Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38720, 38533)
Priority REST Mapper: Actually honor user choice
```release-note
Fixes bug in resolving client-requested API versions
```
RESTMapping takes a desired GroupKind, and a set of versions, and
returns a rest mapper for the first matching version. It also has a
list of built-in discovered prioritized versions, to which it appends
the user versions.
However, when it goes to parse the versions, it parses them as
GroupVersions. Since only a version was passed, the group will be the
empty group (""), which will only match rest mappings for the empty
group, ergo, none of the user's versions will match if they are
attempting a match for a non-emtpy-group GroupKind.
This fixes that by taking the parsed GroupVersion, and overriding the
Group with the Group from the passed-in GroupKind.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38648, 38747)
fix typo
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix typo.
**Release note**:
```NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fake clientset propagates namespace to objects on create/update
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Unlike the real Clientset, the fake Clientset requires creates and updates of namespaced objects to have the namespace specified in the target runtime object metadata. This difference forces API clients using the fake Clientset for test to propagate the namespaces to the runtime objects in the production code. This propagation is unnecessary and should be handled by the fake implementation.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixeskubernetes/client-go#48
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Node Conformance: Node Conformance CI
For https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37252.
The first 2 commits of this PR are from #38150 and #38152. Please review those 2 PRs first, they are both minor cleanup.
This PR:
* Add `TestSuite` interface in `test/e2e_node/remote` to separate test suite logic (packaging, deploy, run test) from VM lifecycle management logic, so that different test suites can share the same VM lifecycle management logic.
* Different test suites such as node e2e, node conformance, node soaking, cri validation etc. should implement different `TestSuite`.
* `test/e2e_node/runner/remote` will initialize and run different test suite based on the subcommand.
* Add `run-kubelet-mode` which only starts and monitors kubelet, similar with `run-services-mode`. The reason we need this:
* Unlike node e2e, node conformance test doesn't start kubelet inside the test suite (in fact, in the future node e2e shouldn't do that either), it assumes kubelet is already running before the test.
* In fact, node e2e should use similar node bootstrap script like cluster e2e, and the bootstrap script should initialize the node with all necessary node software including kubelet. However, it's not the case now.
* The easiest way for now is to reuse the kubelet start logic in the test suite. So in this PR, we added `run-kubelet-mode`, and use the test binary as a kubelet launcher to start kubelet before running the test.
* Implement node e2e `TestSuite`.
* Implement node conformance `TestSuite`. Use `docker save` and `docker load` to create and deploy conformance docker image; Start kubelet by running test binary in `run-kubelet-mode`; Run conformance test with `docker run`.
This PR will make it easy to implement continuous integration node soaking test and cri validation test (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35266).
/cc @kubernetes/sig-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38638, 38334)
Remove Azure Subnet RouteTable check
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
PR Removes the subnet configuration check for Azure cloudprovider. The subnet check ensures that the subnet is associated with the Route Table. However if the VNET is in a different Azure Resource Group then the check fails, even if the subnet is already valid. This a stop gap fix, to allow Kubernetes to be deployed to Custom VNETs in Azure, that may reside in a different resource group to the cluster.
fixes#38134
@colemickens
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use the cluster name in the names of the firewall rules that allow cluster-internal traffic to disambiguate the rules belonging to different clusters.
Also dropping the network name from these firewall rule names.
Network name was used to disambiguate firewall rules in a given network.
However, since two clusters cannot share a name in a GCE project, this
sufficiently disambiguates the firewall rule names. A potential confusion
arises when someone tries to create a firewall rule with the same name
in a different network, but that's also an indication that they shouldn't
be doing that.
@jszczepkowski due to PR #33094
@ixdy for test-infra
cc @kubernetes/sig-federation @nikhiljindal
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38689, 38743, 38734, 38430)
apply sandbox network mode based on network plugin
This allows CRI to use docker's network bridge. Can be combined with noop network plugin. This allows to use docker0 with no further configuration. Good for tools like minikube/hyperkube.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Refactor remotecommand options parsing
Prerequisite to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/36187 - This separates the options from the request, so they can be pulled from elsewhere.
/cc @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38727, 38726, 38347, 38348)
Add 'privileged' to sandbox to indicate if any container might be privileged in it, document privileged
Right now, the privileged flag is this magic thing which does "whatever Docker does". This documents it to make it a little less magic.
In addition, due to how rkt uses `systemd-nspawn` as an outer layer of isolation in creating the sandbox, it's helpful to know beforehand whether the pod will be privileged so additional security options can be applied earlier / applied at all.
I suspect the same indication will be useful for userns since userns should also occur at the pod layer, but it's possible that will be a separate/additional field.
cc @lucab @jonboulle @yujuhong @feiskyer @kubernetes/sig-node
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38727, 38726, 38347, 38348)
Second pass of renaming kube-dns configure files
Continue work of #38523.
Not sure why cluster/centos/deployAddons.sh was omitted in previous PR. Also deletes the non-use `DNS_REPLICAS` var and changes `-rc` suffix in hack/local-up-cluster.sh.
@thockin @bowei @deads2k
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Ensure the GCI metadata files do not have newline at the end
Fixes#36708
@dchen1107 @Random-Liu can one of you help with the review?
cc @kubernetes/goog-image FYI
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Inode Eviction Test is Flaky
This Pull Request:
Marks the InodeEviciton test as flaky
Increases the timeout for disk pressure because coreos has nearly 2 million inodes.
Decreases the status polling interval so we can see eviction ordering better.
@Random-Liu
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/runtime
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @deads2k @caesarxuchao
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35436, 37090, 38700)
Significantly speed-up make
- do not call `dirname` for every go file => gives **>8 seconds** on each make run
- do not preserve time during rsync from `_output/local/go/bin` to `_output/local/bin/<os>/<arch>`:
We do a touch after our rebuild heuristic triggers.
If in `_output/local/go/bin` you have an older binary and go decides that it's good enough, the following rsync will "preserve the timestamp" of the binary copy in `_output/local/bin/<os>/<arch>`. This reverts the effect of any previous `touch` (compare `Makefile.generated_files`).
We do a complete rsync of binaries for each go target, not only the one which is rebuilt. This means that later go targets will overwrite the timestamps of freshly touched binaries. Hence, our rebuild heuristic will trigger again and again when running `make`.
This PR remove the "preserve mtime" from the rsync call. Hence, the effect of touch is not reverted anymore by later rsyncs.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35436, 37090, 38700)
Make iscsi pv/pvc aware of nodiskconflict feature
Being iscsi a `RWO, ROX` volume we should conflict if more than one pod is using same iscsi LUN.
Signed-off-by: Humble Chirammal <hchiramm@redhat.com>
