The messages for container lifecycle events are subtly inconsistent
and should be unified.
First, the field format for containers is hard to parse for a human,
so include the container name directly in the message for create
and start, and for kill remove the container runtime prefix.
Second, the pulling image event has inconsistent capitalization, fix
that to be sentence without punctuation.
Third, the kill container event was unnecessarily wordy and inconsistent
with the create and start events. Make the following changes:
* Use 'Stopping' instead of 'Killing' since kill is usually reserved for
when we decide to hard stop a container
* Send the event before we dispatch the prestop hook, since this is an
"in-progress" style event vs a "already completed" type event
* Remove the 'cri-o://' / 'docker://' prefix by printing the container
name instead of id (we already do that replacement at the lower level
to prevent high cardinality events)
* Use 'message' instead of 'reason' as the argument name since this is a
string for humans field, not a string for machines field
* Remove the hash values on the container spec changed event because no
human will ever be able to do anything with the hash value
* Use 'Stopping container %s(, explanation)?' form without periods to
follow event conventions
The end result is a more pleasant message for humans:
```
35m Normal Created Pod Created container
35m Normal Started Pod Started container
10m Normal Killing Pod Killing container cri-o://installer:Need to kill Pod
10m Normal Pulling Pod pulling image "registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/openshift/origin-v4.0-2019-02-10-172026@sha256:3da5303d4384d24691721c1cf2333584ba60e8f82c9e782f593623ce8f83ddc5"
```
becomes
```
35m Normal Created Pod Created container installer
35m Normal Started Pod Started container installer
10m Normal Killing Pod Stopping container installer
10m Normal Pulling Pod Pulling image "registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/openshift/origin-v4.0-2019-02-10-172026@sha256:3da5303d4384d24691721c1cf2333584ba60e8f82c9e782f593623ce8f83ddc5"
```
systemd is the recommended driver as per the setup of running
the kubelet using systemd as the init system. Add a preflight
check that throws a warning if this isn't the case.
Currently JoinConfigFileAndDefaultsToInternalConfig is doing a couple of
different things depending on its parameters. It:
- loads a versioned JoinConfiguration from an YAML file.
- returns defaulted JoinConfiguration allowing for some overrides.
In order to make code more manageable, the following steps are taken:
- Introduce LoadJoinConfigurationFromFile, which loads a versioned
JoinConfiguration from an YAML file, defaults it (both dynamically and
statically), converts it to internal JoinConfiguration and validates it.
- Introduce DefaultedJoinConfiguration, which returns defaulted (both
dynamically and statically) and verified internal JoinConfiguration.
The possibility of overwriting defaults via versioned JoinConfiguration is
retained.
- Re-implement JoinConfigFileAndDefaultsToInternalConfig to use
LoadJoinConfigurationFromFile and DefaultedJoinConfiguration.
- Replace some calls to JoinConfigFileAndDefaultsToInternalConfig with calls to
either LoadJoinConfigurationFromFile or DefaultedJoinConfiguration where
appropriate.
- Rename JoinConfigFileAndDefaultsToInternalConfig to the more appropriate name
LoadOrDefaultJoinConfiguration.
Signed-off-by: Rostislav M. Georgiev <rostislavg@vmware.com>
The previous version of CudaVectorAdd test image can still be used
in our testing. A later change will extend the existing gpu e2e tests
to run pods with two containers. One with CudaVectorAdd version1 and
the other with CudaVectorAdd version2 so that we can test both
Cuda versions.
`elbv2.AddTags` doesn't seem to support assigning the same set of
tags to multiple resources at once leading to the following error:
Error adding tags after modifying load balancer targets:
"ValidationError: Only one resource can be tagged at a time"
This can happen when using AWS NLB with multiple listeners pointing
to different node ports.
When k8s creates a NLB it creates a target group per listener along
with installing security group ingress rules allowing the traffic to
reach the k8s nodes.
Unfortunately if those target groups are not tagged, k8s will not
manage them, thinking it is not the owner.
This small changes assigns tags one resource at a time instead of
batching them as before.
Signed-off-by: Brice Figureau <brice@daysofwonder.com>
