Apply patch

This commit is contained in:
open-swe[bot]
2025-07-28 23:17:49 +00:00
parent c05b0e1fea
commit 53b3d20fae

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
# LangSmith Workspace Stats Mismatch - Specific Debugging Steps
## Overview
This document provides specific debugging steps to investigate the mismatch between the sidebar count (55) and table display (5) of tracing projects in LangSmith.
## 1. Comparing API Responses Between /current/stats and Projects Endpoints
### Step 1.1: Capture API Responses
```bash
# Capture the workspace stats endpoint response
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/workspaces/current/stats" \
> workspace_stats_response.json
# Capture the projects/sessions endpoint response
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/sessions" \
> projects_response.json
# Alternative projects endpoint (if different)
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/projects" \
> projects_alt_response.json
```
### Step 1.2: Analyze Response Structure
```bash
# Examine the stats response structure
jq '.' workspace_stats_response.json
# Look specifically for tracer_session_count
jq '.tracer_session_count' workspace_stats_response.json
# Count actual projects in the response
jq '. | length' projects_response.json
# If projects are nested in a data field
jq '.data | length' projects_response.json
```
### Step 1.3: Compare Key Fields
Create a comparison script:
```python
import json
# Load responses
with open('workspace_stats_response.json') as f:
stats = json.load(f)
with open('projects_response.json') as f:
projects = json.load(f)
print(f"Stats endpoint tracer_session_count: {stats.get('tracer_session_count', 'Not found')}")
print(f"Projects endpoint count: {len(projects.get('data', projects))}")
print(f"Difference: {stats.get('tracer_session_count', 0) - len(projects.get('data', projects))}")
```
## 2. Checking for Pagination/Filtering Differences
### Step 2.1: Test Pagination Parameters
```bash
# Test projects endpoint with different pagination parameters
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/sessions?limit=100&offset=0" \
> projects_page1.json
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/sessions?limit=100&offset=100" \
> projects_page2.json
# Check if there are more pages
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/sessions?limit=1000" \
> projects_all.json
```
### Step 2.2: Analyze Pagination Response
```python
import json
# Check pagination metadata
with open('projects_page1.json') as f:
page1 = json.load(f)
# Look for pagination fields
print("Pagination fields:")
for key in ['total', 'count', 'has_more', 'next_page', 'total_count']:
if key in page1:
print(f" {key}: {page1[key]}")
# Count total across all pages
total_projects = 0
for page_file in ['projects_page1.json', 'projects_page2.json']:
try:
with open(page_file) as f:
page_data = json.load(f)
projects_in_page = len(page_data.get('data', page_data))
total_projects += projects_in_page
print(f"{page_file}: {projects_in_page} projects")
except FileNotFoundError:
break
print(f"Total projects across pages: {total_projects}")
```
### Step 2.3: Test Different Filter Parameters
```bash
# Test with different date ranges
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/sessions?start_time=2024-01-01&end_time=2024-12-31" \
> projects_filtered_date.json
# Test with different status filters
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/sessions?status=active" \
> projects_active.json
# Test without any filters
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/sessions" \
> projects_unfiltered.json
```
## 3. Verifying Permission-Based Visibility
### Step 3.1: Test with Different User Contexts
```bash
# If you have access to different API keys/users, test with each
export LANGSMITH_API_KEY_USER1="your_user1_key"
export LANGSMITH_API_KEY_ADMIN="your_admin_key"
# Test stats endpoint with different users
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY_USER1" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/workspaces/current/stats" \
> stats_user1.json
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY_ADMIN" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/workspaces/current/stats" \
> stats_admin.json
# Test projects endpoint with different users
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY_USER1" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/sessions" \
> projects_user1.json
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY_ADMIN" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/sessions" \
> projects_admin.json
```
### Step 3.2: Compare Permission-Based Results
```python
import json
def compare_user_responses(stats_file1, stats_file2, projects_file1, projects_file2, user1_name, user2_name):
with open(stats_file1) as f:
stats1 = json.load(f)
with open(stats_file2) as f:
stats2 = json.load(f)
with open(projects_file1) as f:
projects1 = json.load(f)
with open(projects_file2) as f:
projects2 = json.load(f)
print(f"{user1_name} stats count: {stats1.get('tracer_session_count', 'N/A')}")
print(f"{user2_name} stats count: {stats2.get('tracer_session_count', 'N/A')}")
print(f"{user1_name} projects count: {len(projects1.get('data', projects1))}")
print(f"{user2_name} projects count: {len(projects2.get('data', projects2))}")
# Run comparison
compare_user_responses('stats_user1.json', 'stats_admin.json',
'projects_user1.json', 'projects_admin.json',
'Regular User', 'Admin User')
```
### Step 3.3: Check Workspace Permissions
```bash
# Get current user info
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/users/current" \
> current_user.json
# Get workspace members and roles
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $LANGSMITH_API_KEY" \
"${LANGSMITH_API_URL}/workspaces/current/members" \
> workspace_members.json
```
## 4. Investigating Data Consistency Between Stats Counting Logic and Table Display Logic
### Step 4.1: Analyze Project Metadata
```python
import json
from collections import Counter
from datetime import datetime
with open('projects_response.json') as f:
projects_data = json.load(f)
projects = projects_data.get('data', projects_data)
# Analyze project statuses
statuses = [p.get('status', 'unknown') for p in projects]
status_counts = Counter(statuses)
print("Project statuses:")
for status, count in status_counts.items():
print(f" {status}: {count}")
# Analyze creation dates
creation_dates = []
for p in projects:
if 'created_at' in p:
try:
date = datetime.fromisoformat(p['created_at'].replace('Z', '+00:00'))
creation_dates.append(date)
except:
pass
if creation_dates:
print(f"\nDate range:")
print(f" Earliest: {min(creation_dates)}")
print(f" Latest: {max(creation_dates)}")
# Check for archived/hidden projects
archived_count = sum(1 for p in projects if p.get('archived', False))
hidden_count = sum(1 for p in projects if p.get('hidden', False))
print(f"\nSpecial statuses:")
print(f" Archived: {archived_count}")
print(f" Hidden: {hidden_count}")
```
### Step 4.2: Cross-Reference with Stats Breakdown
```python
import json
# Load both responses
with open('workspace_stats_response.json') as f:
stats = json.load(f)
with open('projects_response.json') as f:
projects_data = json.load(f)
# Look for detailed breakdowns in stats
print("Stats response fields:")
for key, value in stats.items():
if isinstance(value, (int, float)):
print(f" {key}: {value}")
# Check if stats include different types of sessions/projects
if 'session_breakdown' in stats:
print("\nSession breakdown:")
for key, value in stats['session_breakdown'].items():
print(f" {key}: {value}")
```
### Step 4.3: Identify Discrepancy Patterns
```python
import json
def analyze_discrepancy():
with open('workspace_stats_response.json') as f:
stats = json.load(f)
with open('projects_response.json') as f:
projects_data = json.load(f)
stats_count = stats.get('tracer_session_count', 0)
projects_count = len(projects_data.get('data', projects_data))
discrepancy = stats_count - projects_count
print(f"Analysis Summary:")
print(f" Stats endpoint count: {stats_count}")
print(f" Projects endpoint count: {projects_count}")
print(f" Discrepancy: {discrepancy}")
print(f" Discrepancy percentage: {(discrepancy/stats_count)*100:.1f}%")
# Hypotheses based on discrepancy size
if discrepancy > 0:
print(f"\nPossible explanations for {discrepancy} missing projects:")
print(" - Projects are archived/hidden in the table view")
print(" - Permission-based filtering in the table")
print(" - Stats counting deleted projects that no longer appear")
print(" - Different time ranges between endpoints")
print(" - Caching issues in the stats endpoint")
return discrepancy
analyze_discrepancy()
```
## Execution Checklist
- [ ] **API Response Comparison**
- [ ] Captured both endpoint responses
- [ ] Analyzed response structures
- [ ] Compared key counting fields
- [ ] **Pagination/Filtering Analysis**
- [ ] Tested pagination parameters
- [ ] Verified total count across pages
- [ ] Tested different filter combinations
- [ ] **Permission Verification**
- [ ] Tested with different user roles (if available)
- [ ] Compared permission-based results
- [ ] Checked workspace member permissions
- [ ] **Data Consistency Investigation**
- [ ] Analyzed project metadata and statuses
- [ ] Cross-referenced with stats breakdown
- [ ] Identified discrepancy patterns
## Expected Outcomes
After completing these debugging steps, you should have:
1. **Clear API Response Comparison**: Understanding of what each endpoint returns and how they differ
2. **Pagination Clarity**: Knowledge of whether pagination is causing the discrepancy
3. **Permission Impact**: Understanding of how user permissions affect the counts
4. **Data Consistency Insights**: Identification of the root cause of the 55 vs 5 mismatch
## Next Steps
Based on the debugging results:
- If pagination is the issue: Implement proper pagination handling in the frontend
- If permissions are the cause: Align permission logic between endpoints
- If data consistency is the problem: Report to LangSmith backend team with evidence
- If filtering differences exist: Standardize filtering logic across endpoints