**Description:** Fixes incorrect `num_skipped` count in the LangChain
indexing API. The current implementation only counts documents that
already exist in RecordManager (cross-batch duplicates) but fails to
count documents removed during within-batch deduplication via
`_deduplicate_in_order()`.
This PR adds tracking of the original batch size before deduplication
and includes the difference in `num_skipped`, ensuring that `num_added +
num_skipped` equals the total number of input documents.
**Issue:** Fixes incorrect document count reporting in indexing
statistics
**Dependencies:** None
Fixes#32272
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Feel <afilippov@spotware.com>
Add additional hashing options to the indexing API, warn on SHA-1
Requires:
- Bumping langchain-core version
- bumping min langchain-core in langchain
---------
Co-authored-by: ccurme <chester.curme@gmail.com>
**Description:** Before this commit, if one record is batched in more
than 32k rows for sqlite3 >= 3.32 or more than 999 rows for sqlite3 <
3.31, the `record_manager.delete_keys()` will fail, as we are creating a
query with too many variables.
This commit ensures that we are batching the delete operation leveraging
the `cleanup_batch_size` as it is already done for `full` cleanup.
Added unit tests for incremental mode as well on different deleting
batch size.
The delete methods in the VectorStore and DocumentIndex interfaces
return a status indicating the result. Therefore, we can assume that
their implementations don't throw exceptions but instead return a result
indicating whether the delete operations have failed. The current
implementation doesn't check the returned value, so I modified it to
throw an exception when the operation fails.
---------
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
~Note that this PR is now Draft, so I didn't add change to `aindex`
function and didn't add test codes for my change.
After we have an agreement on the direction, I will add commits.~
`batch_size` is very difficult to decide because setting a large number
like >10000 will impact VectorDB and RecordManager, while setting a
small number will delete records unnecessarily, leading to redundant
work, as the `IMPORTANT` section says.
On the other hand, we can't use `full` because the loader returns just a
subset of the dataset in our use case.
I guess many people are in the same situation as us.
So, as one of the possible solutions for it, I would like to introduce a
new argument, `scoped_full_cleanup`.
This argument will be valid only when `claneup` is Full. If True, Full
cleanup deletes all documents that haven't been updated AND that are
associated with source ids that were seen during indexing. Default is
False.
This change keeps backward compatibility.
---------
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eugene@langchain.dev>
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
I reported the bug 2 weeks ago here:
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/issues/28447
I believe this is a critical bug for the indexer, so I submitted a PR to
revert the change and added unit tests to prevent similar bugs from
being introduced in the future.
@eyurtsev Could you check this?
Added `**kwargs` parameters to the `index` and `aindex` functions in
`libs/core/langchain_core/indexing/api.py`. This allows users to pass
additional arguments to the `add_documents` and `aadd_documents`
methods, enabling the specification of a custom `vector_field`. For
example, users can now use `vector_field="embedding"` when indexing
documents in `OpenSearchVectorStore`
---------
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
- **Description:** prevent index function to re-index entire source
document even if nothing has changed.
- **Issue:** #22135
I worked on a solution to this issue that is a compromise between being
cheap and being fast.
In the previous code, when batch_size is greater than the number of docs
from a certain source almost the entire source is deleted (all documents
from that source except for the documents in the first batch)
My solution deletes documents from vector store and record manager only
if at least one document has changed for that source.
Hope this can help!
---------
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
Ruff doesn't know about the python version in
`[tool.poetry.dependencies]`. It can get it from
`project.requires-python`.
Notes:
* poetry seems to have issues getting the python constraints from
`requires-python` and using `python` in per dependency constraints. So I
had to duplicate the info. I will open an issue on poetry.
* `inspect.isclass()` doesn't work correctly with `GenericAlias`
(`list[...]`, `dict[..., ...]`) on Python <3.11 so I added some `not
isinstance(type, GenericAlias)` checks:
Python 3.11
```pycon
>>> import inspect
>>> inspect.isclass(list)
True
>>> inspect.isclass(list[str])
False
```
Python 3.9
```pycon
>>> import inspect
>>> inspect.isclass(list)
True
>>> inspect.isclass(list[str])
True
```
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
This PR adds a minimal document indexer abstraction.
The goal of this abstraction is to allow developers to create custom
retrievers that also have a standard indexing API and allow updating the
document content in them.
The abstraction comes with a test suite that can verify that the indexer
implements the correct semantics.
This is an iteration over a previous PRs
(https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/24364). The main
difference is that we're sub-classing from BaseRetriever in this
iteration and as so have consolidated the sync and async interfaces.
The main problem with the current design is that runt time search
configuration has to be specified at init rather than provided at run
time.
We will likely resolve this issue in one of the two ways:
(1) Define a method (`get_retriever`) that will allow creating a
retriever at run time with a specific configuration.. If we do this, we
will likely break the subclass on BaseRetriever
(2) Generalize base retriever so it can support structured queries
---------
Co-authored-by: Erick Friis <erick@langchain.dev>
Refactor the code to use the existing InMemroyVectorStore.
This change is needed for another PR that moves some of the imports
around (and messes up the mock.patch in this file)
This PR rolls out part of the new proposed interface for vectorstores
(https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/23544) to existing store
implementations.
The PR makes the following changes:
1. Adds standard upsert, streaming_upsert, aupsert, astreaming_upsert
methods to the vectorstore.
2. Updates `add_texts` and `aadd_texts` to be non required with a
default implementation that delegates to `upsert` and `aupsert` if those
have been implemented. The original `add_texts` and `aadd_texts` methods
are problematic as they spread object specific information across
document and **kwargs. (e.g., ids are not a part of the document)
3. Adds a default implementation to `add_documents` and `aadd_documents`
that delegates to `upsert` and `aupsert` respectively.
4. Adds standard unit tests to verify that a given vectorstore
implements a correct read/write API.
A downside of this implementation is that it creates `upsert` with a
very similar signature to `add_documents`.
The reason for introducing `upsert` is to:
* Remove any ambiguities about what information is allowed in `kwargs`.
Specifically kwargs should only be used for information common to all
indexed data. (e.g., indexing timeout).
*Allow inheriting from an anticipated generalized interface for indexing
that will allow indexing `BaseMedia` (i.e., allow making a vectorstore
for images/audio etc.)
`add_documents` can be deprecated in the future in favor of `upsert` to
make sure that users have a single correct way of indexing content.
---------
Co-authored-by: ccurme <chester.curme@gmail.com>
This PR moves the interface and the logic to core.
The following changes to namespaces:
`indexes` -> `indexing`
`indexes._api` -> `indexing.api`
Testing code is intentionally duplicated for now since it's testing
different
implementations of the record manager (in-memory vs. SQL).
Common logic will need to be pulled out into the test client.
A follow up PR will move the SQL based implementation outside of
LangChain.
