFromIntOrPercent(maxSurge, desired, true)
if err != nil {
return 0, 0, err
}
unavailable, err := intstrutil.GetValueFromIntOrPercent(maxUnavailable, desired, false)
if err != nil {
return 0, 0, err
}
if surge == 0 && unavailable == 0 {
// Validation should never allow the user to explicitly use zero values for both maxSurge
// maxUnavailable. Due to rounding down maxUnavailable though, it may resolve to zero.
// If both fenceposts resolve to zero, then we should set maxUnavailable to 1 on the
// theory that surge might not work due to quota.
unavailable = 1
}
return surge, unavailable, nil
}