Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67347, 67307, 67358, 67364, 67385). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
delete the busyboxImage and mountTest var and change use imageutils
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
delete the ```busyboxImage```,```mountTest``` variable and change everything to use ```imageutils.GetE2EImage(imageutils.BusyBox)```, ```imageutils.GetE2EImage(imageutils.MountTest)```
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67237
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @mikedanese
/assign @mikedanese
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67294, 67320, 67335, 67334, 67325). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix some minor mistakes in e2e
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix some minor mistakes in e2e
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67294, 67320, 67335, 67334, 67325). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use framework.GetClusterZones() instead of getZoneNames()
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix todo:
use framework.GetClusterZones() instead of getZoneNames()
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67071, 66906, 66722, 67276, 67039). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
#50102 Task 1: Move apimachinery/pkg/watch.Until into client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithoutRetry
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is a split off from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/50102 to go in smaller pieces.
Moves `apimachinery/pkg/watch.Until` into `client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithoutRetry` and adds context so it is cancelable.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
**Dev release note**:
```dev-release-note
`apimachinery/pkg/watch.Until` has been moved to `client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithoutRetry`.
While switching please consider using the new `client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithSync` or `client-go/tools/watch.Until`.
```
/cc @smarterclayton @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
/milestone v1.12
/priority important-soon
/kind bug
(bug after the main PR which is this split from)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67071, 66906, 66722, 67276, 67039). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Promoting "[sig-storage] Secrets should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace" to Conformance
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
An consolidated effort to resolve the issue https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/66875
> _[sig-storage] Secrets should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace_
Promoting mentioned e2e test for Conformance as it -
- Validates that secret with same name can be created in different namespaces but secrets which reside in same namespace as that of pod can be only be accessed from volume mounted in the container.
- Improves api coverage including prioritized Pod API lists. https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/issues/220#issuecomment-393344061
> GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/log
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
POST /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
PUT /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/status
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
No Flakes Found.
```
• [SLOW TEST:16.326 seconds]
[sig-storage] Secrets
/home/vagrant/go-workspace/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/secrets_volume.go:33
should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace [NodeConformance]
/home/vagrant/go-workspace/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/secrets_volume.go:86
------------------------------
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Aug 7 07:12:44.133: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on all node
Aug 7 07:12:44.134: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on node 1
Ran 1 of 1020 Specs in 16.441 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 1019 Skipped PASS
All tests passed...
Will keep running them until they fail.
This was attempt #40
No, seriously... you can probably stop now.
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/area conformance
@kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 61212, 66369, 66446, 66895, 66969). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Promoting configmap binarydata support [NodeConformance] test to conformance
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**e2e:** _[sig-storage] ConfigMap binary data should be reflected in volume [NodeConformance]_
Promotes mentioned e2e to conformance as it -
1. Validates ConfigMap's binarydata support effectively
2. Improves API Coverage for prioritized api lists. (https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/issues/220#issuecomment-393344061)
> GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/log
POST /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
PUT /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/status
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
No Flakes found.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/area conformance
@kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
Currently, the PVC protection controller will remove its finalizer when
all Pods using a PVC reach at least a Terminating state. However,
certain volumes cannot be guaranteed to be umounted until a Pod is
deleted. Only Pods not in the current pods list can be considered
deleted, so we're removing the exception to not check Terminating Pods.
Signed-off-by: Jose A. Rivera <jarrpa@redhat.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Correct spelling errors in the comments
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
End2End tests for DynamicVolumeProvisioning of EBS
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add end2end tests to exercise `DynamicProvisioningScheduling` features for EBS. The tests make sure `WaitForFirstConsumer` and `AllowedTopologies` specified in a EBS storage class has the desired effect.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Tests features added to 217a3d8902
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
/sig storage
/assign @msau42 @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66984, 67236, 67216, 62721, 67106). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Allow running various storage e2e tests on custom images
Ubuntu image is treated as custom image in some e2e tests. We whitelist both ubuntu and custom to run the storage tests.
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
/assign @msau42
/release-note-none
/sig storage
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Remove ARCH specific image consideration from e2e tests
Change-Id: I309fec49b030a4d457890f25d2f69e7c641c03fd
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
All e2e test images are now using multi-arch manifests so we should stop
looking up and using images that are specific to runtime.GOARCH
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
tests: Skips AfterEach step if provider is not supported
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The BeforeEach step for cluster_size_autoscaling is skipped if
the provider is not gce or gke. The AfterEach step should also
be skipped, since nothing was done.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes#67199
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67058, 67083, 67220, 67222, 67209). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use const v1.ProtocolTCP replace of string TCP
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
use const v1.ProtocolTCP replace of string TCP
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
All e2e test images are now using multi-arch manifests so we should stop
looking up and using images that are specific to runtime.GOARCH
Change-Id: I5f3fd6e9a42b9fb88891c19e28a2dfcf7a14be82
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65297, 67179, 67116, 67011, 66842). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
clean up unused parameter in func restrictedPod and testPrivilegedPods
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
clean up unused parameter in func restrictedPod and testPrivilegedPods
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/kind cleanup
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
The BeforeEach step for cluster_size_autoscaling is skipped if
the provider is not gce or gke. The AfterEach step should also
be skipped, since nothing was done.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67061, 66589, 67121, 67149). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Get load balancer name per provider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
GetLoadBalancerName() should be implemented per cloud provider as opposed to one neutral implementation.
This PR will address this by moving `cloudprovider.GetLoadBalancerName()` to the `LoadBalancer interface` and then provide an implementation for each cloud provider, while maintaining previously expected functionality.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes [#43173](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/43173)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This is a work in progress. Looking for feedback as I work on this, from any interested parties.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
GCE: add a crictl test
This verifies that crictl is available on the node.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add Deployment conformance tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**: @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-architecture-pr-reviews
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67042, 66480, 67053). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
HPA: Make dynamicRequestSizeInMillicores bigger
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
HPA e2e tests specify 20 as requestSizeMillicores on resource-consumer
for making CPU workload to test HPA feature, and the value is
hard-coded as 20. That means the tests expect 2% CPU workload on every
resource-consumer process, but actual CPU usage(4 - 6%) is over than
the expected usage on some environment. Then HPA scales many pods than
the test expected, and the test is failed.
To make these tests stable, this changes the value to 100 (10% CPU
workload on each process).
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67051
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**: None
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
delete broken test for a deprecated feature.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This test is broken and it's for a deprecated feature.
https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/tree/master/service-loadbalancer
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67085, 66559, 67089). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Allow setting tolerations in test framework
Add support for setting tolerations on pods in e2e framework. This is needed for adding e2e tests for autoscaling respecting taints&tolerations.
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66196, 67016, 66807, 67023). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
e2e: Ensure that sysrq-trigger is enabled before use
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
On Ubuntu (and, presumably, other distros too), the default configuration prohibits some sysrq operations. Before performing sysrq operations in the e2e testing, ensure that all operations are permitted.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66196, 67016, 66807, 67023). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Make admission webhooks conversion convert CONNECT body correctly
Fix#59759.
1. Make apiserver pass connectRequest.Options directly to the admission layer. All other information in rest.ConnectRequest is present in admission attributes.
2. Make the scope.Kind of pod/attach, pod/exec, pod/portforward, node/proxy, service/proxy to their respective options Kind, instead of the parent Kind.
I've tested it locally, the conversion is working correctly for "kubectl attach". I'll add e2e tests.
I'll keep this to myself until I add the tests, but cc @mikedanese @liggitt RE. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66633.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66196, 67016, 66807, 67023). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
e2e test harness - use busybox from dockerhub
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Use the same pattern used everywhere in the e2e test
harness, just use "busybox" (from dockerhub) instead
of using the one from k8s.gcr.io registry.
Change-Id: I700b59f73fd31f2ed6d7f995cd9441839857dd44
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Use the same pattern everywhere in the e2e test
harness, use busybox (from dockerhub) instead
of using the one from k8s.gcr.io registry.
Change-Id: I57c3b867408c1f9478a8909c26744ea0368ff003
HPA e2e tests specify 20 as requestSizeMillicores on resource-consumer
for making CPU workload to test HPA feature, and the value is
hard-coded as 20. That means the tests expect 2% CPU workload on every
resource-consumer processes, but actual CPU usage(4 - 6%) is over than
the expected usage on some environment. Then HPA scales many pods than
the test expected, and the test is failed.
To make these tests stable, this changes the value to 100 (10% CPU
workload on each process).
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 58058, 67033, 66921, 66956). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Added comment to track deleteOptions.OrphanDependents e2e for conformance promotion in future
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Added a comment to track below mentioned e2e tests for conformance promotion in future.
- Prevents additional effort to evaluate again for promotion.
**E2E -**
- Garbage collector should orphan pods created by rc if deleteOptions.OrphanDependents is nil
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65427
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/65427#issuecomment-409642330
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/area conformance
@kubernetes/sig-architecture-pr-reviews
