* Add e2e tests for admission webhooks MatchCondition fields
Signed-off-by: Amine Hilaly <hilalyamine@gmail.com>
* improve naming to distinguish tests
* adding e2e for mutating webhooks and match conditions
* Use `ginkgo.It` instead of `framework.ConformaceIt` and cleanup
resrources after creation
* Enable AdmissionWebhookMatchConditions feature
* Tag only matchcondition tests
* Improve expected error message for denied requests.
* Rename `onlyAllowLeaseObjectMatchConditions` to
`excludeLeasesMatchConditions`
* remove [Alpha] tag from AdmissionWebhookMatchConditions tests
* Using `gomega.Expect` instead of `framworkfail`
* Remove [Feature:AdmissionWebhookMatchConditions] tag
Signed-off-by: Amine <hilalyamine@gmail.com>
* Improve e2e names to specify whether it's using Validating or Mutating admission webhooks
---------
Signed-off-by: Amine Hilaly <hilalyamine@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Amine <hilalyamine@gmail.com>
Currently, the test queries the local node, which is not correct for most kubernetes environments.
Instead, ssh to the target node and call journalctl there
Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
Passing "/bin/sh" arguments to agnhost container has caused failure by
itself.
This fixes the container image, allowing it to properly test the restart
triggered by probe failure.
* Support namespace access from cel expression in validatingadmissionpolicy.
* Whitelist the exposed fields in namespace object and add test
* better handling of cluster-scoped resources.
* [API REVIEW] namespaceObject in Expression doc.
* compatibility with composition.
* generated: ./hack/update-codegen.sh && ./hack/update-openapi-spec.sh
* workaround namespace of namespace is unexpectedly set.
* basic test coverage for namespaceObject.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jiahui Feng <jhf@google.com>
* [API REVIEW] ValidatingAdmissionPolicyStatucController config.
worker count.
* ValidatingAdmissionPolicyStatus controller.
* remove CEL typechecking from API server.
* fix initializer tests.
* remove type checking integration tests
from API server integration tests.
* validatingadmissionpolicy-status options.
* grant access to VAP controller.
* add defaulting unit test.
* generated: ./hack/update-codegen.sh
* add OWNERS for VAP status controller.
* type checking test case.
When someone decides that a Pod should definitely run on a specific node, they
can create the Pod with spec.nodeName already set. Some custom scheduler might
do that. Then kubelet starts to check the pod and (if DRA is enabled) will
refuse to run it, either because the claims are still waiting for the first
consumer or the pod wasn't added to reservedFor. Both are things the scheduler
normally does.
Also, if a pod got scheduled while the DRA feature was off in the
kube-scheduler, a pod can reach the same state.
The resource claim controller can handle these two cases by taking over for the
kube-scheduler when nodeName is set. Triggering an allocation is simpler than
in the scheduler because all it takes is creating the right
PodSchedulingContext with spec.selectedNode set. There's no need to list nodes
because that choice was already made, permanently. Adding the pod to
reservedFor also isn't hard.
What's currently missing is triggering de-allocation of claims to re-allocate
them for the desired node. This is not important for claims that get created
for the pod from a template and then only get used once, but it might be
worthwhile to add de-allocation in the future.
If something goes wrong during the Azure cloud detection, trying to cast
the returned value will result in the following panic and give no clue
as to what the error was.
```
panic: interface conversion: cloudprovider.Interface is nil, not *azure.Cloud
goroutine 1 [running]:
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/providers/azure.newProvider()
test/e2e/framework/providers/azure/azure.go:50 +0x2b5
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.SetupProviderConfig({0xc0007966b8, 0x5})
test/e2e/framework/provider.go:82 +0x1a6
```
The recommendation and default in the controller helper code is to set
ReservedFor to the pod which triggered delayed allocation. However, this
is neither required nor enforced. Therefore we should also test the fallback
path were kube-scheduler itself adds the pod to ReservedFor.
Combining all prepare/unprepare operations for a pod enables plugins to
optimize the execution. Plugins can continue to use the v1beta2 API for now,
but should switch. The new API is designed so that plugins which want to work
on each claim one-by-one can do so and then report errors for each claim
separately, i.e. partial success is supported.
The main problem probably was that
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/118862 moved creating the first
pod before setting up the callback which blocks allocating one claim for that
pod. This is racy because allocations happen in the background.
The test also was unnecessarily complex and hard to read:
- The intended effect can be achieved with three instead of four claims.
- It wasn't clear which claim has "external-claim-other" as name.
Using the claim variable avoids that.
Generating the name avoids all potential name collisions. It's not clear how
much of a problem that was because users can avoid them and the deterministic
names for generic ephemeral volumes have not led to reports from users. But
using generated names is not too hard either.
What makes it relatively easy is that the new pod.status.resourceClaimStatus
map stores the generated name for kubelet and node authorizer, i.e. the
information in the pod is sufficient to determine the name of the
ResourceClaim.
The resource claim controller becomes a bit more complex and now needs
permission to modify the pod status. The new failure scenario of "ResourceClaim
created, updating pod status fails" is handled with the help of a new special
"resource.kubernetes.io/pod-claim-name" annotation that together with the owner
reference identifies exactly for what a ResourceClaim was generated, so
updating the pod status can be retried for existing ResourceClaims.
The transition from deterministic names is handled with a special case for that
recovery code path: a ResourceClaim with no annotation and a name that follows
the Kubernetes <= 1.27 naming pattern is assumed to be generated for that pod
claim and gets added to the pod status.
There's no immediate need for it, but just in case that it may become relevant,
the name of the generated ResourceClaim may also be left unset to record that
no claim was needed. Components processing such a pod can skip whatever they
normally would do for the claim. To ensure that they do and also cover other
cases properly ("no known field is set", "must check ownership"),
resourceclaim.Name gets extended.
When a pod is done, but not getting removed yet for while, then a claim that
got generated for that pod can be deleted already. This then also triggers
deallocation.
Invalid flags are detected by flag parsing, but optional arguments are just
passed through to the E2E suites. None of them support any, so rejecting them
with an error message is useful because it helps catch typos (like a missing
hyphen before a flag).
