When waiting for the default service account in a new namespace, not finding
one was reported as "unexpected error: timed out waiting for the condition"...
Hi team, hope u all doing well.
I have checked TODO that to remove "retry" if feasible but it's important i think that it shouldn't be removed because it was used in every file on your repo.
Update idempotency.go
Update idempotency.go
Update idempotency.go
When Ginkgo shows a BeforeEach/AfterEach/DeferCleanup, then it can only show
the source code where the callback was registered because there is no
description parameter. This can be improved by passing a custom CodeLocation.
Because a description like "set up framework" might not be enough, the source
code is still shown, too.
SharedInformerFactory starts goroutines in Start and those can be stopped by
closing the stop channel. However, there was no API that waits for the
goroutines.
This is a problem for unit testing. A test has to return while the informers
are still running, which may get flagged by tools like
https://github.com/uber-go/goleak or by klog/ktesting when those informers
lead to log output.
While at it, more documentation gets added to address
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/65036.
This `DeploymentSpec` struct is used internally; the ones used for
serialization do have a pointer and this text was most likely copied
from there and not corrected.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
This is useful for running a driver on a subset of all ready nodes:
- use e2enode.GetBoundedReadySchedulableNodes with a suitable
maximum number of nodes to determine how much nodes are available
for a test
- define pod anti-affinity in the PodTemplate:
affinity:
podAntiAffinity:
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
- labelSelector:
matchLabels:
app.kubernetes.io/instance: xxxxxxx
topologyKey: kubernetes.io/hostname
- set the ReplicaSetSpec.Replicas value to the number of nodes
If the control plane emits anything at the time when the test runs, for example
"unable to sync kubernetes service", the test breaks because that additional
output is unexpected.
Pulling the CreateKubeConfig function from the expensive to build
test/utils/apiserver package had a considerable impact on the overall build
time because that package depends on a lot of other packages.
Because only that one function is needed by the framework, that extra build
time can be avoided by moving it into its own package.
The framework.AddCleanupAction API was a workaround for Ginkgo v1 not invoking
AfterEach callbacks after a test failure. Ginkgo v2 not only fixed that, but
also added a DeferCleanup API which can be used to run some code if (and only
if!) the corresponding setup code ran. In several cases that makes the test
cleanup simpler.
This covers multiple facets of the current framework and of Ginkgo:
- Ginkgo output is verbose and includes detailed progress
messages (BeforeEach/AfterEach tracing).
- Namespace creation.
- Order of callback invocation.
This runs etcd and an apiserver using it inside the test process. The caller
can either use the ClientSet or the config file. More options might get added
in the future.
Co-author: Antonio Ojea <antonio.ojea.garcia@gmail.com>
