Tool-calling tests started intermittently failing with
> groq.APIError: Failed to call a function. Please adjust your prompt.
See 'failed_generation' for more details.
**Description:** The error message was supposed to display the missing
vector name, but instead, it includes only the existing collection
configs.
This simple PR just includes the correct variable name, so that the user
knows the requested vector does not exist in the collection.
Additional guidelines:
- Make sure optional dependencies are imported within a function.
- Please do not add dependencies to pyproject.toml files (even optional
ones) unless they are required for unit tests.
- Most PRs should not touch more than one package.
- Changes should be backwards compatible.
- If you are adding something to community, do not re-import it in
langchain.
If no one reviews your PR within a few days, please @-mention one of
baskaryan, eyurtsev, ccurme, vbarda, hwchase17.
Signed-off-by: Tin Lai <tin@tinyiu.com>
Perplexity's importance in the space has been growing, so we think it's
time to add an official integration!
Note: following the release of `langchain-perplexity` to `pypi`, we
should be able to add `perplexity` as an extra in
`libs/langchain/pyproject.toml`, but we're blocked by a circular import
for now.
---------
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Chester Curme <chester.curme@gmail.com>
Related to https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/issues/30344https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/30542 introduced an
erroneous test for token counts for o-series models. tiktoken==0.8 does
not support o-series models in
`tiktoken.encoding_for_model(model_name)`, and this is the version of
tiktoken we had in the lock file. So we would default to `cl100k_base`
for o-series, which is the wrong encoding model. The test tested against
this wrong encoding (so it passed with tiktoken 0.8).
Here we update tiktoken to 0.9 in the lock file, and fix the expected
counts in the test. Verified that we are pulling
[o200k_base](https://github.com/openai/tiktoken/blob/main/tiktoken/model.py#L8),
as expected.
**partners: Enable max_retries in ChatMistralAI**
**Description**
- This pull request reactivates the retry logic in the
completion_with_retry method of the ChatMistralAI class, restoring the
intended functionality of the previously ineffective max_retries
parameter. New unit test that mocks failed/successful retry calls and an
integration test to confirm end-to-end functionality.
**Issue**
- Closes#30362
**Dependencies**
- No additional dependencies required
Co-authored-by: andrasfe <andrasf94@gmail.com>
When OpenAI originally released `stream_options` to enable token usage
during streaming, it was not supported in AzureOpenAI. It is now
supported.
Like the [OpenAI
SDK](f66d2e6fdc/src/openai/resources/completions.py (L68)),
ChatOpenAI does not return usage metadata during streaming by default
(which adds an extra chunk to the stream). The OpenAI SDK requires users
to pass `stream_options={"include_usage": True}`. ChatOpenAI implements
a convenience argument `stream_usage: Optional[bool]`, and an attribute
`stream_usage: bool = False`.
Here we extend this to AzureChatOpenAI by moving the `stream_usage`
attribute and `stream_usage` kwarg (on `_(a)stream`) from ChatOpenAI to
BaseChatOpenAI.
---
Additional consideration: we must be sensitive to the number of users
using BaseChatOpenAI to interact with other APIs that do not support the
`stream_options` parameter.
Suppose OpenAI in the future updates the default behavior to stream
token usage. Currently, BaseChatOpenAI only passes `stream_options` if
`stream_usage` is True, so there would be no way to disable this new
default behavior.
To address this, we could update the `stream_usage` attribute to
`Optional[bool] = None`, but this is technically a breaking change (as
currently values of False are not passed to the client). IMO: if / when
this change happens, we could accompany it with this update in a minor
bump.
---
Related previous PRs:
- https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/22628
- https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/22854
- https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/23552
---------
Co-authored-by: Eugene Yurtsev <eyurtsev@gmail.com>
We are implementing a token-counting callback handler in
`langchain-core` that is intended to work with all chat models
supporting usage metadata. The callback will aggregate usage metadata by
model. This requires responses to include the model name in its
metadata.
To support this, if a model `returns_usage_metadata`, we check that it
includes a string model name in its `response_metadata` in the
`"model_name"` key.
More context: https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/30487
Deepseek model does not return reasoning when hosted on openrouter
(Issue [30067](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/issues/30067))
the following code did not return reasoning:
```python
llm = ChatDeepSeek( model = 'deepseek/deepseek-r1:nitro', api_base="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1", api_key=os.getenv("OPENROUTER_API_KEY"))
messages = [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are an assistant."},
{"role": "user", "content": "9.11 and 9.8, which is greater? Explain the reasoning behind this decision."}
]
response = llm.invoke(messages, extra_body={"include_reasoning": True})
print(response.content)
print(f"REASONING: {response.additional_kwargs.get('reasoning_content', '')}")
print(response)
```
The fix is to extract reasoning from
response.choices[0].message["model_extra"] and from
choices[0].delta["reasoning"]. and place in response additional_kwargs.
Change is really just the addition of a couple one-sentence if
statements.
---------
Co-authored-by: andrasfe <andrasf94@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Chester Curme <chester.curme@gmail.com>
# Description
This PR adds reasoning model support for `langchain-ollama` by
extracting reasoning token blocks, like those used in deepseek. It was
inspired by
[ollama-deep-researcher](https://github.com/langchain-ai/ollama-deep-researcher),
specifically the parsing of [thinking
blocks](6d1aaf2139/src/assistant/graph.py (L91)):
```python
# TODO: This is a hack to remove the <think> tags w/ Deepseek models
# It appears very challenging to prompt them out of the responses
while "<think>" in running_summary and "</think>" in running_summary:
start = running_summary.find("<think>")
end = running_summary.find("</think>") + len("</think>")
running_summary = running_summary[:start] + running_summary[end:]
```
This notes that it is very hard to remove the reasoning block from
prompting, but we actually want the model to reason in order to increase
model performance. This implementation extracts the thinking block, so
the client can still expect a proper message to be returned by
`ChatOllama` (and use the reasoning content separately when desired).
This implementation takes the same approach as
[ChatDeepseek](5d581ba22c/libs/partners/deepseek/langchain_deepseek/chat_models.py (L215)),
which adds the reasoning content to
chunk.additional_kwargs.reasoning_content;
```python
if hasattr(response.choices[0].message, "reasoning_content"): # type: ignore
rtn.generations[0].message.additional_kwargs["reasoning_content"] = (
response.choices[0].message.reasoning_content # type: ignore
)
```
This should probably be handled upstream in ollama + ollama-python, but
this seems like a reasonably effective solution. This is a standalone
example of what is happening;
```python
async def deepseek_message_astream(
llm: BaseChatModel,
messages: list[BaseMessage],
config: RunnableConfig | None = None,
*,
model_target: str = "deepseek-r1",
**kwargs: Any,
) -> AsyncIterator[BaseMessageChunk]:
"""Stream responses from Deepseek models, filtering out <think> tags.
Args:
llm: The language model to stream from
messages: The messages to send to the model
Yields:
Filtered chunks from the model response
"""
# check if the model is deepseek based
if (llm.name and model_target not in llm.name) or (hasattr(llm, "model") and model_target not in llm.model):
async for chunk in llm.astream(messages, config=config, **kwargs):
yield chunk
return
# Yield with a buffer, upon completing the <think></think> tags, move them to the reasoning content and start over
buffer = ""
async for chunk in llm.astream(messages, config=config, **kwargs):
# start or append
if not buffer:
buffer = chunk.content
else:
buffer += chunk.content if hasattr(chunk, "content") else chunk
# Process buffer to remove <think> tags
if "<think>" in buffer or "</think>" in buffer:
if hasattr(chunk, "tool_calls") and chunk.tool_calls:
raise NotImplementedError("tool calls during reasoning should be removed?")
if "<think>" in chunk.content or "</think>" in chunk.content:
continue
chunk.additional_kwargs["reasoning_content"] = chunk.content
chunk.content = ""
# upon block completion, reset the buffer
if "<think>" in buffer and "</think>" in buffer:
buffer = ""
yield chunk
```
# Issue
Integrating reasoning models (e.g. deepseek-r1) into existing LangChain
based workflows is hard due to the thinking blocks that are included in
the message contents. To avoid this, we could match the `ChatOllama`
integration with `ChatDeepseek` to return the reasoning content inside
`message.additional_arguments.reasoning_content` instead.
# Dependenices
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Chester Curme <chester.curme@gmail.com>
- Test if models support forcing tool calls via `tool_choice`. If they
do, they should support
- `"any"` to specify any tool
- the tool name as a string to force calling a particular tool
- Add `tool_choice` to signature of `BaseChatModel.bind_tools` in core
- Deprecate `tool_choice_value` in standard tests in favor of a boolean
`has_tool_choice`
Will follow up with PRs in external repos (tested in AWS and Google
already).
**Description:**
This PR fixes a minor typo in the comments within
`libs/partners/openai/langchain_openai/chat_models/base.py`. The word
"ben" has been corrected to "be" for clarity and professionalism.
**Issue:**
N/A
**Dependencies:**
None
The default model for `ChatGroq`, `"mixtral-8x7b-32768"`, is being
retired on March 20, 2025. Here we remove the default, such that model
names must be explicitly specified (being explicit is a good practice
here, and avoids the need for breaking changes down the line). This
change will be released in a minor version bump to 0.3.
This follows https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/30161
(released in version 0.2.5), where we began generating warnings to this
effect.
