**Description:**
This PR makes argument parsing for Ollama tool calls more robust. Some
LLMs—including Ollama—may return arguments as Python-style dictionaries
with single quotes (e.g., `{'a': 1}`), which are not valid JSON and
previously caused parsing to fail.
The updated `_parse_json_string` method in
`langchain_ollama.chat_models` now attempts standard JSON parsing and,
if that fails, falls back to `ast.literal_eval` for safe evaluation of
Python-style dictionaries. This improves interoperability with LLMs and
fixes a common usability issue for tool-based agents.
**Issue:**
Closes#30910
**Dependencies:**
None
**Tests:**
- Added new unit tests for double-quoted JSON, single-quoted dicts,
mixed quoting, and malformed/failure cases.
- All tests pass locally, including new coverage for single-quoted
inputs.
**Notes:**
- No breaking changes.
- No new dependencies introduced.
- Code is formatted and linted (`ruff format`, `ruff check`).
- If maintainers have suggestions for further improvements, I’m happy to
revise!
Thank you for maintaining LangChain! Looking forward to your feedback.
The `num_gpu` parameter in `OllamaEmbeddings` was not being passed to
the Ollama client in the async embedding method, causing GPU
acceleration settings to be ignored when using async operations.
## Problem
The issue was in the `aembed_documents` method where the `options`
parameter (containing `num_gpu` and other configuration) was missing:
```python
# Sync method (working correctly)
return self._client.embed(
self.model, texts, options=self._default_params, keep_alive=self.keep_alive
)["embeddings"]
# Async method (missing options parameter)
return (
await self._async_client.embed(
self.model, texts, keep_alive=self.keep_alive # ❌ No options!
)
)["embeddings"]
```
This meant that when users specified `num_gpu=4` (or any other GPU
configuration), it would work with sync calls but be ignored with async
calls.
## Solution
Added the missing `options=self._default_params` parameter to the async
embed call to match the sync version:
```python
# Fixed async method
return (
await self._async_client.embed(
self.model,
texts,
options=self._default_params, # ✅ Now includes num_gpu!
keep_alive=self.keep_alive,
)
)["embeddings"]
```
## Validation
- ✅ Added unit test to verify options are correctly passed in both sync
and async methods
- ✅ All existing tests continue to pass
- ✅ Manual testing confirms `num_gpu` parameter now works correctly
- ✅ Code passes linting and formatting checks
The fix ensures that GPU configuration works consistently across both
synchronous and asynchronous embedding operations.
Fixes#32059.
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions,
customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context
Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more [Copilot coding agent
tips](https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-tips) in the docs.
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: mdrxy <61371264+mdrxy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mason Daugherty <github@mdrxy.com>
Description
The Perplexity chat model already returns a search_results field, but
LangChain dropped it when mapping Perplexity responses to
additional_kwargs.
This patch adds "search_results" to the allowed attribute lists in both
_stream and _generate, so downstream code can access it just like
images, citations, or related_questions.
Dependencies
None. The change is purely internal; no new imports or optional
dependencies required.
https://community.perplexity.ai/t/new-feature-search-results-field-with-richer-metadata/398
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mason Daugherty <github@mdrxy.com>
## Description
When ChatDeepSeek invokes a tool that returns a list, it results in an
openai.UnprocessableEntityError due to a failure in deserializing the
JSON body.
The root of the problem is that ChatDeepSeek uses BaseChatOpenAI
internally, but the APIs are not identical: OpenAI v1/chat/completions
accepts arrays as tool results, but Deepseek API does not.
As a solution added `_get_request_payload` method to ChatDeepSeek, which
inherits the behavior from BaseChatOpenAI but adds a step to stringify
tool message content in case the content is an array. I also add a unit
test for this.
From the linked issue you can find the full reproducible example the
reporter of the issue provided. After the changes it works as expected.
Source: [Deepseek
docs](https://api-docs.deepseek.com/api/create-chat-completion/)
Source: [OpenAI
docs](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create)
## Issue
Fixes#31394
## Dependencies:
No new dependencies.
## Twitter handle:
Don't have one.
---------
Co-authored-by: Mason Daugherty <github@mdrxy.com>
Co-authored-by: Mason Daugherty <mason@langchain.dev>
* update model validation due to change in [Ollama
client](https://github.com/ollama/ollama) - ensure you are running the
latest version (0.9.6) to use `validate_model_on_init`
* add code example and fix formatting for ChatOllama reasoning
* ensure that setting `reasoning` in invocation kwargs overrides
class-level setting
* tests
* New `reasoning` (bool) param to support toggling [Ollama
thinking](https://ollama.com/blog/thinking) (#31573, #31700). If
`reasoning=True`, Ollama's `thinking` content will be placed in the
model responses' `additional_kwargs.reasoning_content`.
* Supported by:
* ChatOllama (class level, invocation level TODO)
* OllamaLLM (TODO)
* Added tests to ensure streaming tool calls is successful (#29129)
* Refactored tests that relied on `extract_reasoning()`
* Myriad docs additions and consistency/typo fixes
* Improved type safety in some spots
Closes#29129
Addresses #31573 and #31700
Supersedes #31701
* Ensure access to local model during `ChatOllama` instantiation
(#27720). This adds a new param `validate_model_on_init` (default:
`true`)
* Catch a few more errors from the Ollama client to assist users
