The recently introduced failure handling in ExpectNoError depends on error
wrapping: if an error prefix gets added with `fmt.Errorf("foo: %v", err)`, then
ExpectNoError cannot detect that the root cause is an assertion failure and
then will add another useless "unexpected error" prefix and will not dump the
additional failure information (currently the backtrace inside the E2E
framework).
Instead of manually deciding on a case-by-case basis where %w is needed, all
error wrapping was updated automatically with
sed -i "s/fmt.Errorf\(.*\): '*\(%s\|%v\)'*\",\(.* err)\)/fmt.Errorf\1: %w\",\3/" $(git grep -l 'fmt.Errorf' test/e2e*)
This may be unnecessary in some cases, but it's not wrong.
None of the users of the functions passed anything other than nil or an empty
map and the implementation ignore the parameter - it seems like a candidate for
simplification.
The recently introduced failure handling in ExpectNoError depends on error
wrapping: if an error prefix gets added with `fmt.Errorf("foo: %v", err)`, then
ExpectNoError cannot detect that the root cause is an assertion failure and
then will add another useless "unexpected error" prefix and will not dump the
additional failure information (currently the backtrace inside the E2E
framework).
Instead of manually deciding on a case-by-case basis where %w is needed, all
error wrapping was updated automatically with
sed -i "s/fmt.Errorf\(.*\): '*\(%s\|%v\)'*\",\(.* err)\)/fmt.Errorf\1: %w\",\3/" $(git grep -l 'fmt.Errorf' test/e2e*)
This may be unnecessary in some cases, but it's not wrong.
None of the users of the functions passed anything other than nil or an empty
map and the implementation ignore the parameter - it seems like a candidate for
simplification.
The `runPausePod` timeout was 1 minute previously which appears to be
too short and timing out in some tests.
Switch to `f.Timeouts.PodStartShort` which is the common timeout used to wait
for pods to start which defaults to 5min.
Also refactor to remove `runPausePodWithoutTimeout` and instead rely on
`runPausePod` since we do not make the timeout customizable directly
(it can be changed via the test framework if desired).
Signed-off-by: David Porter <david@porter.me>
There are two runtime class tests which required the container runtime
config to include explicit configuration for `test-handler`. The current
logic skips these tests in non GCE environments. This skip is too strict
since the test is skipped in node e2e environments and in other
environments such as kind, which support running the test and also
configure `test-handler`.
Instead of skipping based on provider, add a new function
`NodeSupportsPreconfiguredRuntimeClassHandler` which examines the
underlying container runtime config and checks if the config includes
`test-handler`. The check is a bit brittle since it assumes container
runtime config paths, but it is a net improvement over skipping the test
entirely on non GCE environments.
This results in the test working in the common test environments, namely
GCE kube-up, node e2e, and kind.
Signed-off-by: David Porter <david@porter.me>
The intend of timeout handling (for the entire "It" and not just a few calls)
becomes more obvious and simpler when using ginkgo.NodeTimeout as decorator.
All code must use the context from Ginkgo when doing API calls or polling for a
change, otherwise the code would not return immediately when the test gets
aborted.
ginkgo.DeferCleanup has multiple advantages:
- The cleanup operation can get registered if and only if needed.
- No need to return a cleanup function that the caller must invoke.
- Automatically determines whether a context is needed, which will
simplify the introduction of context parameters.
- Ginkgo's timeline shows when it executes the cleanup operation.
Adding "ctx" as parameter in the previous commit led to some linter errors
about code that overwrites "ctx" without using it.
This gets fixed by replacing context.Background or context.TODO in those code
lines with the new ctx parameter.
Two context.WithCancel calls can get removed completely because the context
automatically gets cancelled by Ginkgo when the test returns.
Every ginkgo callback should return immediately when a timeout occurs or the
test run manually gets aborted with CTRL-C. To do that, they must take a ctx
parameter and pass it through to all code which might block.
This is a first automated step towards that: the additional parameter got added
with
sed -i 's/\(framework.ConformanceIt\|ginkgo.It\)\(.*\)func() {$/\1\2func(ctx context.Context) {/' \
$(git grep -l -e framework.ConformanceIt -e ginkgo.It )
$GOPATH/bin/goimports -w $(git status | grep modified: | sed -e 's/.* //')
log_test.go was left unchanged.
e2e test validates the following 3 endpoints
- listCoreV1LimitRangeForAllNamespaces
- patchCoreV1NamespacedLimitRange
- deleteCoreV1CollectionNamespacedLimitRange
The "pause" pods that are being run in the scheduling tests are
sometimes launched in system namespaces. Therefore even if a test
is considered to be running on a "baseline" Pod Security admission
level, its "baseline" pods would fail to run if the global PSa
enforcement policy is set to "restricted" - the system namespaces
have no PSa labels.
The "pause" pods run by this test can actually easily run with
"restricted" security context, and so this patch turns them
into just that.
Besides, the using of method might lead to a `concurrent map writes`
issue per the discussion here: https://github.com/onsi/ginkgo/issues/970
Signed-off-by: Dave Chen <dave.chen@arm.com>
- update all the import statements
- run hack/pin-dependency.sh to change pinned dependency versions
- run hack/update-vendor.sh to update go.mod files and the vendor directory
- update the method signatures for custom reporters
Signed-off-by: Dave Chen <dave.chen@arm.com>
* De-share the Handler struct in core API
An upcoming PR adds a handler that only applies on one of these paths.
Having fields that don't work seems bad.
This never should have been shared. Lifecycle hooks are like a "write"
while probes are more like a "read". HTTPGet and TCPSocket don't really
make sense as lifecycle hooks (but I can't take that back). When we add
gRPC, it is EXPLICITLY a health check (defined by gRPC) not an arbitrary
RPC - so a probe makes sense but a hook does not.
In the future I can also see adding lifecycle hooks that don't make
sense as probes. E.g. 'sleep' is a common lifecycle request. The only
option is `exec`, which requires having a sleep binary in your image.
* Run update scripts
Otherwise, nodeNameToPodList[nodeName] list will have all its references
identical (corresponding to the control variable reference).
Thus, making all the pods in the list identical.
The purpose of the pod created by `createBalancedPodForNodes()` is to ensure
that all nodes have equal resource requests (as seen by the scheduler). This
prevents the default scheduling behavior (which attempts to balance resource requests)
from interfering with e2e's which test other priorities/score plugins.
Because the scheduler only worries about requests, specifying `Limits` in this pod
is unnecessary. In fact, if the calculated "balancing" limit is too low, it can cause
the balancing pod to never start due to OOMKill errors, leading to flakes and failures.
To run the tests in a single node cluster, create two pods consuming 2/5 of the extended resource instead of one consuming 2/3.
The low priority pod will be consuming 2/5 of the extended resource instead so in case there's only a single node,
a high priority pod consuming 2/5 of the extended resource can be still scheduled. Thus, making sure only the low priority pod
gets preempted once the preemptor pod consuming 2/5 of the extended resource gets scheduled while keeping the high priority pod untouched.
