We have a test
[test_structured_few_shot_examples](ad4333ca03/libs/standard-tests/langchain_tests/integration_tests/chat_models.py (L546))
in standard integration tests that implements a version of tool-calling
few shot examples that works with ~all tested providers. The formulation
supported by ~all providers is: `human message, tool call, tool message,
AI reponse`.
Here we update
`langchain_core.utils.function_calling.tool_example_to_messages` to
support this formulation.
The `tool_example_to_messages` util is undocumented outside of our API
reference. IMO, if we are testing that this function works across all
providers, it can be helpful to feature it in our guides. The structured
few-shot examples we document at the moment require users to implement
this function and can be simplified.
* Removed `ruff check --select I` as `I` is already selected and checked
in the main `ruff check` command
* Added checks for non-empty `PYTHON_FILES`
* Run `ruff check` only on `PYTHON_FILES`
Co-authored-by: Erick Friis <erick@langchain.dev>
Here we allow standard tests to specify a value for `tool_choice` via a
`tool_choice_value` property, which defaults to None.
Chat models [available in
Together](https://docs.together.ai/docs/chat-models) have issues passing
standard tool calling tests:
- llama 3.1 models currently [appear to rely on user-side
parsing](https://docs.together.ai/docs/llama-3-function-calling) in
Together;
- Mixtral-8x7B and Mistral-7B (currently tested) consistently do not
call tools in some tests.
Specifying tool_choice also lets us remove an existing `xfail` and use a
smaller model in Groq tests.
This PR deprecates the beta upsert APIs in vectorstore.
We'll introduce them in a V2 abstraction instead to keep the existing
vectorstore implementations lighter weight.
The main problem with the existing APIs is that it's a bit more
challenging to
implement the correct behavior w/ respect to IDs since ID can be present
in
both the function signature and as an optional attribute on the document
object.
But VectorStores that pass the standard tests should have implemented
the semantics properly!
---------
Co-authored-by: Erick Friis <erick@langchain.dev>
- **Description:** This includes Pydantic field metadata in
`_create_subset_model_v2` so that it gets included in the final
serialized form that get sent out.
- **Issue:** #25031
- **Dependencies:** n/a
- **Twitter handle:** @gramliu
---------
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <baskaryan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <22008038+baskaryan@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds a minimal document indexer abstraction.
The goal of this abstraction is to allow developers to create custom
retrievers that also have a standard indexing API and allow updating the
document content in them.
The abstraction comes with a test suite that can verify that the indexer
implements the correct semantics.
This is an iteration over a previous PRs
(https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/24364). The main
difference is that we're sub-classing from BaseRetriever in this
iteration and as so have consolidated the sync and async interfaces.
The main problem with the current design is that runt time search
configuration has to be specified at init rather than provided at run
time.
We will likely resolve this issue in one of the two ways:
(1) Define a method (`get_retriever`) that will allow creating a
retriever at run time with a specific configuration.. If we do this, we
will likely break the subclass on BaseRetriever
(2) Generalize base retriever so it can support structured queries
---------
Co-authored-by: Erick Friis <erick@langchain.dev>
Anthropic models (including via Bedrock and other cloud platforms)
accept a status/is_error attribute on tool messages/results
(specifically in `tool_result` content blocks for Anthropic API). Adding
a ToolMessage.status attribute so that users can set this attribute when
using those models
- Mixtral with Groq has started consistently failing tool calling tests.
Here we restrict testing to llama 3.1.
- `.schema` is deprecated in pydantic proper in favor of
`.model_json_schema`.
After this standard tests will test with the following combinations:
1. pydantic.BaseModel
2. pydantic.v1.BaseModel
If ran within a matrix, it'll covert both pydantic.BaseModel originating
from
pydantic 1 and the one defined in pydantic 2.
