Enforce solver constraints

- Don't sign installed packages during finalizer execution
- Enforce solver constraints: build ALO and AMO rules taking into account
  that the current package might not be selected at all.
- Force uninstalls on upgrade
- Enable option to tell uninstall to ignore conflict with the analized system state,
  as we don't want any conflict with the installed to raise during the upgrade.
  In this way we both force uninstalls and we avoid to check with conflicts
  against the current system state which is pending to deletion.
  This is due to the fact that now the solver enforces the constraints
  and explictly denies two packages of the same version installed.
- Adapt test as now we generate more constraints, which makes the solver more
  noisy on the package that are explictly selected or not
This commit is contained in:
Ettore Di Giacinto 2020-02-27 18:26:48 +01:00
parent 65b17f5283
commit 5bcc8d112a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 1ADA699B145A2D1C
9 changed files with 152 additions and 93 deletions

View File

@ -106,23 +106,39 @@ func (l *LuetInstaller) Upgrade(s *System) error {
return err
}
// First match packages against repositories by priority
// matches := syncedRepos.PackageMatches(p)
allRepos := pkg.NewInMemoryDatabase(false)
syncedRepos.SyncDatabase(allRepos)
// compute a "big" world
solv := solver.NewResolver(s.Database, allRepos, pkg.NewInMemoryDatabase(false), l.Options.SolverOptions.Resolver())
uninstall, solution, err := solv.Upgrade()
uninstall, solution, err := solv.Upgrade(false)
if err != nil {
return errors.Wrap(err, "Failed solving solution for upgrade")
}
// We don't want any conflict with the installed to raise during the upgrade.
// In this way we both force uninstalls and we avoid to check with conflicts
// against the current system state which is pending to deletion
// E.g. you can't check for conflicts for an upgrade of a new version of A
// if the old A results installed in the system. This is due to the fact that
// now the solver enforces the constraints and explictly denies two packages
// of the same version installed.
forced := false
if l.Options.Force {
forced = true
}
l.Options.Force = true
for _, u := range uninstall {
Info(":package: Marked for deletion", u.HumanReadableString())
err := l.Uninstall(u, s)
if err != nil && !l.Options.Force {
Error("Failed uninstall for ", u.HumanReadableString())
return errors.Wrap(err, "uninstalling "+u.HumanReadableString())
}
}
l.Options.Force = forced
toInstall := []pkg.Package{}
for _, assertion := range solution {
@ -249,29 +265,27 @@ func (l *LuetInstaller) Install(cp []pkg.Package, s *System) error {
close(all)
wg.Wait()
for _, c := range toInstall {
// Annotate to the system that the package was installed
_, err := s.Database.CreatePackage(c.Package)
if err != nil && !l.Options.Force {
return errors.Wrap(err, "Failed creating package")
}
}
executedFinalizer := map[string]bool{}
// TODO: Lower those errors as warning
for _, w := range p {
// Finalizers needs to run in order and in sequence.
ordered := solution.Order(allRepos, w.GetFingerPrint())
ORDER:
for _, ass := range ordered {
if ass.Value {
// Annotate to the system that the package was installed
if _, err := s.Database.FindPackage(ass.Package); err == nil {
err := s.Database.UpdatePackage(ass.Package)
if err != nil && !l.Options.Force {
return errors.Wrap(err, "Failed updating package")
}
} else {
_, err := s.Database.CreatePackage(ass.Package)
if err != nil && !l.Options.Force {
return errors.Wrap(err, "Failed creating package")
}
}
installed, ok := toInstall[ass.Package.GetFingerPrint()]
if !ok {
return errors.New("Couldn't find ArtifactMatch for " + ass.Package.HumanReadableString())
// It was a dep already installed in the system, so we can skip it safely
continue ORDER
}
treePackage, err := installed.Repository.GetTree().GetDatabase().FindPackage(ass.Package)
@ -381,12 +395,17 @@ func (l *LuetInstaller) uninstall(p pkg.Package, s *System) error {
}
func (l *LuetInstaller) Uninstall(p pkg.Package, s *System) error {
// compute uninstall from all world - remove packages in parallel - run uninstall finalizer (in order) - mark the uninstallation in db
// compute uninstall from all world - remove packages in parallel - run uninstall finalizer (in order) TODO - mark the uninstallation in db
// Get installed definition
checkConflicts := true
if l.Options.Force == true {
checkConflicts = false
}
if !l.Options.NoDeps {
solv := solver.NewResolver(s.Database, s.Database, pkg.NewInMemoryDatabase(false), l.Options.SolverOptions.Resolver())
solution, err := solv.Uninstall(p)
solution, err := solv.Uninstall(p, checkConflicts)
if err != nil && !l.Options.Force {
return errors.Wrap(err, "Could not solve the uninstall constraints. Tip: try with --solver-type qlearning or with --force, or by removing packages excluding their dependencies with --nodeps")
}

View File

@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ func (pack *DefaultPackage) BuildFormula(definitiondb PackageDatabase, db Packag
}
B := bf.Var(encodedB)
if !p.Matches(cp) {
formulas = append(formulas, bf.Or(A, bf.Or(bf.Not(A), bf.Not(B))))
formulas = append(formulas, bf.Or(bf.Not(A), bf.Or(bf.Not(A), bf.Not(B))))
}
}
}
@ -495,62 +495,60 @@ func (pack *DefaultPackage) BuildFormula(definitiondb PackageDatabase, db Packag
if err != nil || len(packages) == 0 {
required = requiredDef
} else {
if len(packages) == 1 {
required = packages[0]
} else {
var ALO, priorityConstraints, priorityALO []bf.Formula
// Try to prio best match
// Force the solver to consider first our candidate (if does exists).
// Then builds ALO and AMO for the requires.
c, candidateErr := definitiondb.FindPackageCandidate(requiredDef)
var C bf.Formula
if candidateErr == nil {
// We have a desired candidate, try to look a solution with that included first
for _, o := range packages {
encodedB, err := o.Encode(db)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
B := bf.Var(encodedB)
if !o.Matches(c) {
priorityConstraints = append(priorityConstraints, bf.Not(B))
priorityALO = append(priorityALO, B)
}
}
encodedC, err := c.Encode(db)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
C = bf.Var(encodedC)
// Or the Candidate is true, or all the others might be not true
// This forces the CDCL sat implementation to look first at a solution with C=true
formulas = append(formulas, bf.Or(bf.Or(C, bf.Or(priorityConstraints...)), bf.Or(bf.Not(C), bf.Or(priorityALO...))))
}
var ALO, priorityConstraints, priorityALO []bf.Formula
// AMO - At most one
// Try to prio best match
// Force the solver to consider first our candidate (if does exists).
// Then builds ALO and AMO for the requires.
c, candidateErr := definitiondb.FindPackageCandidate(requiredDef)
var C bf.Formula
if candidateErr == nil {
// We have a desired candidate, try to look a solution with that included first
for _, o := range packages {
encodedB, err := o.Encode(db)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
B := bf.Var(encodedB)
ALO = append(ALO, B)
for _, i := range packages {
encodedI, err := i.Encode(db)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
I := bf.Var(encodedI)
if !o.Matches(i) {
formulas = append(formulas, bf.Or(bf.Not(I), bf.Not(B)))
}
if !o.Matches(c) {
priorityConstraints = append(priorityConstraints, bf.Not(B))
priorityALO = append(priorityALO, B)
}
}
formulas = append(formulas, bf.Or(ALO...)) // ALO - At least one
continue
encodedC, err := c.Encode(db)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
C = bf.Var(encodedC)
// Or the Candidate is true, or all the others might be not true
// This forces the CDCL sat implementation to look first at a solution with C=true
formulas = append(formulas, bf.Or(bf.Not(A), bf.Or(bf.Or(C, bf.Or(priorityConstraints...)), bf.Or(bf.Not(C), bf.Or(priorityALO...)))))
}
// AMO - At most one
for _, o := range packages {
encodedB, err := o.Encode(db)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
B := bf.Var(encodedB)
ALO = append(ALO, B)
for _, i := range packages {
encodedI, err := i.Encode(db)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
I := bf.Var(encodedI)
if !o.Matches(i) {
formulas = append(formulas, bf.Or(bf.Not(A), bf.Or(bf.Not(I), bf.Not(B))))
}
}
}
formulas = append(formulas, bf.Or(bf.Not(A), bf.Or(ALO...))) // ALO - At least one
continue
}
}
encodedB, err := required.Encode(db)

View File

@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ import (
type PackageSolver interface {
SetDefinitionDatabase(pkg.PackageDatabase)
Install(p []pkg.Package) (PackagesAssertions, error)
Uninstall(candidate pkg.Package) ([]pkg.Package, error)
Uninstall(candidate pkg.Package, checkconflicts bool) ([]pkg.Package, error)
ConflictsWithInstalled(p pkg.Package) (bool, error)
ConflictsWith(p pkg.Package, ls []pkg.Package) (bool, error)
World() []pkg.Package
Upgrade() ([]pkg.Package, PackagesAssertions, error)
Upgrade(checkconflicts bool) ([]pkg.Package, PackagesAssertions, error)
SetResolver(PackageResolver)
@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ func (s *Solver) ConflictsWithInstalled(p pkg.Package) (bool, error) {
return s.ConflictsWith(p, s.Installed())
}
func (s *Solver) Upgrade() ([]pkg.Package, PackagesAssertions, error) {
func (s *Solver) Upgrade(checkconflicts bool) ([]pkg.Package, PackagesAssertions, error) {
// First get candidates that needs to be upgraded..
@ -236,12 +236,11 @@ func (s *Solver) Upgrade() ([]pkg.Package, PackagesAssertions, error) {
}
}
}
s2 := NewSolver(installedcopy, s.DefinitionDatabase, pkg.NewInMemoryDatabase(false))
s2.SetResolver(s.Resolver)
// Then try to uninstall the versions in the system, and store that tree
for _, p := range toUninstall {
r, err := s.Uninstall(p)
r, err := s.Uninstall(p, checkconflicts)
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, errors.Wrap(err, "Could not compute upgrade - couldn't uninstall selected candidate "+p.GetFingerPrint())
}
@ -262,7 +261,7 @@ func (s *Solver) Upgrade() ([]pkg.Package, PackagesAssertions, error) {
// Uninstall takes a candidate package and return a list of packages that would be removed
// in order to purge the candidate. Returns error if unsat.
func (s *Solver) Uninstall(c pkg.Package) ([]pkg.Package, error) {
func (s *Solver) Uninstall(c pkg.Package, checkconflicts bool) ([]pkg.Package, error) {
var res []pkg.Package
candidate, err := s.InstalledDatabase.FindPackage(c)
if err != nil {
@ -294,17 +293,19 @@ func (s *Solver) Uninstall(c pkg.Package) ([]pkg.Package, error) {
}
}
s2 := NewSolver(pkg.NewInMemoryDatabase(false), s.DefinitionDatabase, pkg.NewInMemoryDatabase(false))
s2.SetResolver(s.Resolver)
// Get the requirements to install the candidate
saved := s.InstalledDatabase
s.InstalledDatabase = pkg.NewInMemoryDatabase(false)
asserts, err := s.Install([]pkg.Package{candidate})
asserts, err := s2.Install([]pkg.Package{candidate})
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
s.InstalledDatabase = saved
for _, a := range asserts {
if a.Value {
if !checkconflicts {
res = append(res, a.Package.IsFlagged(false))
continue
}
c, err := s.ConflictsWithInstalled(a.Package)
if err != nil {

View File

@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Solver", func() {
Expect(solution).To(ContainElement(PackageAssert{Package: D1, Value: false}))
Expect(solution).ToNot(ContainElement(PackageAssert{Package: E, Value: true}))
Expect(len(solution)).To(Equal(5))
Expect(len(solution)).To(Equal(6))
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
})
@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Solver", func() {
Expect(solution).To(ContainElement(PackageAssert{Package: D1, Value: false}))
Expect(solution).ToNot(ContainElement(PackageAssert{Package: E, Value: true}))
Expect(len(solution)).To(Equal(4))
Expect(len(solution)).To(Equal(6))
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
})
@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Solver", func() {
Expect(solution).To(ContainElement(PackageAssert{Package: D1, Value: false}))
Expect(solution).ToNot(ContainElement(PackageAssert{Package: E, Value: true}))
Expect(len(solution)).To(Equal(4))
Expect(len(solution)).To(Equal(6))
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
})
@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Solver", func() {
}
s = NewSolver(dbInstalled, dbDefinitions, db)
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A)
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A, true)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
Expect(solution).To(ContainElement(A.IsFlagged(false)))
@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Solver", func() {
}
s = NewSolver(dbInstalled, dbDefinitions, db)
solution, err := s.Uninstall(&pkg.DefaultPackage{Name: "A", Version: ">1.0"})
solution, err := s.Uninstall(&pkg.DefaultPackage{Name: "A", Version: ">1.0"}, true)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
Expect(solution).To(ContainElement(A.IsFlagged(false)))
@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Solver", func() {
_, err := dbInstalled.CreatePackage(p)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
}
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A)
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A, true)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
Expect(solution).To(ContainElement(A.IsFlagged(false)))
@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Solver", func() {
_, err := dbInstalled.CreatePackage(p)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
}
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A)
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A, true)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
Expect(solution).To(ContainElement(A.IsFlagged(false)))
@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Solver", func() {
_, err := dbInstalled.CreatePackage(p)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
}
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A)
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A, true)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
Expect(solution).To(ContainElement(A.IsFlagged(false)))
@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Solver", func() {
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
}
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A)
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A, true)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
Expect(solution).To(ContainElement(A.IsFlagged(false)))
@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Solver", func() {
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
}
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A)
solution, err := s.Uninstall(A, true)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
Expect(solution).To(ContainElement(A.IsFlagged(false)))
@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ var _ = Describe("Solver", func() {
_, err := dbInstalled.CreatePackage(p)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
}
uninstall, solution, err := s.Upgrade()
uninstall, solution, err := s.Upgrade(true)
Expect(err).ToNot(HaveOccurred())
Expect(len(uninstall)).To(Equal(1))

View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
category: "test"
name: "c"
version: "1.0"
# Boom?
requires:
- category: "test"
name: "a"
version: ">=0.1"

View File

@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
image: "alpine"
prelude:
- echo foo > /test
- echo bar > /test2
steps:
- echo artifact3 > /testlatest
- echo artifact4 > /testlatest2
requires:
- category: "test"
name: "b"
version: "1.0"

View File

@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
category: "test"
name: "a"
version: "1.2"

View File

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ oneTimeTearDown() {
testBuild() {
mkdir $tmpdir/testbuild
luet build --all --tree "$ROOT_DIR/tests/fixtures/qlearning" --destination $tmpdir/testbuild --compression gzip
luet build --all --concurrency 1 --tree "$ROOT_DIR/tests/fixtures/qlearning" --destination $tmpdir/testbuild --compression gzip
buildst=$?
assertEquals 'builds successfully' "$buildst" "0"
assertTrue 'create package dep B' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testbuild/b-test-1.0.package.tar.gz' ]"

View File

@ -29,10 +29,22 @@ testBuild() {
luet build --tree "$ROOT_DIR/tests/fixtures/upgrade_integration" --destination $tmpdir/testbuild --compression gzip test/a-1.1
buildst=$?
assertEquals 'builds successfully' "$buildst" "0"
assertEquals 'builds successfully' "$buildst" "0"
assertTrue 'create package A 1.1' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testbuild/a-test-1.1.package.tar.gz' ]"
luet build --tree "$ROOT_DIR/tests/fixtures/upgrade_integration" --destination $tmpdir/testbuild --compression gzip test/a-1.2
buildst=$?
assertEquals 'builds successfully' "$buildst" "0"
assertTrue 'create package A 1.2' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testbuild/a-test-1.2.package.tar.gz' ]"
luet build --tree "$ROOT_DIR/tests/fixtures/upgrade_integration" --destination $tmpdir/testbuild --compression gzip test/c-1.0
buildst=$?
assertEquals 'builds successfully' "$buildst" "0"
assertTrue 'create package C 1.0' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testbuild/c-test-1.0.package.tar.gz' ]"
}
testRepo() {
@ -73,27 +85,36 @@ EOF
testInstall() {
luet install --config $tmpdir/luet.yaml test/b-1.0
#luet install --config $tmpdir/luet.yaml test/c-1.0 > /dev/null
installst=$?
assertEquals 'install test successfully' "$installst" "0"
assertTrue 'package installed B' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/test5' ]"
luet install --config $tmpdir/luet.yaml test/a-1.0
#luet install --config $tmpdir/luet.yaml test/c-1.0 > /dev/null
assertTrue 'package installed A' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/testaa' ]"
assertTrue 'package installed A' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/testaa' ]"
installst=$?
assertEquals 'install test successfully' "$installst" "0"
luet install --config $tmpdir/luet.yaml test/a-1.1
assertTrue 'package installed A' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/testaa' ]"
installst=$?
assertEquals 'install test successfully' "$installst" "0"
assertTrue 'package keeps old A' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/testaa' ]"
assertTrue 'package new A was not installed' "[ ! -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/testlatest' ]"
luet install --config $tmpdir/luet.yaml test/c-1.0
installst=$?
assertEquals 'install test successfully' "$installst" "0"
assertTrue 'package installed C' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/c' ]"
}
testUpgrade() {
output=$(luet --config $tmpdir/luet.yaml upgrade)
luet --config $tmpdir/luet.yaml upgrade
installst=$?
echo $output
assertEquals 'install test successfully' "$installst" "0"
assertTrue 'package uninstalled B' "[ ! -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/test5' ]"
assertTrue 'package installed B' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/newc' ]"
assertTrue 'package uninstalled A' "[ ! -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/testaa' ]"
assertTrue 'package installed new A' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/test3' ]"
assertTrue 'package installed new A' "[ -e '$tmpdir/testrootfs/testlatest' ]"
}
# Load shUnit2.