The voting in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/117288 led to
one check that got rejected ("ifElseChain: rewrite if-else to switch
statement") and several that are "nice to know".
golangci-lint's support for issue "severity" is too limited to identify "nice
to know" issues in the output (filtering is only by linter without considering
the issue text; not part of text output). Therefore a third configuration gets
added which emits all issues (must fix and nits). The intention is to use
the "strict" configuration in pull-kubernetes-verify and the "hints"
configuration in a new non-blocking pull-kubernetes-linter-hints.
That way, "must fix" issues will block merging while issues that may be useful
will show up in a failed optional job. However, that job then also contains
"must fix" issues, partly because filtering out those would make the
configuration a lot larger and is likely to be unreliably (all "must fix"
issues would need to be identified and listed), partly because it may be useful
to have all issues in one place.
The previous approach of manually keeping two configs in sync with special
comments didn't scale to three configs. Now a single golangci.yaml.in with
text/template constructs contains the source for all three configs. A new
simple CLI frontend for text/template (cmd/gotemplate) is used by
hack/update-golangci-lint-config.sh to generate the three flavors.
Several verify scripts used the same pattern of "check for clean working tree,
generated files, check for diffs". The code for that is now in
kube::verify::generated, defined in hack/lib/verify-generated.sh, and those
scripts just source that.
PVC and containers shared the same ResourceRequirements struct to define their
API. When resource claims were added, that struct got extended, which
accidentally also changed the PVC API. To avoid such a mistake from happening
again, PVC now uses its own VolumeResourceRequirements struct.
The `Claims` field gets removed because risk of breaking someone is low:
theoretically, YAML files which have a claims field for volumes now
get rejected when validating against the OpenAPI. Such files
have never made sense and should be fixed.
Code that uses the struct definitions needs to be updated.
The fact that the .status.loadBalancer field can be set while .spec.type
is not "LoadBalancer" is a flub. Any spec update will already clear
.status.ingress, so it's hard to really rely on this. After this
change, updates which try to set this combination will fail validation.
Existing cases of this will not be broken. Any spec/metadata update
will clear it (no error) and this is the only stanza of status.
New gate "AllowServiceLBStatusOnNonLB" is off by default, but can be
enabled if this change actually breaks someone, which seems exceeedingly
unlikely.
This reverts commit bd6f548746.
Running as serial didn't completely eliminate the flake so I think
there's something more going on here. Reverting the change to serial
since its not a solution.
