Do vMSI-X remap only when Mask Bit in Vector Control Register for MSI-X Table Entry
is unmask.
The previous implementation also has two issues:
1. It only check whether Message Control Register for MSI-X has been modified when
guest writes MSI-X CFG space at Message Control Register offset.
2. It doesn't really disable MSI-X when guest wants to disable MSI-X.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
1. disable physical MSI before writing the virtual MSI CFG space
2. do the remap_vmsi if the guest wants to enable MSI or update MSI address or data
3. disable INTx and enable MSI after step 2.
The previous Message Control check depends on the guest write MSI Message Control
Register at the offset of Message Control Register. However, the guest could access
this register at the offset of MSI Capability ID register. This patch remove this
constraint. Also, The previous implementation didn't really disable MSI when guest
wanted to disable MSI.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Name vmsi and vmsix function with verb-object style:
For external APIs, using MODULE_NAME_verb-object style;
For internal APIs, using verb-object style.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
ptirq_msix_remap doesn't do the real remap, that's the vmsi_remap and vmsix_remap_entry
does. ptirq_msix_remap only did the preparation.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
After reshuffle pci_bar structrue we could write ~0U not BAR size mask to BAR
configuration space directly when do BAR sizing. In this case, we could know whether
the value in BAR configuration space is a valid base address. As a result, we could
do BAR re-programming whenever we want.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
The current code declare pci_bar structure following the PCI bar spec. However,
we could not tell whether the value in virtual BAR configuration space is valid
base address base on current pci_bar structure. We need to add more fields which
are duplicated instances of the vBAR information. Basides these fields which will
added, bar_base_mapped is another duplicated instance of the vBAR information.
This patch try to reshuffle the pci_bar structure to declare pci_bar structure
following the software implement benefit not the PCI bar spec.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
The current do PCI IO BAR remap in vdev_pt_allow_io_vbar. This patch split this
function into vdev_pt_deny_io_vbar and vdev_pt_allow_io_vbar. vdev_pt_deny_io_vbar
removes the old IO port mapping, vdev_pt_allow_io_vbar add the new IO port mapping.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Concurrent access on PCI device may happened if UOS try to access PCI configuration
space on different vCPUs through IO port. This patch just adds a global PCI lock for
each VM to prevent the concurrent access.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Refine PCI CONFIG_ADDRESS Register definition as its physical layout.
In this case, we could read/write PCI CONFIG_ADDRESS Register atomically.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Unmap old mappings in vdev_pt_write_vbar explicitly before set_vbar_base.
Then map new mappings explicitly in vdev_pt_write_vbar.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
In theory, guest could re-program PCI BAR address to any address. However, ACRN
hypervisor only support [0, top_address_space) EPT memory mapping. So we need to
check whether the PCI BAR re-program address is within this scope.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
'info.pmsi_addr' may be written to physicall device's
PCI configuration field without initialization when
'enable' is false in 'vmsi_remap()'.
this patch is to fix above issues, 'PCIR_MSI_ADDR'
and 'PCIR_MSI_ADDR_HIGH' only be programmed when
'enable' is true.
Tracked-On: #3903
Signed-off-by: Yonghua Huang <yonghua.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Junjie Mao <junjie.mao@intel.com>
--remove unnecessary includes
--remove unnecssary forward-declaration for 'struct vhm_request'
Tracked-On: #861
Signed-off-by: Mingqiang Chi <mingqiang.chi@intel.com>
The MSI Message Address and Message Data have no valid data after Power-ON. So
there's no need to initialize them by reading the data from physical PCI configuration
space.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
- update the function argument type to union
Declaring argument as pointer is not necessary since it
only does the comparison.
Tracked-On: #1842
Signed-off-by: Shiqing Gao <shiqing.gao@intel.com>
Initialize vBAR configure space when doing vPCI BAR initialization. At this time,
we access the physical device as we needs, no need to cache physical PCI device
BAR information beforehand.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
In "commit 6ebc22" the vPCI device initialize sequence is wrong changed. This patch
tries to revert it.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
In "commit 90480d" we use a pointer new_owner to point to the actual vPCI device
for post-launched VM when this device is assigned to this post-launched VM from
SOS. However, now DM will use SOS's vmsix_table_mmio_access_handler to trap vMSI-X
table mmio access for post-launched VM. So we should use the post-launched VM's
vPCI device in this case.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
vPCI device should use its virtual configure space to access its BAR after vPCI
device initialized.
This patch also remove corner case "vPCI device will use its 64 bits BAR high idx
to access its BAR base address".
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
PCI BAR physical base address will never changed. Cache it to avoid calculating
it every time when we access it.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@Intel.com>
Currently, 'flags' is defined and set but never be used
in the flow of handling i/o request after then.
Tracked-On: #861
Signed-off-by: Yonghua Huang <yonghua.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
In the definition of port i/o handler, struct acrn_vm * pointer
is redundant as input, as context of acrn_vm is aleady linked
in struct acrn_vcpu * by vcpu->vm, 'vm' is not required as input.
this patch removes argument '*vm' from 'io_read_fn_t' &
'io_write_fn_t', use '*vcpu' for them instead.
Tracked-On: #861
Signed-off-by: Yonghua Huang <yonghua.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Chen CJ <jason.cj.chen@intel.com>
When assgined a PCI PTDev to post-launched VM from SOS, using a pointer to point to
the real struct pci_vdev. When post-launched VM access its PTDev configure space in
SOS address space, using this real struct pci_vdev.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Add a field (vdev_ops) in struct acrn_vm_pci_dev_config to configure a PCI CFG
operation for an emulated PCI device. Use pci_pt_dev_ops for PCI_DEV_TYPE_PTDEV
by default if there's no such configure.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Create an iommu domain for all guest in vpci_init no matter if there's a PTDev
in it.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Zhang <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Now almost the vPCI device information could be obtain from PCI device configure
in VM configure. init_vdevs could make things more easier.
And rename init_vdevs to vpci_init_vdevs, init_vdev to vpci_init_vdevs to avoid
MISRA-C violations.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Zhang <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
pci_dev_config in VM configure stores all the PCI devices for a VM. Besides PT
devices, there're other type devices, like virtual host bridge. So rename ptdev
to pci_dev for these configure.
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
The functions always return 0 so it makes sense to make them void functions
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
The caller function has already done the checking to make sure the req is targeted
for the called functions, so there is no need to do the same checking in called
functions.
Remove calling of is_bar_offset() in vdev_pt_read_cfg/vdev_pt_write_cfg:
In vpci.c's vpci_read_pt_dev_cfg and vpci_write_dev_cfg, vbar_access is called
first to make sure the req is targed for vdev pt (vbar emulation) before
dispatching the request to vdev_pt_read_cfg/vdev_pt_write_cfg, so there is no
need to call is_bar_offset() again to do the same checking in vdev_pt_read_cfg/vdev_pt_write_cfg.
The same goes for msicap_access/msixcap_access
vbar_access should only check if the req is for bar access, it should not care
about whether the bar access is 4 bytes or 4 bytes aligned. The called function
vdev_pt_write_vbar will check and ignore the write access if it is not 4 bytes or 4 bytes
aligned, although this is counted as a bar access.
vdev_pt_read_vbar will check if the read access is 4 bytes or 4 bytes
aligned, although this is counted as a bar access, set read value (*val) to
-1 if the access is not 4 bytes (or aligned).
Tracked-On: #3475
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
This is a followup patch to fix the coding style issue introduced
in by commit "c2d25aafb889ade954af8795df2405a94024d860":
The unmodified pointer should be defined as const
Also addressed one comments from Fei to use reversed function call
in vpci_init_pt_dev and vpci_deinit_pt_dev.
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
And use vhostbridge for both SOS and pre-launched VM.
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
And use the ops based operations instead of direct access vdev
specific API.
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Rename vbdf to bdf for the following reasons:
Use the same coding style as struct pci_pdev, as pci_pdev uses bdf instead of pbdf
pci_vdev implies the its bdf is virtual, no need to prefix bdf with the v
prefix (redundant)
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
For PIO bar emulation, initially or when guest reprograms the PIO bar, allow guest
access for the specified bar base address (pio port) and sized by calling vev_pt_allow_io_vbar
For PIO bar emulation, just set the initial vbar base address equal to pbar
base address. For example, if the pbar base address is 0x2000, then set the
initial vbar base address also to 0x2000
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
For sos, its vbar base address is set to pbar base address (vbar gpa = pbar
hpa)
For pre-launched VMs, vbar base address is pre-assigned in vm_config
Rename vdev_pt_remap_msix_table_bar to vdev_pt_remap_msix_table_vbar and make it
a static function
Remove unused function prototye vdev_pt_remap_msix_table_bar() in vpci_priv.h
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Enable 64-bit bar emulation, if pbar is of type PCIBAR_MEM64, vbar will also be
of type PCIBAR_MEM64 instead of PCIBAR_MEM32
With 64-bit bar emulation code in place, we can remove enum pci_bar_type type
from struct pci_bar as bar type can be derived from struct pci_bar's reg member
by using the pci_get_bar_type function
Rename functions:
pci_base_from_size_mask --> git_size_masked_bar_base
Remove unused functions
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Create 2 functions from code:
pci_base_from_size_mask
vdev_pt_remap_mem_vbar
Use vbar in place of vdev->bar[idx] by setting vbar to &vdev->bar[idx]
Change base to uint64_t to accommodate 64-bit MMIO bar size masking in
subsequent commits
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
At this point, uint64_t base in struct pci_bar is not used by any code, so we
can remove it.
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Only do the EPT mapping if vbar base (gpa) is not mapped to the same pbar (hpa) before.
Need to unmap the existing mapping for a vbar base (gpa), otherwise, hv will
throw an error.
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Define/Use variable in place of code to improve readability:
Define new local variable struct pci_bar *vbar, and use vbar-> in place of vdev->bar[idx].
Define new local variable uint64_t vbar_base in init_vdev_pt
Rename uint64_t vbar[PCI_BAR_COUNT] of struct acrn_vm_pci_ptdev_config to uint64_t vbar_base[PCI_BAR_COUNT]
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Replace new_base with vbar_base in vdev_pt_remap_generic_mem_vbar().
We will call vdev_pt_remap_generic_mem_vbar() after a new vbar base
is set, no need to pass new_base to vdev_pt_remap_generic_mem_vbar(),
as this new vbar base (vbar_base) can be obtained by calling get_vbar_base().
The reason we call vdev_pt_remap_generic_mem_vbar() after a new vbar base
is set is for 64-bit mmio handling: when the lower 32-bit of 64-bit mmio vbar is
set, we will defer calling vdev_pt_remap_generic_mem_vbar until its upper 32-bit
vbar base is set.
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
To remember the previously mapped/registered vbar base
For the following reasons:
register_mmio_emulation_handler() will throw an error if the the same addr_lo is
alreayd registered before
We are going to remove the base member from struct pci_bar, so we cannot use vdev->bar[idx].base
in the code any more
In subsequent commits, we will assume vdev_pt_remap_generic_mem_vbar() is called after a new
vbar base is set, mainly because of 64-bit mmio bar handling, so we need a
separate bar_base_mapped[] array to track the previously mapped vbar bases.
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
vbar base can be built by using the base address fields stored in
struct pci_bar's reg member.
get_vbar_base: return vbar's base address in 64-bit. For 64-bit MMIO bar, its lower 32-bits
base address and upper 32-bits base are combined into one 64-bit base address
And changed related code to use get_vbar_base to get vbar base address in
64-bit.
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
We added "union pci_bar_reg reg" to struct pci_bar in previous commit,
but only pci_pdev uses it and pci_vdev does not use it. Starting from
this commit, pci_vdev will use it:
In init_vdev_pt(), copy pbar's reg's flags portion to corresponding vbar's
reg.
When guest updates the vbar base address, the corresponding vbar reg's base
address will also be updated, so that in subsequent commits, we can eventually
remove the base member in struct pci_bar.
Rename local variable new_bar to base in vdev_pt_write_vbar
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
pbar base can be built by using the base address fields stored in
struct pci_bar's reg member.
get_pbar_base: return pbar's base address in 64-bit. For 64-bit MMIO bar, its lower 32-bits
base address and upper 32-bits base are combined into one 64-bit base address
pci_bar_2_bar_base: helper function that is called by get_pbar_base
And changed related code to use get_pbar_base to get pbar base address in 64-bit
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
There is no need to call get_bar_base(), as new_bar is set to val & mask,
where mask is the bar size mask, so new_base has already been set to be the
bar base address before get_bar_base() is called on it.
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Use nr_bars instead of PCI_BAR_COUNT to check bar access offset.
As while normal pci device has max 6 bars, pci bridge only has 2 bars,
so for pci normal pci device, pci cfg offsets 0x10-0x24 are for bar access,
but for pci bridge, only 0x10-0x14 are for bar access (0x18-0x24 are
for other accesses).
Rename function:
pci_bar_access --> is_bar_offset
Tracked-On: #3241
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
