If the user passes "--proxy-mode ipvs", and it is not possible to use
IPVS, then error out rather than falling back to iptables.
There was never any good reason to be doing fallback; this was
presumably erroneously added to parallel the iptables-to-userspace
fallback (which only existed because we had wanted iptables to be the
default but not all systems could support it).
In particular, if the user passed configuration options for ipvs, then
they presumably *didn't* pass configuration options for iptables, and
so even if the iptables proxy is able to run, it is likely to be
misconfigured.
Back when iptables was first made the default, there were
theoretically some users who wouldn't have been able to support it due
to having an old /sbin/iptables. But kube-proxy no longer does the
things that didn't work with old iptables, and we removed that check a
long time ago. There is also a check for a new-enough kernel version,
but it's checking for a feature which was added in kernel 3.6, and no
one could possibly be running Kubernetes with a kernel that old. So
the fallback code now never actually falls back, so it should just be
removed.
This was implemented partly in server.go and partly in
server_others.go even though even the parts in server.go were totally
linux-specific. Simplify things by putting it all in server_others.go
and get rid of some unnecessary abstraction.
Fixes instances of #98213 (to ultimately complete #98213 linting is
required).
This commit fixes a few instances of a common mistake done when writing
parallel subtests or Ginkgo tests (basically any test in which the test
closure is dynamically created in a loop and the loop doesn't wait for
the test closure to complete).
I'm developing a very specific linter that detects this king of mistake
and these are the only violations of it it found in this repo (it's not
airtight so there may be more).
In the case of Ginkgo tests, without this fix, only the last entry in
the loop iteratee is actually tested. In the case of Parallel tests I
think it's the same problem but maybe a bit different, iiuc it depends
on the execution speed.
Waiting for the CI to confirm the tests are still passing, even after
this fix - since it's likely it's the first time those test cases are
executed - they may be buggy or testing code that is buggy.
Another instance of this is in `test/e2e/storage/csi_mock_volume.go` and
is still failing so it has been left out of this commit and will be
addressed in a separate one
The Priority is determined as follows:
P0: ClusterCIDR with higher number of matching labels has highest
priority.
P1: ClusterCIDR having cidrSet with fewer allocatable Pod CIDRs has
higher priority.
P2: ClusterCIDR with a PerNodeMaskSize having fewer IPs has higher
priority.
P3: ClusterCIDR having label with lower alphanumeric value has higher
priority.
P4: ClusterCIDR with a cidrSet having a smaller IP address value has
higher priority.
Add a new cidrset named `multicidrset` which extends the current
cidrset mechanism to track allocatable Pod and Service CIDRs.
multicidrset stores the info about allocated CIDRs in a Map as opposed
to the current cidrset implementation where it is stored in a bitmap.
Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api group.
Add `ClusterCIDR` type to networking/v1alpha1 api group, this type
will enable the NodeIPAM controller to support multiple ClusterCIDRs.
Updates predicate to check for a length >=2 to avoid
the index out of bounds panic.
Signed-off-by: Edwin Xie <exie@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Schultz <tschultz@vmware.com>
