Automatic merge from submit-queue
hack: update cherry-pick script to show subject when patch is split
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is a continuation of #34049, which worked, but then I realized some patch files have more than one subject, see example: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/34228
This cleans the output so it looks like this:
```
Automated cherry pick of #32593
Cherry pick of #32593 on release-1.4.
#32593: Fix audit_test regex for iso8601 timestamps
```
pretty!!!
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
Signed-off-by: Jess Frazelle <acidburn@google.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use nodeutil.GetHostIP consistently when talking to nodes
Most of our communications from apiserver -> nodes used
nodutil.GetNodeHostIP, but a few places didn't - and this meant that the
node name needed to be resolvable _and_ we needed to populate valid IP
addresses.
```release-note
The apiserver now uses addresses reported by the kubelet in the Node object's status for apiserver->kubelet communications, rather than the name of the Node object. The address type used defaults to `InternalIP`, `ExternalIP`, and `LegacyHostIP` address types, in that order.
```
The original fix (#33147) sourced the correct `node-helper.sh` but set
`node_os_distribution` instead of `NODE_OS_DISTRIBUTION`. The
`set-node-image` function is imported indirectly via `source
"${KUBE_ROOT}/cluster/kube-util.sh"`, which in turn (in the GCE case)
sources `cluster/gce/util.sh`. Since the `set-node-image` function
relies on the `NODE_OS_DISTRIBUTION` variable, the original fix
did not have the entire intended effect.
I have confirmed that cherry-picking #33147 into the `release-1.4`
branch and layering this commit on top of it make for a successful
upgrade from a GCI based K8s 1.3 cluster to a GCI based K8s 1.4 cluster.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Federated deployment controller - part 1
Based on federated replicaset controller (copy + find/replace).
Remaining stuff:
- refacing out common elements to libs
- using owerref in pod analysis
- e2e tests
- renaming concurrency flag for rs and reusing it in deployment
- updating only one cluster at a time if rollingupdate strategy is used.
cc: @quinton-hoole @kubernetes/sig-cluster-federation
**Release note**:
```release-note
Federated deployment controller that supports the same api as the regular kubernetes deployment controller.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
hack/e2e.go: listen for Interrupt signal and attempt cleanup if run with --down
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**: adds a listener on ^C, so if `hack/e2e.go` is run with `--down` and the user ^C, then it will attempt to cleanup the resources.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```release-note
NONE
```
Signed-off-by: Jess Frazelle <me@jessfraz.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue
refactor controller as posthook when configured and enabled
builds on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/33785 .
Models the bootstrap controller as a PostHook which is added when its API group is available and its configured.
@liggitt Stefan is out for a while.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Match GroupVersionKind against specific version
Currently when multiple GVK match a specific kind in `KindForGroupVersionKinds` only the first will be matched, which not necessarily will be the correct one. I'm proposing to extend this to pick the best match, instead.
Here's my problematic use-case, of course it involves ScheduledJobs 😉:
I have a `GroupVersions` with `batch/v1` and `batch/v2alpha1` in that order. I'm calling `KindForGroupVersionKinds` with kind `batch/v2alpha1 ScheduledJob` and that currently results this matching first `GroupVersion`, instead of picking more concrete one. There's a [clear description](ee77d4e6ca/pkg/api/unversioned/group_version.go (L183)) why it is on single `GroupVersion`, but `GroupVersions` should pick this more carefully.
@deads2k this is your baby, wdyt?
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[Part 1] Implementation of equivalence pod
Part 1 of #30844
This PR:
- Refactored `predicate.go`, so that `GetResourceRequest` can be used in other places to `GetEquivalencePod`.
- Implement a `equivalence_cache.go` to deal with all information we need to calculate an equivalent pod.
- Define and register a `RegisterGetEquivalencePodFunction `.
Work in next PR:
- The update of `equivalence_cache.go`
- Unit test
- Integration/e2e test
I think we can begin from the `equivalence_cache.go`? Thanks. cc @wojtek-t @davidopp
If I missed any other necessary part, please point it out.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update documentation for running e2e tests locally
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The docs for running e2e tests locally needs to be updated.
check_node_count option has been removed and developers usually
need to perform additional steps do get it going.
