mirror of
https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git
synced 2025-07-30 15:05:27 +00:00
Merge pull request #123428 from atiratree/UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy-GA
promote PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy to GA
This commit is contained in:
commit
fb0195df11
@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ const (
|
||||
// kep: http://kep.k8s.io/3018
|
||||
// alpha: v1.26
|
||||
// beta: v1.27
|
||||
// GA: v1.31
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Enables PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy for PodDisruptionBudgets
|
||||
PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy featuregate.Feature = "PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy"
|
||||
@ -1095,7 +1096,7 @@ var defaultKubernetesFeatureGates = map[featuregate.Feature]featuregate.FeatureS
|
||||
|
||||
NodeSwap: {Default: true, PreRelease: featuregate.Beta},
|
||||
|
||||
PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: {Default: true, PreRelease: featuregate.Beta},
|
||||
PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: {Default: true, PreRelease: featuregate.GA, LockToDefault: true}, // remove in 1.33
|
||||
|
||||
PersistentVolumeLastPhaseTransitionTime: {Default: true, PreRelease: featuregate.Beta},
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -230,12 +230,10 @@ func (r *EvictionREST) Create(ctx context.Context, name string, obj runtime.Obje
|
||||
// IsPodReady is the current implementation of IsHealthy
|
||||
// If the pod is healthy, it should be guarded by the PDB.
|
||||
if !podutil.IsPodReady(pod) {
|
||||
if feature.DefaultFeatureGate.Enabled(features.PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy) {
|
||||
if pdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy != nil && *pdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy == policyv1.AlwaysAllow {
|
||||
// Delete the unhealthy pod, it doesn't count towards currentHealthy and desiredHealthy and we should not decrement disruptionsAllowed.
|
||||
updateDeletionOptions = true
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
if pdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy != nil && *pdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy == policyv1.AlwaysAllow {
|
||||
// Delete the unhealthy pod, it doesn't count towards currentHealthy and desiredHealthy and we should not decrement disruptionsAllowed.
|
||||
updateDeletionOptions = true
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
// default nil and IfHealthyBudget policy
|
||||
if pdb.Status.CurrentHealthy >= pdb.Status.DesiredHealthy && pdb.Status.DesiredHealthy > 0 {
|
||||
|
@ -165,8 +165,6 @@ func TestEviction(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("%v with %v policy", tc.name, unhealthyPolicyStr(unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy)), func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
featuregatetesting.SetFeatureGateDuringTest(t, utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate, features.PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, true)
|
||||
|
||||
// same test runs multiple times, make copy of objects to have unique ones
|
||||
evictionCopy := tc.eviction.DeepCopy()
|
||||
var pdbsCopy []runtime.Object
|
||||
@ -530,8 +528,6 @@ func TestEvictionIgnorePDB(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("%v with %v policy", tc.name, unhealthyPolicyStr(unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy)), func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
featuregatetesting.SetFeatureGateDuringTest(t, utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate, features.PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, true)
|
||||
|
||||
// same test runs 3 times, make copy of objects to have unique ones
|
||||
evictionCopy := tc.eviction.DeepCopy()
|
||||
prcCopy := tc.prc.DeepCopy()
|
||||
|
@ -26,11 +26,9 @@ import (
|
||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/validation/field"
|
||||
genericapirequest "k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/endpoints/request"
|
||||
"k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/storage/names"
|
||||
utilfeature "k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/util/feature"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/api/legacyscheme"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/apis/policy"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/apis/policy/validation"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/features"
|
||||
"sigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v4/fieldpath"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -70,8 +68,6 @@ func (podDisruptionBudgetStrategy) PrepareForCreate(ctx context.Context, obj run
|
||||
podDisruptionBudget.Status = policy.PodDisruptionBudgetStatus{}
|
||||
|
||||
podDisruptionBudget.Generation = 1
|
||||
|
||||
dropDisabledFields(&podDisruptionBudget.Spec, nil)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// PrepareForUpdate clears fields that are not allowed to be set by end users on update.
|
||||
@ -87,8 +83,6 @@ func (podDisruptionBudgetStrategy) PrepareForUpdate(ctx context.Context, obj, ol
|
||||
if !apiequality.Semantic.DeepEqual(oldPodDisruptionBudget.Spec, newPodDisruptionBudget.Spec) {
|
||||
newPodDisruptionBudget.Generation = oldPodDisruptionBudget.Generation + 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dropDisabledFields(&newPodDisruptionBudget.Spec, &oldPodDisruptionBudget.Spec)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate validates a new PodDisruptionBudget.
|
||||
@ -188,23 +182,3 @@ func hasInvalidLabelValueInLabelSelector(pdb *policy.PodDisruptionBudget) bool {
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// dropDisabledFields removes disabled fields from the pod disruption budget spec.
|
||||
// This should be called from PrepareForCreate/PrepareForUpdate for all resources containing a pod disruption budget spec.
|
||||
func dropDisabledFields(pdbSpec, oldPDBSpec *policy.PodDisruptionBudgetSpec) {
|
||||
if !utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate.Enabled(features.PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy) {
|
||||
if !unhealthyPodEvictionPolicyInUse(oldPDBSpec) {
|
||||
pdbSpec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func unhealthyPodEvictionPolicyInUse(oldPDBSpec *policy.PodDisruptionBudgetSpec) bool {
|
||||
if oldPDBSpec == nil {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
if oldPDBSpec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy != nil {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -17,112 +17,16 @@ limitations under the License.
|
||||
package poddisruptionbudget
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"reflect"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
|
||||
|
||||
metav1 "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1"
|
||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/intstr"
|
||||
genericapirequest "k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/endpoints/request"
|
||||
utilfeature "k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/util/feature"
|
||||
featuregatetesting "k8s.io/component-base/featuregate/testing"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/apis/policy"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/features"
|
||||
"k8s.io/utils/ptr"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
type unhealthyPodEvictionPolicyStrategyTestCase struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy bool
|
||||
disablePDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyFeatureGateAfterCreate bool
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy *policy.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType
|
||||
expectedUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy *policy.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType
|
||||
expectedValidationErr bool
|
||||
updateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy *policy.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType
|
||||
expectedUpdateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy *policy.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType
|
||||
expectedValidationUpdateErr bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestPodDisruptionBudgetStrategy(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
tests := map[string]bool{
|
||||
"PodDisruptionBudget strategy with PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy feature gate disabled": false,
|
||||
"PodDisruptionBudget strategy with PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy feature gate enabled": true,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for name, enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy := range tests {
|
||||
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
featuregatetesting.SetFeatureGateDuringTest(t, utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate, features.PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy)
|
||||
testPodDisruptionBudgetStrategy(t)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
healthyPolicyTests := []unhealthyPodEvictionPolicyStrategyTestCase{
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "PodDisruptionBudget strategy with FeatureGate disabled should remove unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy",
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: false,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget),
|
||||
updateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget),
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "PodDisruptionBudget strategy with FeatureGate disabled should remove invalid unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy",
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: false,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr("Invalid"),
|
||||
updateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr("Invalid"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "PodDisruptionBudget strategy with FeatureGate enabled",
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "PodDisruptionBudget strategy with FeatureGate enabled should respect unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy",
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
expectedUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
updateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget),
|
||||
expectedUpdateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget),
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "PodDisruptionBudget strategy with FeatureGate enabled should fail invalid unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy",
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr("Invalid"),
|
||||
expectedValidationErr: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "PodDisruptionBudget strategy with FeatureGate enabled should fail invalid unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy when updated",
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
updateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr("Invalid"),
|
||||
expectedValidationUpdateErr: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "PodDisruptionBudget strategy with unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy should be updated when feature gate is disabled",
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
disablePDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyFeatureGateAfterCreate: true,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
expectedUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
updateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget),
|
||||
expectedUpdateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget),
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "PodDisruptionBudget strategy with unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy should not be updated to invalid when feature gate is disabled",
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
disablePDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyFeatureGateAfterCreate: true,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
expectedUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
updateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr("Invalid"),
|
||||
expectedValidationUpdateErr: true,
|
||||
expectedUpdateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, tc := range healthyPolicyTests {
|
||||
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
testPodDisruptionBudgetStrategyWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(t, tc)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func testPodDisruptionBudgetStrategyWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(t *testing.T, tc unhealthyPodEvictionPolicyStrategyTestCase) {
|
||||
featuregatetesting.SetFeatureGateDuringTest(t, utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate, features.PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, tc.enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy)
|
||||
ctx := genericapirequest.NewDefaultContext()
|
||||
if !Strategy.NamespaceScoped() {
|
||||
t.Errorf("PodDisruptionBudget must be namespace scoped")
|
||||
@ -138,70 +42,7 @@ func testPodDisruptionBudgetStrategyWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(t *testing.T,
|
||||
Spec: policy.PodDisruptionBudgetSpec{
|
||||
MinAvailable: &minAvailable,
|
||||
Selector: &metav1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels: validSelector},
|
||||
UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: tc.unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Strategy.PrepareForCreate(ctx, pdb)
|
||||
errs := Strategy.Validate(ctx, pdb)
|
||||
if len(errs) != 0 {
|
||||
if !tc.expectedValidationErr {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Unexpected error validating %v", errs)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return // no point going further when we have invalid PDB
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(errs) == 0 && tc.expectedValidationErr {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Expected error validating")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(pdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, tc.expectedUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Unexpected UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy set: expected %v, got %v", tc.expectedUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, pdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if tc.disablePDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyFeatureGateAfterCreate {
|
||||
featuregatetesting.SetFeatureGateDuringTest(t, utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate, features.PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
newPdb := &policy.PodDisruptionBudget{
|
||||
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: pdb.Name, Namespace: pdb.Namespace},
|
||||
Spec: pdb.Spec,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if tc.updateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy != nil {
|
||||
newPdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = tc.updateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Nothing in Spec changes: OK
|
||||
Strategy.PrepareForUpdate(ctx, newPdb, pdb)
|
||||
errs = Strategy.ValidateUpdate(ctx, newPdb, pdb)
|
||||
|
||||
if len(errs) != 0 {
|
||||
if !tc.expectedValidationUpdateErr {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Unexpected error updating PodDisruptionBudget %v", errs)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return // no point going further when we have invalid PDB
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(errs) == 0 && tc.expectedValidationUpdateErr {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Expected error updating PodDisruptionBudget")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(newPdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, tc.expectedUpdateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Unexpected UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy set: expected %v, got %v", tc.expectedUpdateUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, newPdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func testPodDisruptionBudgetStrategy(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
ctx := genericapirequest.NewDefaultContext()
|
||||
if !Strategy.NamespaceScoped() {
|
||||
t.Errorf("PodDisruptionBudget must be namespace scoped")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if Strategy.AllowCreateOnUpdate() {
|
||||
t.Errorf("PodDisruptionBudget should not allow create on update")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
validSelector := map[string]string{"a": "b"}
|
||||
minAvailable := intstr.FromInt32(3)
|
||||
pdb := &policy.PodDisruptionBudget{
|
||||
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "abc", Namespace: metav1.NamespaceDefault},
|
||||
Spec: policy.PodDisruptionBudgetSpec{
|
||||
MinAvailable: &minAvailable,
|
||||
Selector: &metav1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels: validSelector},
|
||||
UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: ptr.To(policy.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -256,6 +97,25 @@ func testPodDisruptionBudgetStrategy(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if len(errs) != 0 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Expected no error updating replacing MinAvailable with MaxUnavailable on poddisruptionbudgets.")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Changing UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy? OK
|
||||
newPdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = ptr.To(policy.IfHealthyBudget)
|
||||
Strategy.PrepareForUpdate(ctx, newPdb, pdb)
|
||||
errs = Strategy.ValidateUpdate(ctx, newPdb, pdb)
|
||||
if len(errs) != 0 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Expected no error on changing UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy on poddisruptionbudgets.")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if *newPdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy != policy.IfHealthyBudget {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Unexpected UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: expected %v, got %v", *newPdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, policy.IfHealthyBudget)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Changing to invalid UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy.
|
||||
newPdb.Spec.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = ptr.To(policy.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType("invalid"))
|
||||
Strategy.PrepareForUpdate(ctx, newPdb, pdb)
|
||||
errs = Strategy.ValidateUpdate(ctx, newPdb, pdb)
|
||||
if len(errs) == 0 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Expected error on changing to invalid UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy on poddisruptionbudgets.")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestPodDisruptionBudgetStatusStrategy(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
@ -371,86 +231,3 @@ func TestPodDisruptionBudgetStatusValidationByApiVersion(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestDropDisabledFields(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
tests := map[string]struct {
|
||||
oldSpec *policy.PodDisruptionBudgetSpec
|
||||
newSpec *policy.PodDisruptionBudgetSpec
|
||||
expectNewSpec *policy.PodDisruptionBudgetSpec
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy bool
|
||||
}{
|
||||
"disabled clears unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: false,
|
||||
oldSpec: nil,
|
||||
newSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
expectNewSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(nil),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"disabled does not allow updating unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: false,
|
||||
oldSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(nil),
|
||||
newSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
expectNewSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(nil),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"disabled preserves old unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy when both old and new have it": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: false,
|
||||
oldSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
newSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
expectNewSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"disabled allows updating unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: false,
|
||||
oldSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
newSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.AlwaysAllow)),
|
||||
expectNewSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.AlwaysAllow)),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"enabled preserve unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
oldSpec: nil,
|
||||
newSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
expectNewSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"enabled allows updating unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
oldSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(nil),
|
||||
newSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
expectNewSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"enabled preserve unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy when both old and new have it": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
oldSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
newSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
expectNewSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"enabled updates unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
oldSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.IfHealthyBudget)),
|
||||
newSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.AlwaysAllow)),
|
||||
expectNewSpec: specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPolicyPtr(policy.AlwaysAllow)),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for name, tc := range tests {
|
||||
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
featuregatetesting.SetFeatureGateDuringTest(t, utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate, features.PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, tc.enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy)
|
||||
|
||||
oldSpecBefore := tc.oldSpec.DeepCopy()
|
||||
dropDisabledFields(tc.newSpec, tc.oldSpec)
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(tc.newSpec, tc.expectNewSpec) {
|
||||
t.Error(cmp.Diff(tc.newSpec, tc.expectNewSpec))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(tc.oldSpec, oldSpecBefore) {
|
||||
t.Error(cmp.Diff(tc.oldSpec, oldSpecBefore))
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func unhealthyPolicyPtr(unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy policy.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType) *policy.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType {
|
||||
return &unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func specWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy *policy.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType) *policy.PodDisruptionBudgetSpec {
|
||||
return &policy.PodDisruptionBudgetSpec{
|
||||
UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ import (
|
||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/types"
|
||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/intstr"
|
||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/json"
|
||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/sets"
|
||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait"
|
||||
"k8s.io/client-go/dynamic"
|
||||
"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes"
|
||||
@ -45,9 +46,11 @@ import (
|
||||
"k8s.io/client-go/util/retry"
|
||||
podutil "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/api/v1/pod"
|
||||
"k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework"
|
||||
e2epod "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/pod"
|
||||
e2eskipper "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/skipper"
|
||||
imageutils "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/utils/image"
|
||||
admissionapi "k8s.io/pod-security-admission/api"
|
||||
"k8s.io/utils/ptr"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// schedulingTimeout is longer specifically because sometimes we need to wait
|
||||
@ -301,7 +304,7 @@ var _ = SIGDescribe("DisruptionController", func() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if c.maxUnavailable.String() != "" {
|
||||
createPDBMaxUnavailableOrDie(ctx, cs, ns, defaultName, c.maxUnavailable)
|
||||
createPDBMaxUnavailableOrDie(ctx, cs, ns, defaultName, c.maxUnavailable, nil)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Locate a running pod.
|
||||
@ -375,7 +378,7 @@ var _ = SIGDescribe("DisruptionController", func() {
|
||||
|
||||
ginkgo.By("Trying to evict the same pod we tried earlier which should now be evictable")
|
||||
waitForPodsOrDie(ctx, cs, ns, 3)
|
||||
waitForPdbToObserveHealthyPods(ctx, cs, ns, 3)
|
||||
waitForPdbToObserveHealthyPods(ctx, cs, ns, 3, 2)
|
||||
err = cs.CoreV1().Pods(ns).EvictV1(ctx, e)
|
||||
framework.ExpectNoError(err) // the eviction is now allowed
|
||||
|
||||
@ -414,6 +417,112 @@ var _ = SIGDescribe("DisruptionController", func() {
|
||||
framework.ExpectNoError(err) // the eviction is now allowed
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicyCases := []struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy *policyv1.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType
|
||||
podsShouldBecomeReadyFirst bool
|
||||
expectedSuccesfulPodEvictions int
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "should evict ready pods with Default UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy",
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: nil,
|
||||
podsShouldBecomeReadyFirst: true,
|
||||
expectedSuccesfulPodEvictions: 1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "should evict ready pods with IfHealthyBudget UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy",
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: ptr.To(policyv1.IfHealthyBudget),
|
||||
podsShouldBecomeReadyFirst: true,
|
||||
expectedSuccesfulPodEvictions: 1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "should evict ready pods with AlwaysAllow UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy",
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: ptr.To(policyv1.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
podsShouldBecomeReadyFirst: true,
|
||||
expectedSuccesfulPodEvictions: 1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "should not evict unready pods with Default UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy",
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: nil,
|
||||
podsShouldBecomeReadyFirst: false,
|
||||
expectedSuccesfulPodEvictions: 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "should not evict unready pods with IfHealthyBudget UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy",
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: ptr.To(policyv1.IfHealthyBudget),
|
||||
podsShouldBecomeReadyFirst: false,
|
||||
expectedSuccesfulPodEvictions: 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "should evict unready pods with AlwaysAllow UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy",
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: ptr.To(policyv1.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
podsShouldBecomeReadyFirst: false,
|
||||
expectedSuccesfulPodEvictions: 3,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
for i := range unhealthyPodEvictionPolicyCases {
|
||||
tc := unhealthyPodEvictionPolicyCases[i]
|
||||
|
||||
framework.It(tc.name, func(ctx context.Context) {
|
||||
ginkgo.By("Creating a pdb")
|
||||
createPDBMaxUnavailableOrDie(ctx, cs, ns, defaultName, intstr.FromInt32(1), tc.unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy)
|
||||
|
||||
ginkgo.By("Creating a replica set")
|
||||
rsName := "test-rs-with-delayed-ready"
|
||||
replicas := int32(3)
|
||||
rs := newRS(rsName, replicas, defaultLabels, WebserverImageName, WebserverImage, nil)
|
||||
rs.Labels["name"] = rsName
|
||||
initialDelaySeconds := framework.PodStartTimeout.Seconds() + 30
|
||||
if tc.podsShouldBecomeReadyFirst {
|
||||
initialDelaySeconds = 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
rs.Spec.Template.Spec.Containers[0].ReadinessProbe = &v1.Probe{
|
||||
ProbeHandler: v1.ProbeHandler{
|
||||
HTTPGet: &v1.HTTPGetAction{
|
||||
Path: "/index.html",
|
||||
Port: intstr.IntOrString{IntVal: 80},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
InitialDelaySeconds: int32(initialDelaySeconds),
|
||||
}
|
||||
_, err := cs.AppsV1().ReplicaSets(ns).Create(ctx, rs, metav1.CreateOptions{})
|
||||
framework.ExpectNoError(err, "Creating replica set %q in namespace %q", rs.Name, ns)
|
||||
|
||||
if tc.podsShouldBecomeReadyFirst {
|
||||
ginkgo.By("Wait for pods to be running and ready")
|
||||
waitForPodsOrDie(ctx, cs, ns, int(replicas))
|
||||
waitForPdbToObserveHealthyPods(ctx, cs, ns, replicas, replicas-1)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ginkgo.By("Wait for pods to be running and not ready")
|
||||
err := e2epod.VerifyPodsRunning(ctx, cs, ns, rsName, false, replicas)
|
||||
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
||||
waitForPdbToObserveHealthyPods(ctx, cs, ns, 0, replicas-1)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ginkgo.By("Try to evict all pods guarded by a PDB")
|
||||
podList, err := cs.CoreV1().Pods(ns).List(ctx, metav1.ListOptions{})
|
||||
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
||||
|
||||
evictedPods := sets.New[string]()
|
||||
for _, pod := range podList.Items {
|
||||
e := &policyv1.Eviction{
|
||||
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{
|
||||
Name: pod.Name,
|
||||
Namespace: ns,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
err = cs.CoreV1().Pods(ns).EvictV1(ctx, e)
|
||||
if err == nil {
|
||||
evictedPods.Insert(pod.Name)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
gomega.Expect(evictedPods).Should(gomega.HaveLen(tc.expectedSuccesfulPodEvictions))
|
||||
_, err = e2epod.WaitForPods(ctx, cs, ns, metav1.ListOptions{}, e2epod.Range{NoneMatching: true}, framework.PodDeleteTimeout, "evicted pods should be deleted", func(pod *v1.Pod) bool {
|
||||
return evictedPods.Has(pod.Name) && pod.DeletionTimestamp == nil
|
||||
})
|
||||
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
func createPDBMinAvailableOrDie(ctx context.Context, cs kubernetes.Interface, ns string, name string, minAvailable intstr.IntOrString, labels map[string]string) {
|
||||
@ -433,15 +542,16 @@ func createPDBMinAvailableOrDie(ctx context.Context, cs kubernetes.Interface, ns
|
||||
waitForPdbToBeProcessed(ctx, cs, ns, name)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func createPDBMaxUnavailableOrDie(ctx context.Context, cs kubernetes.Interface, ns string, name string, maxUnavailable intstr.IntOrString) {
|
||||
func createPDBMaxUnavailableOrDie(ctx context.Context, cs kubernetes.Interface, ns string, name string, maxUnavailable intstr.IntOrString, unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy *policyv1.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType) {
|
||||
pdb := policyv1.PodDisruptionBudget{
|
||||
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{
|
||||
Name: name,
|
||||
Namespace: ns,
|
||||
},
|
||||
Spec: policyv1.PodDisruptionBudgetSpec{
|
||||
Selector: &metav1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels: map[string]string{"foo": "bar"}},
|
||||
MaxUnavailable: &maxUnavailable,
|
||||
Selector: &metav1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels: map[string]string{"foo": "bar"}},
|
||||
MaxUnavailable: &maxUnavailable,
|
||||
UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
_, err := cs.PolicyV1().PodDisruptionBudgets(ns).Create(ctx, &pdb, metav1.CreateOptions{})
|
||||
@ -670,7 +780,7 @@ func waitForPdbToBeDeleted(ctx context.Context, cs kubernetes.Interface, ns stri
|
||||
framework.ExpectNoError(err, "Waiting for the pdb to be deleted in namespace %s", ns)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func waitForPdbToObserveHealthyPods(ctx context.Context, cs kubernetes.Interface, ns string, healthyCount int32) {
|
||||
func waitForPdbToObserveHealthyPods(ctx context.Context, cs kubernetes.Interface, ns string, healthyCount, desiredHealthy int32) {
|
||||
ginkgo.By("Waiting for the pdb to observed all healthy pods")
|
||||
err := wait.PollUntilContextTimeout(ctx, framework.Poll, wait.ForeverTestTimeout, true, func(ctx context.Context) (bool, error) {
|
||||
pdb, err := cs.PolicyV1().PodDisruptionBudgets(ns).Get(ctx, "foo", metav1.GetOptions{})
|
||||
@ -680,6 +790,9 @@ func waitForPdbToObserveHealthyPods(ctx context.Context, cs kubernetes.Interface
|
||||
if pdb.Status.CurrentHealthy != healthyCount {
|
||||
return false, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
if pdb.Status.DesiredHealthy != desiredHealthy {
|
||||
return false, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true, nil
|
||||
})
|
||||
framework.ExpectNoError(err, "Waiting for the pdb in namespace %s to observed %d healthy pods", ns, healthyCount)
|
||||
|
@ -434,40 +434,29 @@ func TestEvictionWithFinalizers(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// TestEvictionWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy tests eviction with a PDB that has a UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy
|
||||
func TestEvictionWithUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
cases := map[string]struct {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy bool
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy *policyv1.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType
|
||||
isPodReady bool
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy *policyv1.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType
|
||||
isPodReady bool
|
||||
}{
|
||||
"UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy disabled and policy not set": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: false,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: nil,
|
||||
isPodReady: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
"UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy enabled but policy not set": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: nil,
|
||||
isPodReady: true,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: nil,
|
||||
isPodReady: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
"UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy enabled but policy set to IfHealthyBudget with ready pod": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policyv1.IfHealthyBudget),
|
||||
isPodReady: true,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policyv1.IfHealthyBudget),
|
||||
isPodReady: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
"UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy enabled but policy set to AlwaysAllow with ready pod": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policyv1.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
isPodReady: true,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policyv1.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
isPodReady: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
"UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy enabled but policy set to AlwaysAllow with unready pod": {
|
||||
enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: true,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policyv1.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
isPodReady: false,
|
||||
unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy: unhealthyPolicyPtr(policyv1.AlwaysAllow),
|
||||
isPodReady: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
for name, tc := range cases {
|
||||
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
tCtx := ktesting.Init(t)
|
||||
featuregatetesting.SetFeatureGateDuringTest(t, feature.DefaultFeatureGate, features.PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, tc.enableUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy)
|
||||
closeFn, rm, informers, _, clientSet := rmSetup(tCtx, t)
|
||||
defer closeFn()
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user